Which problem did you experience on SPARC?
It is a nearly impossible process. Can not be done unless you have a
very specific class of hardware.
Really? SQLite3 builds quite happily on the various SPARC S8 ...
Can we stop talking about historical hardware? I have Apache httpd
running
On 20/01/2019 15:03, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 1/19/19 10:55 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Dennis,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dennis Clarke
wrote:
And SPARC version is still available for download...
Let us know when you get that running.
Install of x86 went very smooth.
The x86_64
On 1/20/19 12:50 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 20/01/2019 15:03, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 1/19/19 10:55 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Dennis,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dennis Clarke
wrote:
And SPARC version is still available for download...
Let us know when you get that running.
On 20/01/2019 15:03, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 1/19/19 10:55 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Dennis,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dennis Clarke
wrote:
And SPARC version is still available for download...
Let us know when you get that running.
Install of x86 went very smooth.
The x86_64
On 1/19/19 10:55 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Dennis,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
And SPARC version is still available for download...
Let us know when you get that running.
Install of x86 went very smooth.
The x86_64 process is trivial.
And I was able to compile
Dennis,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>
> > And SPARC version is still available for download...
>
> Let us know when you get that running.
Install of x86 went very smooth.
And I was able to compile fairly recent SQLite with Oracle Studio 12.6
with just couple of
And SPARC version is still available for download...
Let us know when you get that running.
Dennis
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 1/19/19 4:47 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
>> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9)
>>
>>> It may be [worth] while to spin up a Solaris 9 zone on a Solaris 10
>>> or Solaris 11 server for
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 4:29 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> On 1/19/19 4:47 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
> > Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
> >>> SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9)
> >
> >> It may be [worth] while to spin up a Solaris 9 zone
On 1/19/19 4:47 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9)
It may be [worth] while to spin up a Solaris 9 zone on a Solaris 10 or
Solaris 11 server for this purpose.
I don't have access to
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
>> SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9)
> It may be [worth] while to spin up a Solaris 9 zone on a Solaris 10 or
> Solaris 11 server for this purpose.
I don't have access to any Solaris servers of any kind.
On 07/30/2018 03:59 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9)
It may be work while to spin up a Solaris 9 zone on a Solaris 10 or
Solaris 11 server for this purpose. Not sure how you are getting a
cross
On 2018-07-28 08:33, Andy Goth wrote:
SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9) due to
not finding fchmod, fchown, readlink, lstat, usleep, struct timeval,
and gettimeofday.
To correct, do not #define _XOPEN_SOURCE. There's already a check for
Mac OS X, so I would suggest
SQLite 3.24.0 fails to build on Solaris 9 (a.k.a. Solaris 2.9) due to
not finding fchmod, fchown, readlink, lstat, usleep, struct timeval, and
gettimeofday.
To correct, do not #define _XOPEN_SOURCE. There's already a check for
Mac OS X, so I would suggest extending the check to also exclude
14 matches
Mail list logo
