>
> This is also fast: SELECT * FROM data WHERE tstr BETWEEN tbegstr AND
> tendstr; And it works just as well if dates are in the ISO8601 format.
Aha, yes, thanks, this is certainly a better SELECT than converting string
data to numeric Julian Days. And the string can have as much resolution as
On 1/17/15, Stephan Buchert wrote:
> If selecting rows according to a date/timestamp is ever needed, numeric
> time stamps are clearly advantageous, e.g.
>
> SELECT * FROM data WHERE t BETWEEN julianday(tbegstr) AND
> julianday(tendstr);
>
> is much more efficient than
>
>
If selecting rows according to a date/timestamp is ever needed, numeric
time stamps are clearly advantageous, e.g.
SELECT * FROM data WHERE t BETWEEN julianday(tbegstr) AND
julianday(tendstr);
is much more efficient than
SELECT * FROM data WHERE julianday(tstr) BETWEEN julianday(tbegstr) AND
On 14 Jan 2015 at 23:13, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:40pm, Baruch Burstein wrote:
>
>> Of course, this is just at the theoretical level. As yo said, your app
>> probably wouldn't need to worry about this.
>
> I think a previous poster
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 7:09 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Best Practice: Storing Dates
>
> I'm a new sqlite user and new to this mailing list. I hope this question
> is appropriate.
>
> I am writing an application that needs to track a ti
On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:40pm, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> Of course, this is just at the theoretical level. As yo said, your app
> probably wouldn't need to worry about this.
I think a previous poster had it right. If you need to do lots of maths with
the timestamps store
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Chris Keilitz wrote:
> Since sqlite and most RDMS implementations have functions to convert to and
> from both options and using a LONG should allow the date/time to function
> way past 2038, it seems it comes down to how many bytes it takes to
For the data collection systems we use we store only UTC in the database.
The application can translate times to the appropriate time zone and format
for the user as required. This variable complexity needs to be controlled
into one layer of your program. Since governments, even some city ones,
on the day that day light
savings kicks in
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Keilitz
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 7:09 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Best Practice: Storing Dates
I'm a new
On 14 Jan 2015, at 5:53pm, Nigel Verity wrote:
> I generally just use a fixed-length 14-character string to store the date and
> time in MMDDHHMMSS format. It accommodates any time stamp across a 10,000
> year timespan and also supports simple date/time
Hi
Interesting discussion on the best way to store date/time fields.
Unix time certainly has advantages for portability but, I agree, it can be a
pain to convert, depending on which applications and tools you are interfacing
with.
ISO8601 is fine if you just need a local time stamp, but even
On 1/14/15, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Chris Keilitz wrote:
>
>> Since sqlite and most RDMS implementations have functions to convert to
>> and
>> from both options and using a LONG should allow the date/time to function
>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Chris Keilitz wrote:
> Since sqlite and most RDMS implementations have functions to convert to and
> from both options and using a LONG should allow the date/time to function
> way past 2038,
In my experience, having the timestamp in Unix
I'm a new sqlite user and new to this mailing list. I hope this question is
appropriate.
I am writing an application that needs to track a timestamp - date + time
down to the seconds. I'd like to store the date/time in a standard,
efficient, usable, portable format. I have looked over the sqlite
14 matches
Mail list logo