Re: [SQLObject] help with TimestampCol()

2008-12-12 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:57:04PM -0500, inhahe wrote: > That worked! > > > I think you need TimestampCol(default=None) on creation. Can you test it > > and report if it works? Then I will add to my TODO to make this the > > default. Thank you for the report. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann

Re: [SQLObject] help with TimestampCol()

2008-12-12 Thread inhahe
That worked! On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Oleg Broytmann wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:21:04PM -0500, inhahe wrote: >> Can someone help me understand this? I thought the whole point of a >> TimestampCol was to automatically stamp the creation of a record with >> the current time and da

Re: [SQLObject] help with TimestampCol()

2008-12-12 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:21:04PM -0500, inhahe wrote: > Can someone help me understand this? I thought the whole point of a > TimestampCol was to automatically stamp the creation of a record with > the current time and date -- otherwise you might as well use a > DateTimeCol. yet when i try to c

[SQLObject] help with TimestampCol()

2008-12-12 Thread inhahe
Can someone help me understand this? I thought the whole point of a TimestampCol was to automatically stamp the creation of a record with the current time and date -- otherwise you might as well use a DateTimeCol. yet when i try to create a new instance of a table with a TimestampCol without spec