At 03:21 27/07/2005, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 09:48 -0500, Jay Sprenkle wrote:
> The theory has been proposed that threads aren't better than separate
> processes, or application implemented context switching. Does anyone
> have an experiment that will prove the point either way?
Right you are. For some reason I was sure that existed. How about
defining the column as text and doing "ORDER BY + 0.0".
That won't use an index though. If you need an index you'll have
to define a collation sequence that sorts numericly.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried that but got:
hello i'm trying to open a database with VB6 without wrapper
i'm using sqlite3.dll
and it's my code :
Option Explicit
Private Declare Function sqlite3_open Lib "sqlite3.dll" (ByVal filename
As String, ByRef dbHandle As Long) As Long
Private Declare Function sqlite3_open16 Lib "sqlite3.dll"
*. new feature : support for encrypted databases (WITH the licenced
version of sqlite)
http://www.singular.gr/sqlite/
Hi,
unfortunately this has to do with the C calling convention used by sqlite3.dll.
By default DLLs compiled with C have the cdecl calling convention, but VB only
supports the stdcall calling convention.
You must recompile sqlite using MS Visual C++ or other compiler and switch the
default
Ok Thank's for your help i will trying this !!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi,
unfortunately this has to do with the C calling convention used by sqlite3.dll.
By default DLLs compiled with C have the cdecl calling convention, but VB only
supports the stdcall calling convention.
You must
From: John LeSueur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] New Query Question
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:51:54 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from sqlite.org ([67.18.92.124]) by mc11-f29.hotmail.com with
Microsoft
Cariotoglou Mike wrote:
*. new feature : support for encrypted databases (WITH the licenced
version of sqlite)
http://www.singular.gr/sqlite/
Awesome! Thanks! I was hoping that you would add encryption support.
:) (We purchased our license a few weeks ago).
However, I am unable to
Dennis Jenkins wrote:
Cariotoglou Mike wrote:
*. new feature : support for encrypted databases (WITH the licenced
version of sqlite)
http://www.singular.gr/sqlite/
Awesome! Thanks! I was hoping that you would add encryption support.
:) (We purchased our license a few weeks ago).
good to know...
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:26 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] ANN: sqlite3Explorer V 1.7
>
> Dennis Jenkins wrote:
>
> > Cariotoglou Mike wrote:
> >
> >> *. new
Hello,
It seems that the functions required for reading data without a
callback are mising in SQLite 3? I cant find "sqlite3_compile",
or "sqlite3_step". Am I missing something?
The documentation on the website describes "sqlite_compile" and
"sqlite_step" which were presumably menat to be
Hi All,
Can we use SQL Lite Database from multiple processes at the same
time. Example. I have a database called Customer.db. I want to use it from
apache server for web application and also use it from a c program running
on the server.
Regards
Sudhir Hasbe
I reread the faq hundred times but i don't understand the \000 remark.
For INSERT how can i embed BLOB data having single quote and chr(0) bytes?
Currently i replace all singlequotes with 2x single quotes and that works fine.
The chr(0) byte did not succeed.
I'm using the dll and don't do any c
in sqlite 3.x you can bind data to prepared statements, no escaping is required.
On 7/27/05, Edwin Knoppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I reread the faq hundred times but i don't understand the \000 remark.
>
> For INSERT how can i embed BLOB data having single quote and chr(0) bytes?
>
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
>At 03:21 27/07/2005, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
>>On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 09:48 -0500, Jay Sprenkle wrote:
>> > The theory has been proposed that threads aren't better than separate
>> > processes, or application implemented context switching. Does anyone
>> > have
Yes
On 7/27/05, Sudhir Hasbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Can we use SQL Lite Database from multiple processes at the same
> time. Example. I have a database called Customer.db. I want to use it from
> apache server for web application and also use it from a c program running
>
Hi,
I am using SQLite on an embedded software product.
I seem to have a problem when I update more than 6 columns within a single
record at one time. All columns are in the same table, they are either strings,
integers or dates.
I am using the SQL command:-
UPDATE PATIENTS SET
On 7/27/2005 at 16:24 djm wrote:
>Hello,
>
>It seems that the functions required for reading data without a
>callback are mising in SQLite 3? I cant find "sqlite3_compile",
>or "sqlite3_step". Am I missing something?
>
>The documentation on the website describes "sqlite_compile" and
I will look that up, read something about binding.
But *can* 'escaping' be used as alternative?
- Original Message -
From: "Cory Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Sorry, trivail question probably,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Edwin Knoppert wrote:
>I reread the faq hundred times but i don't understand the \000 remark.
>
>For INSERT how can i embed BLOB data having single quote and chr(0) bytes?
>Currently i replace all singlequotes with 2x single quotes and that works fine.
>The chr(0) byte did
It looks like libtclsqlite3.dylib either didn't get made
or is in the wrong place. You can search your disk to see
whether it got made. There's a switch in the Makefile
that determines whether it gets made or not.
OS X has been discussed several times on this list. You
might try searching the
-Original Message-
From: Mark Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:53 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] UPDATE - crash when many columns
Hi,
I am using SQLite on an embedded software product.
I seem to have a problem when I update more than
The docs are correct; you just have to read carefully.
They say that you can "rename, or add a new column to,
an existing table".
Regards
On 27/07/2005, at 13:04, Kurt Welgehausen wrote:
The docs are correct; you just have to read carefully.
I have :-)
They say that you can "rename, or add a new column to,
an existing table".
No, it doesn't.
It states that you can "rename or add a new column to an existing
table."
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:21:22PM -0400, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
> That's incorrect. Threading increases development time and produces less
> stable applications. In fairness: it's the skill level of the engineer
Mrs. Brisby, that is probably quite correct in at least one particular
sense, but since
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 23:20 -0400, Kervin L. Pierre wrote:
> We get all those threads related questions because SQLite
> is difficult to use with threads and has sparse sometimes
> conflicting documentation on the subject.
Maybe people think that SQLite should serialize its own internals. Maybe
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 09:08 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> At 03:21 27/07/2005, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
> >On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 09:48 -0500, Jay Sprenkle wrote:
> > > The theory has been proposed that threads aren't better than separate
> > > processes, or application implemented context switching. Does
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 13:31 -0400, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:21:22PM -0400, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
>
> > That's incorrect. Threading increases development time and produces less
> > stable applications. In fairness: it's the skill level of the engineer
...
> When people -
28 matches
Mail list logo