Hello,
On 2/20/13 7:44 PM, Camila Troncoso wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working for a while with Kamailio+Freeswitch as SBC.
I have this structure:
**
When I make a call from one client connected to LCR, it is route to
my SBC and afterwards to his destiny in the cloud passing though a
gateway.
Hello,
On 2/19/13 11:41 PM, Mino Haluz wrote:
Thank you very much for this.
One question regarding $sht. Does it need locking like $shv does?
depends what operation you do. A read does not need locking, a write
does not need, but updates that uses itself need.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Thu, Feb
My curiosity now, what means the syslog message:
... t of memory [6720]
I guess the last is pid. Is it like just last part of OUt of memory?
Never had this message so far, iirc.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 2/19/13 11:58 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
On 02/19/2013 11:26 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
On
Can I increase the shared memory when kamailio is still running or configure it
somewhere in a configuration file to use x amount of shared memory? The
kamailio process is managed by heartbeat/pacemaker as a resource and I was
advised not to manually restart a resource which is managed by
Hello,
When I used msg_apply_changes(); in route[RELAY] included in request_route,
Received ERROR: textopsx [textopsx.c:116]: invalid usage - not in request
route.
Why?
Thanks,
Julia.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
Dear All,
I am trying to use Kamailio 3.1.x server (called LB here) as the Load
Balancer for two other Kamailio server (called server01 and server02 here) .
Client A - Kamailio LB - Kamailio server01
Client B - Kamailio LB - Kamailio server01
If I dont use LB here ,
Hi Daniel,
In deed the Ruri is the only difference with the second invite.
For the first Invite, I received an “503 Service unavailable” from the
gateway , it goues trough the SBC and it is pass to the LCR so it reroutes
the call to the second gateway in the cloud.
I asked in FreeSWITCH
Are the clients behind NAT? If yes, you have to use proper NAT traversal
on the LB. Further, for outgoing INVITEs you have to route the requests
through the LB, either by static forwarding to the LB or using the Path
extension.
regards
Klaus
On 21.02.2013 12:36, chanea wrote:
Dear All,
I
Hi,
this last weekend we went live from the old 3.0 version to the latest stable
release of Kamailio (3,3,0). All went well, except for one issue. We make use
of uac_replace_from in our config, in case a client needs CLIR:
uac_replace_from(Anonymous,sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid);
Since
Hi Daniel,
On 02/21/2013 09:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
My curiosity now, what means the syslog message:
... t of memory [6720]
I guess the last is pid. Is it like just last part of OUt of memory?
Never had this message so far, iirc.
What I found through debugging is that this
Dear Klaus,
Thanks for your help. Both the server and clients are behind NAT.
After adding NAT traversal on the LB , now the clients are able to talk to
each other via MESSAGE method.
However, there is another issue that , every time the client A sends one
message to the server , the client
Try to look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803827 and
http://forums.cpanel.net/f34/named-wont-start-284821.html#post1191151
2013/2/21 Andreas Granig agra...@sipwise.com
Hi Daniel,
On 02/21/2013 09:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
My curiosity now, what means the
Hi,
On 02/21/2013 07:50 PM, Konstantin M. wrote:
Try to look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803827 and
http://forums.cpanel.net/f34/named-wont-start-284821.html#post1191151
As noted above, I've found the issue already, which was caused by
setting the lock-mem ulimit (the -l
Responding to myself: attached is an ngrep (made by homer/sipcature server).
Some strange things are happening. When I do a ngrep on the Kamailio, I see the
ACK gets mangled:
SIP UA - Kamalio
ACK sip:08000403@10.254.254.20:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
Hi All,
Given a situation where there are multiple registrars, behind a single load
balancer, sharing the same location table in DB, I understand that Path can
be used to ensure everything works nicely with clients behind NAT. So, if
UA1 is registered on P1, UA2 on P2, and UA1 calls UA2... P1
Hi,
On 06/02/2013 15:16, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013, 13:55:41 schrieb Charles Chance:
as the original author of the module I'd think that changing or replacing
the existing module would be the way to go. So far I'd not recieved that
much of bug reports against the
http://sip-router.org/contribute/
http://sip-router.org/tracker/
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Charles Chance
charles.cha...@sipcentric.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06/02/2013 15:16, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013, 13:55:41 schrieb Charles Chance:
as
Hi,
you cannot use add_path(), but by creating your own Path header this works,
e.g.:
append_hf(Path: sip:term@HOSTNAME:+PORT+;lr\r\n);
(from our P-CSCF config)
Then your Proxy should also evaluate the DNS-SRV records.
Kind regards,
Carsten
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I did try that, but the path is still not stored in location table on save.
I have use_path parameter of registrar module enabled.
On 21 February 2013 23:17, Carsten Bock cars...@ng-voice.com wrote:
Hi,
you cannot use add_path(), but by creating your own Path
Dears,
My name is suhaib mehyar,
I tried to install kamailio server, and I successfully set it up, it is
locally running fine, both audio and video are very good locally but when I
call a client that is connected to the server that is exist after my cisco
firewall with private ip and
If the add the Path header manually, then it is not seen by the
registrar/usrloc module, asthe header will only be added when generating
the to be forwarded message - and this never happens as the message
terminates on the registrar. You could try msg_apply_changes() after
adding the Path
21 matches
Mail list logo
