Julien LEFORT wrote:
Hi,
I've been struggling for few hours trying to run the configure script the
right way so I can cross compile sqlite3 for a powerpc target.
I guess it is only a problem of options I pass into the configure script.
here is the command I pass:
CC=powerpc-linux-gcc
OK, little puzzled by this one, wondering if my expectations of behavior
are off. (Apologies for the longish post..)
This is with 3.2.7. I have a reasonably simple 'users' table, with a
single compound index (at first) on user last/first name:
create table users (
id integer primary key,
Brad wrote:
I am looking for a simple way of using date and time values with
sqlite3. I have some Ctime classes (VC++.net) which have to be stored in
the database and they should be compared.
If the class you're using has .Value property, or a way to easily
transform the date from one
Ben Clewett wrote:
Dear SQLite
I wish to compile SQLite for the ARM processor running Linux (ARM720T).
The compilation will have to use the cross-compiler arm-linux-gcc
version 2.95.2 running on Intel Linux, since the devise it's self has
no compiler.
Does any person have an image for
Julien LEFORT wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement a log table with a finite dimension, for exemple a
table with 500 records, and when the last record is set in the table I would
like to come back at the first tuplet and write over the previous value
recorded. I think it's the way SQLite
tities, thus I didn't really expect SQLite to
have it.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bohme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 02:52 p.m.
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] ring buffer table
Julien LEFORT wrote:
Hi,
I would like to imp
Julien LEFORT wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement a log table with a finite dimension, for exemple a
table with 500 records, and when the last record is set in the table I would
like to come back at the first tuplet and write over the previous value
recorded. I think it's the way SQLite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone experimented with putting SQLite directly on the
Linux MTD flash interface? I.e. by-passing JFSS2. Would this
offer any kind of significant efficiency benefit?
JFFS2 is designed to wear the flash evenly, preventing you from
'drilling holes' by
Daniel Franke wrote:
> Layering. Wrap sqlite3_* into your own set of functions. Create another
> library, say libyourapp. Most functions will just forward the arguments to
> sqlite, but others, e.g. yourapp_open_db() will not only open the database,
> but also attach a couple of functions,
I have a small patch that adds "BEGIN SHARED" syntax in addition to
IMMEDIATE and EXCLUSIVE. I have an application that requires a
consistent view of the data across a number of individual statements.
What is ideal is a way to simply lock the database with a SHARED lock
for the duration, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul Bohme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have a small patch that adds "BEGIN SHARED" syntax in addition to
>> IMMEDIATE and EXCLUSIVE. I have an application that requires a
>> consistent view of the data
11 matches
Mail list logo