Apesbrain wrote:
> Once you've confirmed this was the problem, please post your experience
> over at Audacity forums.
I could check that *it is not Audacity* which writes my flac files with
wrong permissions.
It's either one of my metaflac scripts or Easytag. I still have to check
that.
Apesbrain wrote:
> There isn't much else.
Permissions? Permissions! I really have to learn more about linux.
Once you've confirmed this was the problem, please post your experience
over at Audacity forums. Migrating file permissions is something, if
possible, I'd think they would want
reinholdk wrote:
> Yet another idea: Did you compare file permissions already?
Bingo ! Shame on me !!! It's so obvious, it's the first thing I should
have checked first. I don't know why, some tracks had no access right
for anyone apart from the owner (me). I suspect that it is Audacity who
delisle wrote:
> At the time "Export Multiple" is executed a dialog window is opened for
> each new track giving the user the possibility of editing tags.
> The album which exhibits the issue is an opera recording. Most of
> original tracks contain recitatives and arias together. Sometime I
Yet another idea: Did you compare file permissions already?
reinholdk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36070
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109181
Mnyb wrote:
> Correct, i meant to say that dot in the beginning of a file or
> Folder name makes it hidden. The character is not forbidden but LMS wont
> see hidden files.
Sure, no file name in my library has a heading dot. All track names are
of the form:
delisle wrote:
> Thanks Mnyb for your advice.
> In Linux max lengths are 4096 bytes for the file path and 255 bytes for
> the file name (basename).
> Dots are not forbidden characters in linux file names. I tried to
> replace them by hyphens, but as expected it did not solve the issue.
> Also I
But didn't OP say the problem remained even when the .dot was replaced?
Let me try one more idea: is it possible the missing tracks are there
but under a different artist/album? Have you loaded the files into a
tag editor (e.g. Mp3tag) to see if there are any inconsistent tags
stopping these
Linux can do much more than 255 characters in a file path .
Beware of the total path length if you mount a disc under some other
folder.
I usually trim track names to bare minimum as most are in the tags
anyway.
Look out for forbidden characters in the file name in linux is
formexample dot .
Admittedly I'm fishing a bit, but I can't help noticing that is a long
file name. Is it possible some of your files are hitting up against
Windows (assuming Windows is your server) limits on path length?
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247(v=vs.85).aspx#maxpath
dasmueller wrote:
> You might try-
>
> 02 Act 1 scene 1.1 Duetto Cinque dieci venti
>
> eliminating the _
Thank you for your suggestion dasmueller. However every flac files in my
library has underscores in their name and so far it has not caused any
issue.
You might try-
02 Act 1 scene 1.1 Duetto Cinque dieci venti
eliminating the _
dasmueller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38035
View this thread:
When I have seen missing tracks in an album of flac files, it is
sometimes there are particular characters in the filename or directory
path, so it might be worth checking out the filenames of the missing
tracks. I think that forbidden characters may be different for different
operating systems
>From xiph.org:
SEEKTABLE: This is an optional block for storing seek points. It is
possible to seek to any given sample in a FLAC stream without a seek
table, but the delay can be unpredictable since the bitrate may vary
widely within a stream. By adding seek points to a stream, this delay
can
Apesbrain wrote:
> Have used Audacity for years and never come across this. How did you
> determine?
>
> If a bug, please report it to them.
Thank you Apesbrain for your reply.
I used metaflac --list to display metadata. I saw that all files created
by Audacity had no block of type
reinholdk wrote:
> After a full library scan please check the scanner.log file for error
> messages. Look at the WebUI->Settings->Information page for the file
> location.
Thank you reinholdk for your advice. Here is the scanner log file :
25220
There are some warnings about playlists but I
delisle wrote:
> When comparing this track with the (not displayed) other tracks using
> metaflac I discovered that Audacity had not created a seek table in the
> files it created.
Have used Audacity for years and never come across this. How did you
determine?
If a bug, please report it to
After a full library scan please check the scanner.log file for error
messages. Look at the WebUI->Settings->Information page for the file
location.
reinholdk's Profile:
18 matches
Mail list logo
