Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2012-07-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/07/2012 7:38 p.m., a bv wrote: Impossible keep-alive header http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/detect_broken_pconn/ The server has sent a header telling Squid to keep-alive the connection, but then has sent an unknown-length response that requires a connection close. Amos

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-23 Thread M J
] Subject: RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:48:29 +0100 (CET) On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Mike Mitchell wrote: I've just installed the squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040119 snapshot and now I'm flooded with Impossible keep-alive header messages. I have a parent proxy of a Trend

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-23 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, M J wrote: I had the same problem using the following snapshot squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040123.tar.bz2. Henrik wasn4t the keep-alive.patch incorporeted in to the daily snapshot ? Many thanks in advance, Leon. All the changes discussed are in the current snapshot. Please

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-23 Thread M J
Sorry Henrik, I use one old topic that had the same problem / configuration as I do, but I now a realize that there is a lot of them, I m sorry. I ll give details. I was having a problem that the file cache.log was full of these warnings 2004/01/23 19:38:38| ctx: exit level 0 2004/01/23

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Mitchell
: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:51 PM To: Steve Snyder; Alex Sharaz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Thinking... OK, I think I know what the bug is in that patch. Confirmed. The logics on what keep-alive

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Mike Mitchell wrote: I've just installed the squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040119 snapshot and now I'm flooded with Impossible keep-alive header messages. I have a parent proxy of a Trend Micro Interscan Viruswall version 3.8 running on the same machine. Here's an example from

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Mike Mitchell wrote: I've just installed the squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040119 snapshot and now I'm flooded with Impossible keep-alive header messages. I have a parent proxy of a Trend Micro Interscan Viruswall version 3.8 running on the same machine. Here's an example from

RE: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, M J wrote: Hi Henrik, many thanks for your patch. Now using squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040119.tar.bz2 with your keep-alive.patch and no more Impossible keep-alive header messages. Many thanks for your replay!! ;) Tomorrow this patch will be incorporated in to daily snapshot ?

Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-14 Thread Alex Sharaz
Yup just downloaded the latest 2.5S4 snapshot and installed it on one of my caches and they started. All the other caches are o.k. alex --On 14 January 2004 10:37 -0500 Steve Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm suddenly getting a lot of these errors. Here's an example: 2004/01/14 10:29:35|

Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Steve Snyder wrote: I'm suddenly getting a lot of these errors. Here's an example: 2004/01/14 10:29:35| ctx: exit level 0 2004/01/14 10:29:35| ctx: enter level 0: 'http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/' 2004/01/14 10:29:35| httpProcessReplyHeader:

Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Thinking... OK, I think I know what the bug is in that patch. What does access.log say? Regards Henrik On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Alex Sharaz wrote: Yup just downloaded the latest 2.5S4 snapshot and installed it on one of my caches and they started. All the other caches are o.k. alex --On 14

Re: [squid-users] Impossible keep-alive header

2004-01-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Thinking... OK, I think I know what the bug is in that patch. Confirmed. The logics on what keep-alive headers are impossible was a little too broad, sometimes triggering on fully valid HTTP/1.0 replies. The patch has been corrected, and attached