Michael,
Thanks! That may be it. I'm working to get tracks in single folders rather
than in nested subfolders. I think this may be why my opera albums of
Wagner's four Ring operas end up as they do.
Guy
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 11:05 PM Michael Herger wrote:
> > A question if I may ... if tracks
A question if I may ... if tracks are in separate folders, does the
scanner treat them as, somehow, separate, even if they have the same
Album, Artist, AlbumArtist, Genre, and Composer?
Yes, I believe the folder is used to distinguish albums of the same
artist and name. Some collectors have
Michael,
A question if I may ... if tracks are in separate folders, does the
scanner treat them as, somehow, separate, even if they have the same
Album, Artist, AlbumArtist, Genre, and Composer?
That may be what's going on, if this is true.
Thanks,
Guy
On 3/4/21 3:56 AM, Michael Herger
All seems to be well now thank you guys, i found the issue with the
playlist progression etc and the new controller is working great.
Thanks for all your help
rik81h's Profile:
Have you tried using mp3tag's View -> Extended Tags option?
This was a revelation to me when I discovered it a few years ago. There
can be so much unwanted junk tagged away which you never see in the main
interface - these days I happily blow away all the tags I don't want.
You may well have
Maybe an issue with my outdated LMS (8.0.0 - 1605892076 @ Fri Nov 20)?
But it isn't maintained anymore by Pinkdot
Yeah, I'd strongly recommend to update. There are quite a few threads
talking about alternatives to the pinkdot package.
___
mherger wrote:
> You're saying you're not using TIDAL? Or any other online service? Then
> start by disabling the Online Music Library Integration plugin.
>
> But that still shouldn't cause any issue...
I do use TIDAL.. but not seen any issues there, yet...
Maybe an issue with my outdated
Rescan of just my MP3 folder aborts with the following error message in
Scanner Log:
Code:
main::main (348) Error: Failed when running scan post-process: [Can't locate object method
"url" via package "Slim::Networking::SqueezeNetwork::Sync" at
Hi,
Rescan of just my MP3 folder aborts with the following error message in
Scanner Log:
Code:
main::main (348) Error: Failed when running scan post-process: [Can't
locate object method "url" via package "Slim::Networking::SqueezeNetwork::Sync"
at
However with the latest update I am not able to play any remotely stored
music files. Initially the music was visible in the player but never
played. I then did a complete rescan with the result that no remotely
stored music files are visible. The rescan stops after a second or so.
Are you
Hi all
I am running LMS on a brand new MacBook Air with the latest M1 processor
and 16 Mb RAM. After som initial problem the server have been running
fine for a few months
However with the latest update I am not able to play any remotely stored
music files. Initially the music was visible in
bpa wrote:
> OK - then it is definitely an issue about the player "preferring" the
> old LMS. I've seen something similar as I test with multiple LMS and
> some player keep migrating back to LMS which are not running.
>
> Assuming the pciorep[layer does not have any command line options
>
fominator wrote:
> I installed LMA on piCorePlayer several days ago for the first time and
> it works that way since than.
OK - then it is definitely an issue about the player "preferring" the
old LMS. I've seen something similar as I test with multiple LMS and
some player keep migrating back
Doesn't matter if i use the original version of trackstat from Erland or
the modified one by myself which prevents duplicate musicbrainz_id.
But as i said. the plugin is according to logs doing nothing.
As you know how to edit the plugin (and you've done so), just add log
statements wherever
So that is one album of 40 tracks but each has a different cover image?
I suspect LMS thinks that because they have different covers they are
different albums.
No, the album grouping doesn't take cover into account. Covers are
evaluated long after the album grouping. Check tags, in particular
bpa wrote:
> OK how about the other questions.
>
> Has this problem started recently or was it always this way ?
>
> If it is new, has there been a system or Firefox upfdate - firefox have
> been steadily increasing security levels with each release.
I installed LMA on piCorePlayer several
bpa wrote:
> Can you clarify the CPU load figure and how many cores on the system.
>
> On some systems with 4 cores if LMS took 100% of a core it could show
> 25% overall but detailed CPU display would show 100% on one core.
>
> Is the 25% on a single core or overall ?
the system has 4
mamema wrote:
> yes, you've said it -> trackstat.
>
> It is/was trackstat. Completely disable this plugin and the CPU load
> from 25% to 2%.
> But! The usual, enable debugging on plugin doesn't help here. As
> trackstat according to the log, does nothing. The plugin is activated,
> but doing
I know there is a tick box to enable or disable cross-fading between
different sample rates but this has no effect for me. It has been
discussed in later posts here
https://github.com/Logitech/slimserver/issues/447
Does this work for anyone?
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
yes, you've said it -> trackstat.
It is/was trackstat. Completely disable this plugin and the CPU load
from 25% to 2%.
But! The usual, enable debugging on plugin doesn't help here. As
trackstat according to the log, does nothing. The plugin is activated,
but doing nothing (according to logs)
So that is one album of 40 tracks but each has a different cover image?
I suspect LMS thinks that because they have different covers they are
different albums.
Test the theory by giving them all the same cover (make a backup copy
first).
VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS)
[B]Living Room*
Two suggestions:
1. Have you flagged the album as a compilation via the COMPILATION tag?
<---I always flag compilations this way.
2. Have you populated the ALBUM ARTIST tag? And if so, what with? <---
I think some people advocate using "Various Artists" in this tag, but
it's not the way I
gstalnaker wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why my LMS v8, even after a complete rescan this
> afternoon (it did this before the rescan by the way), shows some albums
> as if they are not albums but individual tracks? Like this (an "album"
> with 40+ tracks, different artists and NO year, but all in
23 matches
Mail list logo
