Hello Paul,
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Paul Lankow wrote...
>> Sounds to me like you're being bitten by that uw-imap
>> misconfiguration where it scans your entire home directory.. You
>> may want to doublecheck that.
> Thanks for the tip! I searched Google and went though the on docs at
> the Uof
> Sounds to me like you're being bitten by that uw-imap misconfiguration
> where it scans your entire home directory.. You may want to doublecheck
> that.
Thanks for the tip! I searched Google and went though the on docs at the
UofW and couldn't find a reference to this "feature". Can you give me
Wow, this is fantastic!
I downloaded 1.4.1 CVS and the performance is now very good.
With 1.4.0 I had to wait 30 seconds to see my mailbox, now it is only 1-2
seconds! However, I have not installed any plug-ins yet, so I don't know
if it has anything to do with that. I will report back once I have.
> Going from one message to another in a mail box (none have more than 50)
> takes 10 seconds. Freshing the folder list takes about 20. I have about
> 100 folders, including sub folders, but only subscribe to 25 on the top
> level. The more I subscribe to the slower it gets.
Sounds to me like you'
Hello Marc,
> 1: Did you use SquirrelMail 1.2.x before and how did that perform?
If there was a speed difference, it wasn't significant.
> 2: Did you enabled server side sorting?
Nope. I found an old IMAP server gave me better performance, so I'm using
imap-4.1.final-1 instead of the RH 8 stock
A few questions:
1: Did you use SquirrelMail 1.2.x before and how did that perform?
2: Did you enabled server side sorting?
3: What parts are slow?
4: How many messages does your INBOX contain?
Marc.
Paul Lankow zei:
>
>> Use SquirrelMail 1.4.1 CVS.
>
> The upgrade from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1 didn't hel
> Use SquirrelMail 1.4.1 CVS.
The upgrade from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1 didn't help (or hurt) my performance
issue. Message highlighting suddenly started working, though. Right now,
I'm running on a Pentium 132 with 128MB of RAM, RedHat 8 stock utilities.
A 1.1Ghz machine is queued up, just not installed y
Use SquirrelMail 1.4.1 CVS.
There were a lot of performance related fixes. Performance issues should
be history :) It could be possible that it's quicker then the 1.2.x
branche. At least that was the intention.
If you tried it and compared the versions and can confirm the performance
did in fact
Hi!I've installed and am running Squirrelmail successfully on my
RedHat 7.2 box. However, it is terribly slow compared to anything else I
have on the box. I've gone through the FAQ and tried some of the tips,
such as installing the PHP accellerator and the IMAP proxy, but it doesn't
help a lot. I'v
