Does anybody knows the exact code, a little hack where can I free up the
memory, I don't want it to use it for future requests.
Even drop table consumes memory. :-(.
If we are doing in-memory database operation, why do we want to maintain the
free'd memory pages?
I think If Mr. Hipp answers, it
ter solution, please let me know.
On 8/9/07, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- "Babu, Lokesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anybody knows the exact code, a little hack where can I free up the
> > memory, I don't want it to use it for future
refer *In-Memory Database: Delete rows on a Table increases the memory usage
*
More help needed or didn't understand, let me know.
On 8/17/07, Sreedhar.a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Marcus
>
>
>
> I am working in 3.3.6 version.
>
> I created a table with id as integer primary key
I was trying the following piece of code (see below),
The requirement here is very simple, I want the t_id field or ROWID
field to be regenerated sequentially even after delete has been
performed.
In the below code, I have created a table with 3 fields, Inserted 1000
records, Deleted some middle
Thanks Simon, Time being I was looking for the same. Thanks again for the help.
On 8/31/07, Simon Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31/08/2007, Babu, Lokesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was trying the following piece of code (see below),
> >
> > The r
Dear All,
Does anyone help me out, What is FTS1, How to use FTS1, If any sample
programs to use FTS1 and understand better.
Thanks in advance.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
Why a VIEW doesn't contain a ROWID field. Even though if it is
accessed, it contains (null) value. How to initialise this or how to
make it work as in TABLE.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
After doing some SELECT operation on a TABLE, say we get 100 result
items out of 1000 records, Is there any way where I can iterate
through this result set. i.e., Get N items out of 100, say get
previous 10, get next 10, etc,
This should be done without creating a temporary table or
This I know, but the thing is, I want the ROWID in VIEW to be
sequential even after a SELECT with some condition has been executed,
ie., from 1 to n. Just like in normal table. In your case it is not
like that.
By the way, what I mean to say is, why don't we have default ROWID in
VIEW like as in
#ifdef SQLITE_INT64_TYPE
typedef SQLITE_INT64_TYPE sqlite_int64;
typedef unsigned SQLITE_INT64_TYPE sqlite_uint64;
#elif defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
typedef __int64 sqlite_int64;
typedef unsigned __int64 sqlite_uint64;
#else
typedef long long sqlite_int64;
typedef
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the information.
One more question, As you said, Full text builds an index of data, so
I hope you have done some memory analysis too, could you please tell
me the memory usage based on your analysis.
On 9/4/07, Scott Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2
Dear All,
I have a piece of code which is shown below, Im doing In-Memory database
operation
I have done these settings in SQLite, in btree.h SQLITE_DEFAULT_AUTOVACUUM =
1, TEMP_STORE=2 in sqliteint.h (this should be made compulsory, if
concentrating only on in-memorydatabase, where no disk is
Dear All,
I have a piece of code which is shown below, Im doing In-Memory database
operation
I have done these settings in SQLite, in btree.h SQLITE_DEFAULT_AUTOVACUUM =
1, TEMP_STORE=2 in sqliteint.h (this should be made compulsory, if
concentrating only on in-memorydatabase, where no disk is
Dear All,
Say I have 3 columns in one Table, with one INTEGER, two TEXT columns, If
ROWID is manually inserted and made descending for 1 records from 1
to 1, (or even if random number for ROWID - both these cases), the memory
occupied is more. Why is this so?
Is that indexing happens, If
fragmentation.
> >
> > Which sqlite version, operating system, and malloc implementation are
> you using?
> >
> > --- "Babu, Lokesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Say I have 3 columns in one Table, with one INTEGER, two TEXT columns,
>
integer keys and all data at the
> leaves)
> > ** and the new entry is the right-most entry in the tree (it has the
> > ** largest key) then use the special balance_quick() routine for
> > ** balancing. balance_quick() is much faster and results in a tighter
> > *
Hi all,
Does anyone analysed the sqlite3 database output file by opening the file in
some hex editor.
Is it possible to create one such database file without using sqlite.i.e.,
is it possible to write the contents without using sqlite and later read the
contents using sqlite.
or say if I have a
17 matches
Mail list logo