On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 02:42 +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Wouldn't a runtime check be enough to activate on of the two comm
> loops? I've seen it done in other apps.
Quite some restructuring will be needed for that to happen. Adding
libevent is a lot easier and fits nicely within the existing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 21/lug/06, alle ore 23:31, Henrik Nordstrom ha scritto:
tis 2006-07-11 klockan 14:34 +0200 skrev Luigi Gangitano:
During discussions on the debian-devel mailing list, it was proposed
to enable a fallback if epoll() is not available at sta
tis 2006-07-11 klockan 14:34 +0200 skrev Luigi Gangitano:
> I've just packaged squid-2.6.STABLE1 and squid-3.0.PRE4 for debian,
> enabling epoll() support at build time.
>
> This obviously makes squid fail with kernels older than 2.6.x which
> are still supported by debian.
>
> During discus
Hi all,
I've just packaged squid-2.6.STABLE1 and squid-3.0.PRE4 for debian,
enabling epoll() support at build time.
This obviously makes squid fail with kernels older than 2.6.x which
are still supported by debian.
During discussions on the debian-devel mailing list, it was proposed
to e
