Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Flash memory

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Bohme

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Has anyone experimented with putting SQLite directly on the
Linux MTD flash interface?  I.e. by-passing JFSS2.  Would this
offer any kind of significant efficiency benefit?  
 



JFFS2 is designed to wear the flash evenly, preventing you from 
'drilling holes' by writing to any single block more than others and 
wearing it out faster.  If there is a performance gain to be had by 
going directly to flash, you lose the robustness and leveling properties 
of the JFFS2.  Unless of course the 'direct to flash' implementation 
accounts for power loss, bad blocks and wear leveling I'd be loathe to 
give up JFFS2.


 -P



[sqlite] SQLite and Flash memory

2005-12-31 Thread d . webb
Has anyone experimented with putting SQLite directly on the
Linux MTD flash interface?  I.e. by-passing JFSS2.  Would this
offer any kind of significant efficiency benefit?  

-dw