Re: Re: Re: [squid-users] adaptation_access and rep_mime_type -- It doesn't seem to work

2011-04-30 Thread Trever L. Adams
On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > And these are tested for RESPMOD services right? > > I was suspecting you hit the bug about RESPMOD not being passed the > request details correctly. The SoftwareUpdateAgent and > SoftwareUpdateDomain would always be failed-match with that bug and >

Re: Re: [squid-users] adaptation_access and rep_mime_type -- It doesn't seem to work

2011-04-17 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:17:29 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote: On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 15/04/11 20:46, Trever L. Adams wrote: I am using squid 3.1.10. I have a virus scanner and a content classifier (to build content filter with Squid ACLs). The virus scanner has several

Re: Re: [squid-users] adaptation_access and rep_mime_type -- It doesn't seem to work

2011-04-17 Thread Trever L. Adams
On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 15/04/11 20:46, Trever L. Adams wrote: >> I am using squid 3.1.10. I have a virus scanner and a content classifier >> (to build content filter with Squid ACLs). The virus scanner has several >> modes. One scans transparently and passes on data in