Hi List
I noticed, that one of our CPE copies the Proxy-Authorization HF in
almost all messages sent.
As PRACK were not authenticated, those headers were potentially sent on
to the destination disclosing the authentication username and realm.
So assuming, if credentials are present, the client
Hi Sir/Madam,
I'm trying to set up the presence service according to the manual
http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k31-made-simple
Also refer to the doc
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/xcap_server.html
Seems the Kamailio cfg fine. but when to get the xcap data, get the
Hi Henning
> The issue probably was that the module logs an error if there are no
> credentials in the message.
Thank you for confirming my observation.
It's weird that only 'PRACK' are skipped as causing an error if there
are no credentials probably happens to every messages I guess, if you
Hello,
Maybe the PRACK is not a new request, but an in-dialog request and therefore is
not handled from the code quoted below.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
-Original Message-
From: sr-users On Behalf Of
Hello,
this was actually changed some years ago to be like this:
commit 2a77ed2bdc9341ecf7d7200e420a1f49e4e9b6ab
Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Date: Sun Apr 14 10:11:29 2013 +0200
auth: skip processing of PRACK in consume_credentials()
The issue probably was that the module logs an
Hi Henning
> Maybe the PRACK is not a new request, but an in-dialog request and therefore
> is not handled from the code quoted below.
It is handled:
if(!is_method("REGISTER|PUBLISH")) {
consume_credentials();
xlog("L_INFO",
Hi,
Is there a means of appending new branches from config script for a transaction
which is already proceeding in the background, without using `tsilo`?
That is to say, I have an async transaction which is resumed in an async worker
and is t_relay()’d away to some destination. Meanwhile, I
OpenSIPS seems to have captured well the spirit of this functionality, BTW:
https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/tm.html#t_inject_branches
— Alex
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires
> that I
And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires that
I launder my contacts through a registrar ‘domain’.
Is there any way to go around this requirement? It seems awfully silly to set
up a stub/shadow registrar when I am not a registrar.
— Alex
> On Oct 31, 2022, at
