There is no other more user friendly procedure for the 200ok/ACK SDP
negotiation.
The existence of SDP in the initial INVITE must be checked.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Ovidiu Sas :
>> Why?
>> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 20
2010/9/21 Ovidiu Sas :
> Why?
> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
> flag was deprecated);
Hi, in case of "200/ACK SDP" rtpproxy_offer should be called in the
183/200 and rtpproxy_answer in the ACK, and for that the existance of
a SDP body should be inspected in th
On 9/22/10 12:55 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/9/21 dotnetdub:
This substitution works fine but when I read $pU it still has the leading 0
Yes, the change is just applied when the message leaves the proxy.
... and if one needs the change to be visible in the config before
sending to net
2010/9/21 dotnetdub :
> This substitution works fine but when I read $pU it still has the leading 0
Yes, the change is just applied when the message leaves the proxy.
> What is the best way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
I recommedn you to first delete the PPI header with
hf_remove("P-Prefer
On 9/22/10 12:49 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 09/21/2010 04:47 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
I also looked at using re.subst on $pU but can't get it to work.
What is the best way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
I would extract a substring based on length. Intermediate (first)
variable 'pu_len' i
On 09/21/2010 04:47 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
I also looked at using re.subst on $pU but can't get it to work.
What is the best way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
I would extract a substring based on length. Intermediate (first)
variable 'pu_len' is required because transformations cannot be
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> sipscenario is pretty good for usage in command line, then use a browser. It
> is very customizable, but you need to check the sources for parameters, it
> is a perl script:
>
> http://www.iptel.org/~sipsc/
Thanks, I used it some time ago to rende
I have a feeling that maybe what CDRTool does is run data through
ASCII SIP scenario generator and then just replace certain artifacts
of its output, like ASCII art arrows, etc., into arrow images, and
also split up the output into tabular form. I haven't looked at the
code (não falamos Py
Hello,
sipscenario is pretty good for usage in command line, then use a
browser. It is very customizable, but you need to check the sources for
parameters, it is a perl script:
http://www.iptel.org/~sipsc/
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 9:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to crea
Hi All
I am receiving a Preferred-Identity from a customer which I need to modify
(strip the first character a 0) and then send it as Remote Party ID
Sending the RPID is no problem, my issue is stripping the character.
I have tried a few things to do this.
subst('/^P-Preferred-Identity:(.*)(.*)
2010/9/21 Alex Balashov :
> Whatever method CDRTool uses to draw them from 'siptrace' data is quite
> good. But I am not sure if it is its own or if it's a library/package of
> some kind.
Yes, that could inspire me. I will take a look to it.
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
Whatever method CDRTool uses to draw them from 'siptrace' data is quite
good. But I am not sure if it is its own or if it's a library/package
of some kind.
On 09/21/2010 03:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to create cool SIP flows to be displayed in a HTML.
What I'm looking fo
Hi, I'm trying to create cool SIP flows to be displayed in a HTML.
What I'm looking for is something like (or exactly) this:
http://www.tech-invite.com/Ti-sip-dialog.html
There you can click into messages to show the complete headers/body
and so on. Does somebody know a tool to create such flow
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> >ERROR: reply too big
> >
> > how to get rid of that?
> this seems to come from sercmd tool. Quickly grepping its sources, the
> internal limit is 4K for rpc replies. You can try to recompile sercmd
> after setting bigger value for MAX_*_SIZE defines.
ok.
Long time ago I did a brief description on how bridging can be
achieved. It was for openser but it is still valid:
http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@openser.org/msg04806.html
Probably we should add this to the rtpproxy module documentation.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM, D
Hello,
On 9/21/10 6:43 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
you can increase the buffer size via mod param:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/ctl.html#binrpc_max_body_size
daniel,
after increasing binrpc_struct_max_body_size to 30:
modparam("ctl", "binrpc
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> you can increase the buffer size via mod param:
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/ctl.html#binrpc_max_body_size
daniel,
after increasing binrpc_struct_max_body_size to 30:
modparam("ctl", "binrpc_max_body_size", 30)
error message:
error: 50
On 9/21/10 6:23 PM, César Pinto Magán wrote:
I mean for a more detailed functionality and capabilities.
ok, understand. Probably we should open a wiki page for it. There are
one or two configs (perhaps pretty old now) in nathelper module to show
bridging mode.
