[sqlite] Failed tests on ppc64

2016-12-20 Thread Petr Kubat
Hi everyone, I hit some failures in fts3conf.test while buidling latest version of sqlite for the ppc64 architecture: ! fts3conf-3.1 expected: [X'01000200'] ! fts3conf-3.1 got: [X'00010002'] ! fts3conf-3.2 expected: [X'02000300'] ! fts3conf-3.2 got:

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.21.0 bug? SELECT CAST ('9223372036854775807 ' AS NUMERIC);

2017-11-01 Thread Petr Kubat
Encountering this in Fedora as well while trying to package latest 3.21.0 version. Only on i386. Additionally the test suite fails on some architectures (aarch64, ppc64, s390x) when running the test case fts3expr5-1.5: ! fts3expr5-1.5 expected: [1 {invalid matchinfo blob passed to function

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.21.0 bug? SELECT CAST ('9223372036854775807 ' AS NUMERIC);

2018-01-23 Thread Petr Kubat
information I can provide to get this looked at? On 11/01/2017 01:07 PM, Petr Kubat wrote: Encountering this in Fedora as well while trying to package latest 3.21.0 version. Only on i386. Additionally the test suite fails on some architectures (aarch64, ppc64, s390x) when running the test case

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.21.0 fts3rank test failure on big-endian linux

2018-01-24 Thread Petr Kubat
On 01/24/2018 03:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 1/24/18, Petr Kubat <pku...@redhat.com> wrote: I am hitting a failure in fts3rank test on big-endian architectures (ppc64, s390x; logs in [1][2]) running Fedora rawhide: Should now be fixed on trunk. Thanks! I can verify that the fts3ran

[sqlite] sqlite 3.21.0 fts3rank test failure on big-endian linux

2018-01-24 Thread Petr Kubat
Hi all, I am hitting a failure in fts3rank test on big-endian architectures (ppc64, s390x; logs in [1][2]) running Fedora rawhide: Time: fts3query.test 515 ms ! fts3expr5-1.5 expected: [1 {invalid matchinfo blob passed to function rank()}] ! fts3expr5-1.5 got: [1 {wrong number of

[sqlite] sqlite 3.22.0 walro2 test failures on ppc64

2018-02-04 Thread Petr Kubat
Hi all, hitting some failures when building 3.22.0 on ppc64 boxes (both big-endian and little-endian) running Fedora Rawhide (full logs in [1][2]): Time: walro.test 135 ms ! walro2-1.3.2.2 expected: [0 32768] ! walro2-1.3.2.2 got: [0 65536] ! walro2-1.3.3.0 expected: [4224 32768] !

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.22.0 walro2 test failures on ppc64

2018-02-05 Thread Petr Kubat
On 02/05/2018 08:41 AM, Petr Kubat wrote: Hi all, hitting some failures when building 3.22.0 on ppc64 boxes (both big-endian and little-endian) running Fedora Rawhide (full logs in [1][2]): Time: walro.test 135 ms ! walro2-1.3.2.2 expected: [0 32768] ! walro2-1.3.2.2 got:  [0 65536

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.22.0 walro2 test failures on ppc64

2018-02-06 Thread Petr Kubat
bZeroShm {0 1} { Petr On 02/05/2018 02:29 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote: On 02/05/2018 04:22 PM, Petr Kubat wrote: On 02/05/2018 08:41 AM, Petr Kubat wrote: Hi all, hitting some failures when building 3.22.0 on ppc64 boxes (both big-endian and little-endian) running Fedora Rawhide (full logs in [1][2

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.21.0 bug? SELECT CAST ('9223372036854775807 ' AS NUMERIC);

2018-01-24 Thread Petr Kubat
Thanks for the patch! Tests on i686 are green when included. There are still some failures for other architectures but I will make separate threads for these once I investigate. Petr On 01/23/2018 06:35 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 1/23/18, Petr Kubat <pku...@redhat.com> wrote: Still p

[sqlite] sqlite 3.23.0 zipfile2 test failures

2018-04-12 Thread Petr Kubat
Hello everyone, I have recently rebased Fedora's version of sqlite to 3.23.0 and saw some failures in one of the zipfile2 test cases during running self-tests (full logs [1]): Time: zipfile.test 193 ms ! zipfile2-2.0 expected: [1 {error in fread()}] ! zipfile2-2.0 got: [0 {}]

Re: [sqlite] sqlite 3.23.0 zipfile2 test failures

2018-04-12 Thread Petr Kubat
Actually forgot to append the link tot he full logs so one more mail to fix it: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7200/26137200/build.log On 04/12/2018 02:23 PM, Petr Kubat wrote: Hello everyone, I have recently rebased Fedora's version of sqlite to 3.23.0 and saw some failures