Adrian: What was the exact number of filedescriptors you configured
Squid for using?
I am a bit reluctant about doing this change in Squid-2.5 as to me
this large (but non-intrusive) change does not seem to be needed if
the FD_SETSIZE override is fixed to ensure the new size gets rounded
up
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 21:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hiya,
I'd like to remove the fd_set stuff from delay pools.
My first hack was to turn the fd_set's into arrays.
That looked fine. :-)
Do people have an issue with this? The downside is the
byte-per-fd wasted but considering how much RAM
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 22:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
What do people think?
I'm working on a more generic solution at the moment, consolidating
deferred reads and delay pools etc..
Rough notes in bugzilla, or pop onto IRC and we can
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Sure. I'm pushing the arch mirror now. It's in the epoll branch
([EMAIL PROTECTED]/squid--epoll--3.0).
[snip]
It sounds good. Now, what about squid-2.5? :)
Adrian
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 23:06, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Sure. I'm pushing the arch mirror now. It's in the epoll branch
([EMAIL PROTECTED]/squid--epoll--3.0).
[snip]
It sounds good. Now, what about squid-2.5? :)
2.5? whassat?
Rob
--
GPG key
