mherger wrote:
>
> check out the "status" query.
>
Thanks you, will do.
Is there anything in the syntax of the 'jivefavorite add' command that
links that preset to a position in the list? When I do a long press on
button 4 on the Boom, the preset gets inserted into the 4th row of the
list
C'mon!... now that I've started to look into the RandomPlay bottlenecks
with a 100k "collection" :-). There definitely is some unnecessary
overhead. But I'm not sure this could be turned into one snappy action
without re-implementing a lot of the performance critical code.
That said: starting
mherger wrote:
> > C'mon!... now that I've started to look into the RandomPlay
> bottlenecks
> > with a 100k "collection" :-). There definitely is some unnecessary
> > overhead. But I'm not sure this could be turned into one snappy action
>
> > without re-implementing a lot of the performance
slartibartfast wrote:
> Starting a random mix on a Pi 3 with around 47000 tracks takes long
> enough to stop playback for about 20 seconds while playing a 320k radio
> station. Playback continues for 10 seconds after triggering the song mix
> before stopping so 30 seconds in total before the mix
mherger wrote:
> > C'mon!... now that I've started to look into the RandomPlay
> bottlenecks
> > with a 100k "collection" :-). There definitely is some unnecessary
> > overhead. But I'm not sure this could be turned into one snappy action
>
> > without re-implementing a lot of the performance
Try SET1=["button","preset_5.hold"] to save preset 5 from sbpd.
Also, here's the server request that jive sends to save preset 5 while
playing a track.
Code:
DEBUG net.comet - Comet.lua:361 Sending pending request(s):
{ --[[table: 0xb659ea58]]
{ --[[table:
mherger wrote:
> > performance set to normal though.
>
> Unless you're running a lot of other software on that unit, try high at
> least. I'm using max on my pCP (server/jivelite only, no playback).
>
> --
>
> MichaelSet to normal random mix takes 30 seconds and set to high it takes 28
Thanks - so is that the 'jivefavorite' command that Michael mentioned?
Yes.
So I'm assuming that Jive knows which function key was pressed to call
that command, but it's not clear to me how the preset information ends
up in the right line of the presets section in server.prefs. If that's
all
Thanks both - that 'preset_5.hold' option looks promising, if it that's
what is called when function button 5 is held. It would be nice to
avoid having to get too deeply into CLI and Jive scripting :)
chill's Profile:
Thanks - so is that the 'jivefavorite' command that Michael mentioned?
So I'm assuming that Jive knows which function key was pressed to call
that command, but it's not clear to me how the preset information ends
up in the right line of the presets section in server.prefs. If that's
all handled
performance set to normal though.
Unless you're running a lot of other software on that unit, try high at
least. I'm using max on my pCP (server/jivelite only, no playback).
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
slartibartfast wrote:
> Set to normal random mix takes 30 seconds and set to high it takes 28
> seconds. Not much difference.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Did you already give us specifics on number of Genre and quality of
Tagging? The post I read from Michael said that disk space
Any updates for a fix on this? One of the best plugins it would be great
if we could access again. Love to start streaming some Dead through the
big system .
Squeezebox Touch
Audio gear: Fisher 500C/Fisher X101-B/Garrard Lab 80/AR XA/Dual 1019/
Klipsch Cornwall II/AR 2ax/Sony
Hmm - preset_5.hold doesn't seem to do anything. I can see the command
being triggered by the button press (in the console output of sbpd), but
whatever it's doing, it's not updating the list of presets (or the list
of favourites).
iPhone wrote:
> Did you already give us specifics on number of Genre and quality of
> Tagging? The post I read from Michael said that disk space is used for
> the actual list, do you have a drive available for your RPi to compile
> the list on or is it forced to use the remaining system RAM? If
chill wrote:
> The preset_5.hold button is an IR command I believe, so I tried it on a
> Boom using the remote control. Pressing and holding the number 5 key on
> the remote brings up the message "Preset #5 (hold to save)", but no
> matter how long I hold it, the current track doesn't get
.
This is probably going to be a Michael question:
Changes to LMS that Blocks DDNS Remote Access to ones Local Settings
Page is impacting how certain users use LMS and Squeezebox remotely. Is
there a means possible to place this Blocking feature in LMS "Settings"
with a default setting of ON so
The preset_5.hold button is an IR command I believe, so I tried it on a
Boom using the remote control. Pressing and holding the number 5 key on
the remote brings up the message "Preset #5 (hold to save)", but no
matter how long I hold it, the current track doesn't get inserted as a
preset. If I
svberger wrote:
> Any updates for a fix on this? One of the best plugins it would be great
> if we could access again. Love to start streaming some Dead through the
> big system .
.
Live Shows were always better then studio albums when it comes to the
Grateful Dead and of course 90% of the best
Given that my NAS is a lot stronger than a RPI3 this is strange. With no
active playback the server becomes unreachable for more than 5 minutes.
This is with the performance set to maximum.
I do have some tweaks in place which might help both cases. It's very
well possible that the effort
Is there anything in the syntax of the 'jivefavorite add' command tha > links
that preset to a position in the list? When I do a long press on
button 4 on the Boom, the preset gets inserted into the 4th row of the
list of presets. How does the 'jivefavorite add' command know which row
to place
Would you guys be willing and able to replace a file or two to test some
changes? I think I have something which could improve your situation.
I'm not saying it will resolve all performance issues with RandomPlay,
but improve the situation :-). I have to measure it on my MacBook to see
the
mherger wrote:
> Would you guys be willing and able to replace a file or two to test some
>
> changes? I think I have something which could improve your situation.
> I'm not saying it will resolve all performance issues with RandomPlay,
> but improve the situation :-). I have to measure it on
mherger wrote:
> Would you guys be willing and able to replace a file or two to test some
>
> changes? I think I have something which could improve your situation.
> I'm not saying it will resolve all performance issues with RandomPlay,
> but improve the situation :-). I have to measure it on
Jive supports holding the Function keys F1 - F6 to set the corresponding
preset.
Ralphy
*1*-Touch, *5*-Classics, *3*-Booms, *1*-UE Radio
'Squeezebox client builds'
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmsclients/files/) 'donations'
tr0ner wrote:
> I do have tags they are just not very consistent: for example I have:
> Beatles
> beatles
> the Beatles
> The beatles
>
> All with different tags like Rock, Classic Rock, Oldie and so on =)
>
> For now the results of your plugin seem to be very good!
You should consider buying
Changes to LMS that Blocks DDNS Remote Access to ones Local Settings
Page is impacting how certain users use LMS and Squeezebox remotely.
That's correct and expected.
Anybody have ideas of local user workaround? Is this Possible, Thoughts,
Ideas?
Use a VPN or SSH tunnelling. Just don't
I'll go grab a spare Pi and let it deal with my 100k collection :-).
Can't guarantee this is representative for your situation. But on that
Pi2 the latest changes sped up the creation of the list by about 500%.
The overhead was _not_ in disk I/O, but unnecessary overhead like
sorting results
Enable debug logging for player.ir, control.command and see whether you
can get some more information in server.log.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
29 matches
Mail list logo