Cheers,
Daniel
The bridge
will be fixed soon, meanwhile, the raw-from-git generation of all
docbooks is available at:
http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/
Thanks,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 6:25 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
The kamailio doc website doesn't have the new rtpproxy module documentation:
http://www.kama
The kamailio doc website doesn't have the new rtpproxy module documentation:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/
Also, ratelimit module is listed as being k and in fact it is generic now.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Ka
I mean for a more detailed functionality and capabilities. The bridge mode
appears in http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/SER+example+outboundproxy and it
is talked about in this list (I had to search deep int the list records to find
some about). It is supposed to be used in a multihomed site, b
Hi Cesar,
are you looking for rtpproxy protocol format or for a more detailed
functionality of rtpproxy capabilities (e.g., what means bridge mode)?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 5:52 PM, César Pinto Magán wrote:
Hello,
I'm actually using rtpproxy_offer/answer(), and it works fine for us. I ha
Hello,
I'm actually using rtpproxy_offer/answer(), and it works fine for us. I had to
move from force_rtp_rpoxy() because it had several rare behaviors and the use
of the offer/answer model solved them. It is very simple to implement.
By the way, is there any type of documentation about rtpproxy
On 9/21/10 5:42 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
force_rtp_proxy does not handle properly 200ok/ACK renegotiation (the
s flag is obsolete).
I am using offer/answer (the new rtpproxy module) in bridging mode
without any issues.
Migrating from force_rtp_proxy to offer/answer model is quite straight forward.
force_rtp_proxy does not handle properly 200ok/ACK renegotiation (the
s flag is obsolete).
I am using offer/answer (the new rtpproxy module) in bridging mode
without any issues.
Migrating from force_rtp_proxy to offer/answer model is quite straight forward.
Maintaing both force rtp and ofer/answer
On 09/21/2010 11:27 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
personally I haven't tested much those functions. Maybe is better for
now to mark it obsolete and add a warning message at startup (via
fixup), then remove it with next release, allowing some maturity tests
for new ones. I am saying that al
Hello,
On 9/21/10 5:12 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was
On 09/21/2010 11:23 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 09/21/2010 11:12 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support
On 09/21/2010 11:12 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was depre
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was deprecated);
- all functionality of force_rtp_pro
On 09/21/2010 05:41 PM, Santiago Soares wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
Here are the config file and the memory status right now.
I didn't change the memory pool.
I don't know how to interpret the memory log. Can you help me?
Hello
Yes sure. But you still haven't answer my question. Is it priva
Hi Daniel,
Here goes the log with debug=4:
Sep 20 16:19:56 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16384]:
DBG:sanity:sanity_check: all sanity checks passed
Sep 20 16:19:56 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16382]:
DBG:core:get_hdr_field: [44]; uri=[sip:myu...@test.com]
Sep 20 16:19
Hello,
is it compile with memory debug on? The status shows it is still fast
malloc.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 4:41 PM, Santiago Soares wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
Here are the config file and the memory status right now.
I didn't change the memory pool.
I don't know how to interpret the
Thanks for the answers.
Here are the config file and the memory status right now.
I didn't change the memory pool.
I don't know how to interpret the memory log. Can you help me?
Config file
# --- global configuration parameters
# vim:bg=dark
check_via=no #
For a shorter version of memory status you can set memory_summary=2 or 3:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.0.x#mem_summary
This will show quickly if there is a leak.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 9:57 AM, marius zbihlei wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:18 AM, Marius Zbihlei wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:18 AM, Marius Zbihlei wrote:
Hello
Can you give us more information on the modules you are loading/ your specific
config ?
Marius
Also, is it shared memory or private memory? If you have a dump of the
memory distribution, can you spot anything out of the ordinary. As a
36 matches
Mail list logo
