Hi sqlite list,
By default, linux gcc does not appear to remove information and
therefore final binaries tend to be larger than they need to be if you
use stable versions of compiled binaries. Many people don't tend to
realize this and therefore compile files larger than necessary if their
If read a bit already and see limitations and benefits in SQlite.
Our office still wants to use the GUI present in MS-Access.
I like the simplicity of maintaining SQLite plus it's rollback features
etc. Later, there are aspirations for a webbrowser interface to same
database.
Anyone have
On February 19, 2006 06:45 pm, Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Hi there.
> I would need the sources of an older version (3.1.2) of SQLite.
> Are they still available for download?
If nobody has it, go to google and search for these 3 words:
sqlite 3.1.2 rpm
or
sqlite 3.1.2 tar.gz
The response is many
top
> of the database. Access does tend to trash its database files if used
> by multiple users on a network. If you connect to sqlite files via
> odbc they should be ok though. Backup your mdb file to be safe!
>
> On 2/19/06, Jose Da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On February 21, 2006 12:48 pm, Jay Sprenkle wrote:
> Sqlite has been very fast for me. If you need raw blazing
Well, sqlite is definitely fast in relation to other sqls, but every sql
has overhead, and they all can't match direct access of a
flattish-file-format by a computer doing it's own
On February 21, 2006 05:43 pm, Jiao wrote:
> all
> I 'm designing an embedded system,Our system have limited flash,there
> are much datas required to manage, but not all the data required to
> save into flash,just leave them in ramdisk. so I intend to design two
> db file ,one in flash and another
On February 22, 2006 05:59 am, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:11:45AM +0200, Ulrich Sch?bel wrote:
> > I tried your script and got, after a slight modification, quite
> > consistent results. When I tried it as is, I got slightly varying
> > time results with a peak in the 50 to 100
On February 27, 2006 06:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > look i have over 600 temp file i cannot remove or delete why is
> > this. they all start with sqlite_ then there is another over 600
> > files with 3k memory, but the sqlite_ files have ok memory
>
> I'm
On March 14, 2006 12:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am having real problems with SQLite on Windows CE (.NET 4.1 and
> Pocket PC 2003). I have tried everything and it seems that there is a
> memory leak with SQLite on Windows CE. I have test it with SQLite
> versions 3.2.2 and 3.3.4
On March 14, 2006 01:49 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello again,
> Thank for your answers:
> first of all thank you who pointed that i should use a close(db) at
> line 17 and call sqlite3_free_table(result) even if there was an
> error, but these solutions didn´t solve my problem (the
On May 2, 2006 09:42 pm, E Tse wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am planing to use sqlite for a project involving huge data. The
> planned sqlite file (which will contain a single table) will grow to
> more than 4g in size. Has anyone try that before and what problems
> have you encountered?
Some operating
11 matches
Mail list logo
