Hi Amos
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Does ICAP really not build without a const version of the operator[]?
Strangly it does for me. Oh well, adding anyway.
May be because of different versions of g++. I am using g++ 4.1.2 here .
This change is more of a problem. To me it looks like the latter
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 02:38 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Oh dear I was sure y test build had --enable-icap.
Seems not though, very sorry.
Blame evil #ifdefs!
I was going to, then I looked at the code more.
I can't see _any_ in that file file.
I'm using the same g++
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 02:38 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Oh dear I was sure y test build had --enable-icap.
Seems not though, very sorry.
Blame evil #ifdefs!
Index: ICAP/ICAPXaction.cc
===
RCS file:
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 03:33 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 02:38 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Oh dear I was sure y test build had --enable-icap.
Seems not though, very sorry.
Blame evil #ifdefs!
I was going to, then I looked at the code
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've mostly copied over the older buffering thats in squid-2.6 and squid-3
logfile.c(c). Please review and provide feedback.
I'm not going to try and improve the logfile writing in LogFileBlocking;
I just want it to mimic what the current codebase
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've mostly copied over the older buffering thats in squid-2.6 and squid-3
logfile.c(c). Please review and provide feedback.
I'm not going to try and improve the logfile writing in LogFileBlocking;
I just want it to mimic what the
