I'm late too, but here you have my opinion
At 02:03 05/02/2007, you wrote:
FWIW I don't interpret any posts on this thread as an attempt to change
SQLite, either. But there seems to be some who see value in more clearly
defining *when* SQLite *does* work. I guess that there is a lot of
enthusias
At 17:00 24/12/2006, you wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 09:35:01AM -0600, John Stanton wrote:
> >There is even a starting grammar for you:
> > http://www.antlr.org/grammar/1107752678378/PLSQLGrammar.g
> A compiler for a subset of PL/SQL would not be too arduous a project,
If what you want is
At 03:41 22/12/2006, you wrote:
There has been discussion about extending Sqlite to have more
functions, but the risk is creating Sqlite-Bloat and losing the most
endearing feature of the product, its light weight and simplicity.
Here is an interesting and thought provoking discussion on the
At 22:03 13/12/2006, you wrote:
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time
and CPU understanding SQL...
Check HFS(16/32 bits) and HFS+(64 bits) filesystems from Apple, they
use B+ trees. The code is open source and you can find it on Darwin repository.
---
Hello Eduardo,
thank you for the hints given. Please can you tell me how to disable
journaling? In our project it is not important to have the database
persistent. We create the database, work with it, and destroy it within one
batch run. So we dont have to save it to disk ;-).
thank you so f
At 09:34 01/12/2006, you wrote:
Hi there,
we are on an challanging project with very high requirements on performance.
When doing some debugging we discover, that the sqlite method for creating
an memory-based database is much slower than using e.g /dev/shm on linux or
/tempfs on solaris. (We ha
201 - 206 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
