> On Nov 2, 2018, at 12:50 AM, Thomas Kurz wrote:
>
> My opinion is that the logic for database queries should be held together
> with the data.
Why? The logic has to be in the application itself (where else would it come
from?) to copy into the database in the first place. So why create a
P.S.
Here are the first few lines of 'fossil timeline' on my local that I am
building.
=== 2018-11-02 ===
17:38:39 [1fa74930ab] Enhance triggers so that they can use
table-valued-functions that exist in schemas outside of the schema in which
the trigger is defined. (user: drh)
=== 2018-10-31 ===
Hi,
Sorry. I have had no luck with this.
I followed the instructions here
https://www.sqlite.org/getthecode.html#clone
then built from source following the directions in README.md.
mkdir bld;# Build will occur in a sibling directory
cd bld ;# Change to
Ok. I am a fossil newbie. My effort to build from that did not work. The
amalgamation from configure+make seemed incomplete and other files like
json1.c were missing.
I am on trunk and fossil timeline showed Dr Hipp's fix. I'll educate
myself a bit more on Fossil to see where I went wrong.
configure --enable-load-extension --enable-threadsafe --with-readline-lib=auto
--with-pic --enable-json1 --enable-fts3 --enable-fts4 --enable-fts5
--enable-rtree --enable-session --enable-update-limit --enable-geopoly
Adjust the configure parameters to include what you want included.
---
Works for me using Lindsay's original scripts.
3.26.0 2018-11-02 17:38:39
1fa74930ab56171e2e840d4a5b259abafb0ad1e0320fc3030066570a6dd1alt2
---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>-Original Message-
My opinion is that the logic for database queries should be held together with
the data. I don't think that embedded vs. non-embedded makes a difference here.
One could as well use a MySQL or whatsoever database, and the application code
still owned and create the database. This will always be
Thanks for the very detailed info. I am certainly a lot wiser now!
Graham
On 01-11-2018 11:40 pm, R Smith wrote:
On 2018/11/01 9:51 AM, Graham Hardman wrote:
I am pleased about this, although still puzzled by the fact that the
windows LoadLibrary call returned a non null pointer and windows
> R Smith:
>
> Simply add a column to any select like this: et voila...
I tried without "partition by 1" and that works as well: "row_number() OVER ()"
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
INSERT INTO TestReal values (9223372036854775807);INSERT INTO
TestReal values (9223372036854775807 - 1);INSERT INTO TestReal values
(9223372036854775807 - 2);INSERT INTO TestReal values
(9223372036854775807 - 3);sqlite>...>...>...>...>
I recognize that number on sight and it
I did a little Python script to go find what the data was that was actually
being stored. They're each getting stored as serial type 6: "Value is a
big-endian 64-bit twos-complement integer."
So apparently unique indexes consider uniqueness based on the *stored* value,
whereas distinct
Thank you for the clarification.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 6:03 PM Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 10/31/18, Roman Ivasyshyn wrote:
> >
> > I faced with an issue of creating int array with the same name without
> > closing connection.
>
> That is not allowed. But you can use sqlite3_intarray_bind() to
Thanks!
As a further note, I also tried building the shell with JSON1 enabled and
building and loading the json1 extension separately, with the same results.
SQLite version 3.25.2 2018-09-25 19:08:10
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME"
Please try your test script on the latest trunk check-in and let us
know whether or not it is working for you.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
This check-in is done so that trigger programs can use table-valued-functions.
But it seems to me that the correct way should be to check if it is a eponymous
virtual table; whether it uses table-valued-function syntax or not is
irrelevant. Since, eponymous virtual tables do not belong to any
Has anyone else run into this issue? Is there a workaround?
I have the following tables and trigger
- Data table
CREATE TABLE people (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
created TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
name TEXT,
age INTEGER
);
-- Change log table
CREATE TABLE change_log (
Has anyone else run into this issue?
I have the following tables and trigger
- Data table
CREATE TABLE people (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
created TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
name TEXT,
age INTEGER
);
-- Change log table
CREATE TABLE change_log (
id INTEGER PRIMARY
On 11/2/18, Lindsay Lawrence wrote:
> Has anyone else run into this issue?
I can confirm that it is an issue and that we are working on it.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
Thanks. In my case there is no installer as such. My vba code runs
inside the same process as the host cad system. In this case Bricscad
has already loaded their copy of dqlite3.dll and my like-named file
could not demand precedence.
Graham
On 02-11-2018 3:16 am, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 1
19 matches
Mail list logo
