Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-08 Thread Ladislav Bodnar
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Richard Hipp wrote: I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build products: sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip with the OS and ARCH being omitted for source-code products. In your case, you probably are looking for

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-08 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ladislav Bodnar dis...@distrowatch.com wrote: On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Richard Hipp wrote: I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build products:      sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip with the OS and ARCH being omitted for

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-08 Thread Kees Nuyt
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:35:06 -0500, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The version is still 3.7.4. It is merely encoded as 3070400 in the filename, since names like 3070400, 3070403, 3070420, 3070500, 3071200 sort into correct order when you do ls, but the corresponding real version numbers

[sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Rich Shepard
What happened to the souce tarball of the amalgamation? I'm wondering if the change to the autoconf version will break the Slackbuild script I use. Was there something wrong with the tarballs of previous versions? Rich ___ sqlite-users mailing

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:   What happened to the souce tarball of the amalgamation? I'm wondering if the change to the autoconf version will break the Slackbuild script I use.   Was there something wrong with the tarballs of previous versions?

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Richard Hipp wrote: I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build products: sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip with the OS and ARCH being omitted for source-code products. In your case, you probably are looking for Richard, That's how it's

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Ladislav Bodnar
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Richard Hipp wrote: I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build products: sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip with the OS and ARCH being omitted for source-code products. In your case, you probably are looking for

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Darren Duncan
Richard Hipp wrote: I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build products: sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip with the OS and ARCH being omitted for source-code products. In your case, you probably are looking for

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2010 08:45 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: I am also working with automated scripts, which now have to be updated to use either the new style or old style depending on the user-requested SQLite version. (DBD::SQLite bundles a SQLite version,

Re: [sqlite] SQLite-3.7.4 Amalgamation?

2010-12-07 Thread Darren Duncan
Roger Binns wrote: On 12/07/2010 08:45 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: I am also working with automated scripts, which now have to be updated to use either the new style or old style depending on the user-requested SQLite version. (DBD::SQLite bundles a SQLite version, and includes a script