Hello
Since PHP5's embedded SQLite is 2.8.17, I downloaded the CLI client
sqlite-2.8.17.bin.gz from the "Historical Binaries And Source Code" section
of the site, but it also requires the lib.so to work.
Problem is, sqlite-source-2_8_17.zip only contains the .c files, not a
Makefile. How
Hi,
Is there any limitation on the number of elements in IN clause ?
Can one have, e.g. thousands of elements ? Also, can having
to many elements become inefficient at some point and one
has to use some other technique, i.e. comparing elements one
by one in a loop ?
Thanks in advance.
Felix.
>SELECT * FROM maintable WHERE key IN stuff;
Thanks for that tip. Didn't know you could do that.
Can't remember this as standard SQL.
RBS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 January 2008 12:40
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re:
Felix Radensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any limitation on the number of elements in IN clause ?
> Can one have, e.g. thousands of elements ? Also, can having
> to many elements become inefficient at some point and one
> has to use some other technique, i.e. comparing
"Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it is standard SQL. At the very least, it doesn't work in
> MSSQL. Standard is
>
> SELECT * FROM maintable WHERE key IN (select x from stuff);
>
> SQLite shortened version is much nicer.. wish it was standard.
>
SQLite also
Just experimented with the short-hand version. It seems to work only
when the "stuff" table has a single field, although the field name
doesn't matter. More than one field causes a query error, even if the
field name being compared is in the table.
I've actually never seen this notation, but it
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:07:01AM +0100, Ralf Junker wrote:
> Hello Bharath Booshan L,
>
> >>select * from t where filepath regexp '/MyMovie(\.[^\.]+)*$';
> >
> >Will this query use index, if we had one, on filepath?
>
> No. It will do a full table scan.
But it could, no?
I suppose that to
Yes, this is standard SQL. The syntax is:
SELECT * from maintable where key IN (SELECT key from anothertable)
-Original Message-
From: RB Smissaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:54 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: RE: [sqlite] Number of elements in
Hi
I succeed in the compilation of SQLite under FreeBSD 5.4.
This is the French documentation I wrote:
http://fredericdelagoublaye.free.fr/freebsd/install/sqlite.html
I hope you will find some clues to help you
Best Regards
Frédéric de la Goublaye
On Jan 28, 2008 5:25 PM, Rob Sciuk <[EMAIL
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:59:40 +0100, Gilles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello
>
>Since PHP5's embedded SQLite is 2.8.17, I downloaded the CLI client
>sqlite-2.8.17.bin.gz from the "Historical Binaries And Source Code" section
>of the site, but it also requires the lib.so to work.
>
>Problem is,
Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:07:01AM +0100, Ralf Junker wrote:
> > Hello Bharath Booshan L,
> >
> > >>select * from t where filepath regexp '/MyMovie(\.[^\.]+)*$';
> > >
> > >Will this query use index, if we had one, on filepath?
> >
> > No. It will do
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:35 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] How to specify regular expression in a query?
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:22:08PM +0100, Ralf Junker wrote:
> > I
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:22:08PM +0100, Ralf Junker wrote:
> I believe that this API would also ease implementations of Unicode
> LIKE and GLOB.
That's what I was thinking of. The Unicode extensions work by
redefining the like, glob and regexp functions, and by adding
collations. But surely
Hello Nicolas Williams,
>I suppose that to make this generic so that users can replace the
>regexp, like, and glob functions would require some new interfaces.
I believe so, too. The like and glob optimization is part of where.c and
outside the reach of sqlite3_create_function().
>SQLite would
Hey all,
I'm thinking about upgrading to v3.5.4 the latest SQLite from v3.4.0 for the
next release of Run BASIC, and I'm wondering about a couple of things:
1) Do I need to change the way I make calls to the database engine? Is the
API the same? I probably wouldn't have too much trouble
My mistake:
Of course, in the design A, the resp in while (resp == xxx) refers to the
result in the prepare statement sqlite3_prepare_v2()
Adolfo
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/28/08, Carl Gundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I understand it, Apple's Mac OS X comes with SQLite as part of its Mail
> app.
It is not so much that "OS X comes with SQLite" as part of its
Mail.app. It is more like OS X allows one to create persistent data
stores using multiple
I don't have PostrgreSQL installed, but the docs say IN requires a subquery.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/functions-subquery.html
MySQL does not support this syntax either (that one I tested).
Sam
---
We're Hiring! Seeking a
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, L. S. wrote:
Why doesn't SQLite 3.5.4 compile under FreeBSD 5.3? Can it be done in a sane
manner?
AFAIK, it just works, but you may require the -lc_r option to include the
re-entrant (threadsafe) C library with your linked executeable ...
How can I link against
I don't think it is standard SQL. At the very least, it doesn't work in
MSSQL. Standard is
SELECT * FROM maintable WHERE key IN (select x from stuff);
SQLite shortened version is much nicer.. wish it was standard.
Sam
---
We're Hiring!
