I do not see how such a major change can be justified in a minor point
release. For instance, currently amaroK does not work when using a
sqlite database on Debian Sid since they package it with sqlite 3.2.5.
Shouldn't this have waited for 4.0?
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:38:05 -0700 D. Richard Hipp w
On 9/5/05, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 10:57 -0500, Ian Monroe wrote:
> > I do not see how such a major change can be justified in a minor point
> > release. For instance, currently amaroK does not work when using a
> > sqlite d
On 9/5/05, Kiel W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Monroe wrote:
>
> >I do not see how such a major change can be justified in a minor point
> >release. For instance, currently amaroK does not work when using a
> >sqlite database on Debian Sid since the
On 9/5/05, Tobias Rundström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kiel W. wrote:
> > Ian Monroe wrote:
> >
> >> I do not see how such a major change can be justified in a minor point
> >> release. For instance, currently amaroK does not work when using a
> &
4 matches
Mail list logo