Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-25 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred Williams wrote: | Sounds like an assumption is being made that the sqlite.h file will always be present. Correct. It must be present in order to compile wrappers. | ... which most wrapper users never do. I am not talking about the users of wr

RE: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-25 Thread Fred Williams
- > From: Roger Binns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 6:52 AM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ? > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | I

Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-25 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I was thinking the same thing earlier today. | Perhaps sometime next week. Another issue is checkin 3545 which disabled the loading of extensions. ~ The problem is that those of us building wrappers for other languages have

Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-23 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I was thinking the same thing earlier today. | Perhaps sometime next week. With the new prepare_v2 api, step returns the error directly. If I ignore that and then call finalize, will finalize also return the same (correct)

RE: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-23 Thread Joe Wilson
--- Fred Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it? A list of the fixes and enhancements since the last release: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/timeline?d=100&e=2006-Dec-23&c=2&px=&s=0&dm=1&x=1&m=1 The 3.3.8 shell .dump bug alone is serious enough to warrant a releas

RE: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-23 Thread Fred Williams
If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it? > -Original Message- > From: Joe Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 12:33 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ? > > > it's been a while since 3.3.8. > > _

RE: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-23 Thread Robert Simpson
qlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ? > > Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it's been a while since 3.3.8. > > > > I was thinking the same thing earlier today. > Perhaps sometime next week. > > There have be

Re: [sqlite] ETA for SQLite 3.3.9 ?

2006-12-23 Thread drh
Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's been a while since 3.3.8. > I was thinking the same thing earlier today. Perhaps sometime next week. There have been a lot of changes lately that impact win95 and wince. I sent out email asking people to test those changes but have not gotten back a