On 11/18/10 8:57 PM, "Dan Kennedy" wrote:
On 11/19/2010 05:22 AM, Duquette, William H (316H) wrote:
> On 11/18/10 2:16 PM, "Drake Wilson" wrote:
>
> Quoth "Duquette, William H (316H)", on
> 2010-11-18 14:08:10 -0800:
>> It seems to me that it shouldn't be necessary for SQLite to evaluate
>> FOO
On 11/19/2010 05:22 AM, Duquette, William H (316H) wrote:
> On 11/18/10 2:16 PM, "Drake Wilson" wrote:
>
> Quoth "Duquette, William H (316H)", on
> 2010-11-18 14:08:10 -0800:
>> It seems to me that it shouldn't be necessary for SQLite to evaluate
>> FOO's comparison function when doing queries on
On 11/18/10 2:16 PM, "Drake Wilson" wrote:
Quoth "Duquette, William H (316H)" , on
2010-11-18 14:08:10 -0800:
> It seems to me that it shouldn't be necessary for SQLite to evaluate
> FOO's comparison function when doing queries on mytable; the
> collation order should be implicit in the mykey co
Quoth "Duquette, William H (316H)" , on
2010-11-18 14:08:10 -0800:
> It seems to me that it shouldn't be necessary for SQLite to evaluate
> FOO's comparison function when doing queries on mytable; the
> collation order should be implicit in the mykey column's index. Is
> this in fact the case?
W
4 matches
Mail list logo