Hi:
Assuming that the definition of the dBase does not change, I wonder if the
two pseudo code schemas are equally valid or if there are pros and cons in
each one:
// Design -A-
do {
// Compile the statement into a virtual machine
resp =
As I understand it, Apple's Mac OS X comes with SQLite as part of its Mail
app. Is there some way to leverage this to avoid distributing SQLite with
Mac apps? Has anyone tried this, or is it a bad idea?
I'm assuming that I can have my own copy of SQLite packaged with my OS X
application and it
drh-2 wrote:
>
> "P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Most folks though install their own version of SQLite under the
>> /usr/local tree ...
>
> Why do people feel like they need SQLite to be a seperately
> library? It is *designed* to be statically linked.
Yes, but not everyone uses
Carl Gundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm thinking about upgrading to v3.5.4 the latest SQLite from v3.4.0 for the
> next release of Run BASIC, and I'm wondering about a couple of things:
>
> 1) Do I need to change the way I make calls to the database engine? Is the
> API the
"P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most folks though install their own version of SQLite under the
> /usr/local tree ...
Why do people feel like they need SQLite to be a seperately
library? It is *designed* to be statically linked.
--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What I did was used the SQLite sources and added them into a Carbon
framework. Then set sqlite3.h and the other source header to public.
That way I could call the functions. Then i set the installation path
to @executable_path/../Frameworks, then added a new copy phase and
copied the
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Most folks though install their own version of SQLite under the
> > /usr/local tree ...
>
> Why do people feel like they need SQLite to be a seperately
> library? It is *designed* to be
Hello Bharath Booshan L,
>>select * from t where filepath regexp '/MyMovie(\.[^\.]+)*$';
>
>Will this query use index, if we had one, on filepath?
No. It will do a full table scan.
Ralf
-
To unsubscribe, send email
Hello All,
Is there any difference in speed of access for unique and usual index?
--
Alexander Batyrshin aka bash
bash = Biomechanica Artificial Sabotage Humanoid
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
The example for question 11 in the FAQ has this code for dropping an
existing table column 'c'
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t1_backup(a,b);
INSERT INTO t1_backup SELECT a,b FROM t1;
DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
INSERT INTO t1 SELECT a,b FROM t1_backup;
DROP TABLE
Lothar Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The example for question 11 in the FAQ has this code for dropping an
> existing table column 'c'
>
> BEGIN TRANSACTION;
> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t1_backup(a,b);
> INSERT INTO t1_backup SELECT a,b FROM t1;
> DROP TABLE t1;
> CREATE TABLE
Hello Igor,
Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 9:06:56 AM, you wrote:
IT> Lothar Scholz
IT> wrote:
>> This is copying the whole table twice. Is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't be:
>>
>> BEGIN TRANSACTION;
>> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t1_backup(a,b);
>> INSERT INTO t1_backup SELECT a,b FROM t1;
>>
Lothar Scholz
wrote:
This is copying the whole table twice. Is there any reason why it
shouldn't be:
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t1_backup(a,b);
INSERT INTO t1_backup SELECT a,b FROM t1;
DROP TABLE t1;
ALTER TABLE t1_backup RENAME TO t1;
COMMIT;
t1_backup is a temporary table.
Lothar Scholz
wrote:
Transactions do not rewind drop table statements and other schema
manipulations.
That's not true. Schema changes, including DROP TABLE statemens, done
within a transaction can be happily rolled back. Just try it and see.
Igor Tandetnik
I have
id, name, .., title, rank
1, a, .., foo, 5
1, a, .., bar, 4
1, a, .., bar, 7
2, b, .., baz, 6
2, b, .., qux, 9
and so on
I want
1, a, .., bar, 7
2, b, .., qux, 9
that is, all the rows for each name where title is the highest.
SELECT id, name, .., title, MAX(rank)
FROM table
GROUP BY
Puneet,
I'm assuming you meant to say "where rank is the highest" rather than
title, as that's what your example shows.
Here's the syntax:
select * from table a
where rank = (select max(rank) from table b where b.id = a.id)
- Jeff
-Original Message-
From: P Kishor [mailto:[EMAIL
On Jan 28, 2008 2:45 PM, Alexander Batyrshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
> Is there any difference in speed of access for unique and usual index?
no, it is only a constraint when inserting.
--
Cory Nelson
On 1/28/08, Fowler, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Puneet,
>
> I'm assuming you meant to say "where rank is the highest" rather than
> title, as that's what your example shows.
indeed.
>
> Here's the syntax:
> select * from table a
> where rank = (select max(rank) from table b where b.id =
Hello experts,
How can I instruct GLOB function to perform case-insensitive search similar
to LIKE. Can I?
--
Bharath
On 1/30/08 10:30 AM, "Bharath Booshan L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the inputs experts,
>
> I am using SQLite 3.4.0 on Mac OS X Leapord, and using regexp in my
Thanks for the inputs experts,
I am using SQLite 3.4.0 on Mac OS X Leapord, and using regexp in my query
reports an error
SQL error: no such function: regexp
I tried to use the query using GLOB and another query which separates
FilePath into Dirpath and FileName and uses LIKE comparison.
Both
40 matches
Mail list logo
