[squid-users] Bug 2973 - Memory leak when handling pathless http requests

2010-07-02 Thread Richard Wall
I just filed a new bug and wondered if anyone here had seen a similar problem or had any suggestions about how to track down the possible memory leak. * http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2973 There seems to be quite a bad memory leak in the way Squid handles HTTP requests which do not

Re: [squid-users] how to cache youtube

2010-04-09 Thread Richard Wall
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Kinkie gkin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:32 AM, sameer khan khanza...@hotmail.com wrote: Please see http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube thanks kinkie, but does it work ? any one experience with below link ? will be

[squid-users] TProxy for Squid-2.7.STABLE8

2010-02-23 Thread Richard Wall
Hi Henrik, Amos, etc I've been trying to compile Squid-2.7.STABLE8 (squid-2.HEAD-20100222) but am having difficulty applying the Visolve TProxy-4 patch * http://www.visolve.com/squid/squid-tproxy.php The patch no longer applies cleanly. I spent some time trying to resolve the conflicts, and

Re: [squid-users] Configure a transparent proxy to pass through non-http port 80 traffic [Was: How to handle the error: Unsupported method 'BitTorrent']

2010-01-12 Thread Richard Wall
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: I would not worry about that. P2P apps which use port 80 usually have other methods of connecting. Particularly their own dedicated protocol ports. Leave those open and they work better. The apps which do not use port

[squid-users] Configure a transparent proxy to pass through non-http port 80 traffic [Was: How to handle the error: Unsupported method 'BitTorrent']

2010-01-05 Thread Richard Wall
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Khemara Lyn wrote: How can I handle this error in Cache log: parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method 'BitTorrent' Is it serious or does it affect Squid performance? It's only a waste of TCP connections, if you have

Re: [squid-users] Issue with multiple Squids / TPROXY / WCCP and DNS load balancing

2009-08-14 Thread Richard Wall
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomasuh...@fantomas.sk wrote: snip Squid ignores the original destination of connection in order to provide correct content. Many servers provide the same (their own) content independently on what Host: you ask for, so the cache would get filled

[squid-users] Issue with multiple Squids / TPROXY / WCCP and DNS load balancing

2009-08-12 Thread Richard Wall
Hello, I'm seeing exactly the same problem as was described in this email (in 2004): * http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200407/0008.html The http client does a DNS lookup, then Squid repeats the DNS lookup and receives a different host IP - which means that Squid makes it's

Re: [squid-users] WCCP+Squid not working. Could use some of your experience.

2009-01-24 Thread Richard Wall
supported on Linux, but I'm not sure about FreeBSD (see http://cacheboy.blogspot.com/2009/01/freebsd-tproxy-works.html) Hope that helps. -RichardW. -- Richard Wall ApplianSys Ltd http://www.appliansys.com

Re: [squid-users] WCCP load balancing and TPROXY fully transparent interception

2008-12-19 Thread Richard Wall
hadn't implemented this feature yet. (See http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200811/0130.html) Thanks for the links. -RichardW. -- Richard Wall Support Engineer ApplianSys Ltd http://www.appliansys.com (t) +44 (0)24 7643 0094 (f) +44 (0)87 0762 7063 (e) richard.w...@appliansys.com

[squid-users] WCCP v2 connection dropped intermittently: HERE_I_AM not received by router

2008-12-19 Thread Richard Wall
new assignment }}} -- Richard Wall ApplianSys Ltd http://www.appliansys.com

Re: [squid-users] WCCP load balancing and TPROXY fully transparent interception

2008-12-18 Thread Richard Wall
the redirected traffic in such a way that it is passed through directly instead? Look forward to any information you can provide. -RichardW. -- Richard Wall ApplianSys Ltd http://www.appliansys.com

Re: [squid-users] Update Accelerator, Squid and Windows Update Caching

2008-10-16 Thread Richard Wall
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Wall wrote: Hi, I've been reading through the archive looking for information about squid 2.6 and windows update caching. The FAQ mentions problems with range offsets but it's not really clear which versions

[squid-users] Update Accelerator, Squid and Windows Update Caching

2008-10-10 Thread Richard Wall
Hi, I've been reading through the archive looking for information about squid 2.6 and windows update caching. The FAQ mentions problems with range offsets but it's not really clear which versions of Squid this applies to. I'm going to experiment, but if anyone has any positive or negative

Re: [squid-users] Update Accelerator, Squid and Windows Update Caching

2008-10-10 Thread Richard Wall
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Wall wrote: I've been reading through the archive looking for information about squid 2.6 and windows update caching. The FAQ mentions problems with range offsets but it's not really clear which versions of Squid

[squid-users] Job Opportunity: Squid support engineer at ApplianSys, UK

2008-06-12 Thread Richard Wall
like to hear from you. -RichardW. -- Richard Wall Support Engineer ApplianSys Ltd http://www.appliansys.com (t) +44 (0)24 7643 0094 (f) +44 (0)87 0762 7063 (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] RAID is good

2008-03-27 Thread Richard Wall
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Marcus Kool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Only one cache directory per disk is recommended while you have 4 cache directories on one file system. Consider dropping 2 COSS cache directories so that you have 1 COSS and 1 AUFS. Yep, I understand. Unfortunately

Re: [squid-users] RAID is good (was: Re: [squid-users] Hardware setup ?)

2008-03-26 Thread Richard Wall
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Marcus Kool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish that the wiki for RIAD is rewritten. Companies depend on internet access and a working Squid proxy and therefore the advocated no problem if a single disk fails is not from today's reality. One should also

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-19 Thread Richard Wall
On 2/18/08, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats basically right - Squid doesn't handle the NTLM itself, it just passes the blob right through. The helper framework can handle hundreds of requests a second without too much thought; I'd like to spend some time figuring out what Samba

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-19 Thread Richard Wall
On 2/19/08, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day, THanks for this stuff. Could you possibly try hitting it hard enough to cause Squid to back up on pending authentications? It'd be good to replicate a fail situation; we can then take that to the samba guys and ask wtf? Adrian,

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-19 Thread Richard Wall
On 2/19/08, Guido Serassio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 14:40 19/02/2008, Richard Wall wrote: First problem is that you have to reinterpret the Squid reported hit ratios when using NTLM auth. Only half of these are hits, the other half being TCP_DENIED/407 that form part of the NTLM auth

[squid-users] Squid automatically builds the COSS storage file

2008-02-18 Thread Richard Wall
Hi, My first post to squid-users, so first let me thank the developers for their work on Squid. I'm working with 2.6.STABLE17 and am experimenting with COSS storage. According to the COSS Faq page, you have to create the COSS storage file (using dd) before pointing Squid to it: *

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-18 Thread Richard Wall
Hi Adrian, My comments are below. On 2/18/08, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got one customer who is asking for some testing of Squid in a large NTLM environment. The problem, as those who have tried it will have encountered, is that although Squid can keep up with it, the

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-18 Thread Richard Wall
On 2/18/08, Richard Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: googling suggests that curl may be able to send NTLM Proxy auth requests. Sorry forgot to include the link: * http://curl.haxx.se/docs/manpage.html#--proxy-ntlm -RichardW.

Re: [squid-users] NTLM authentication testing

2008-02-18 Thread Richard Wall
On 2/18/08, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'll be stuffed: violet:~ adrian$ curl --help | grep ntlm --ntlm Enable HTTP NTLM authentication (H) --proxy-ntlmEnable NTLM authentication on the proxy (H) I wonder how well it'll work. Oh well, time to have a