Re: [SR-Users] Scaling websockets over SIP

mistakenly pressed sent earlier, here is complete query. If we want to use multiple kamailio servers for WebRTC based user agents, what would be the best practice: 1) WS/WSS Outbound/Edge Proxy In this case would it not become a single point of failure? e.g. if we have a wss edge proxy,

[SR-Users] Figuring out why topos stops script from working

Hello, I'm having some trouble with topos not working well when mixed with nathelper (and maybe other cases, too). There is a bug that describes exactly the problem at https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1005 Has anyone else had trouble with this module? Anything I'm missing?

[SR-Users] Scaling websockets over SIP

Hi Guys, I am using kamailio/rtpengine and webrtc over sip client for a/v calls and all works fine. Now I want to scale it to 2 or more than 2 kamailio servers. As per search on mailing list I could: 1) Websocket Outbound/Edge Proxy 2) Each UA client to register with its Regards, Jade SZ

Re: [SR-Users] Topoh module & call leg/transaction does not exist

Hi Olli, same problem here on 4.4.5 Work only without Call-ID hiding. Regards El 28/02/2017 a las 15:47, Olli Attila escribió: Hello, I'm still having this issue and now running the new Kamailio 5.0 branch. The pcap trace is attached to this email which shows the whole sip conversation

Re: [SR-Users] Topoh module & call leg/transaction does not exist

Hello, I'm still having this issue and now running the new Kamailio 5.0 branch. The pcap trace is attached to this email which shows the whole sip conversation before and after topology hiding. Has anyone stumbled upon this kind of "SIP 481 Call leg/Transaction does not exist" error when

Re: [SR-Users] CentOS 6 RPMs don't provide utils.so nor http_client.so

On 28/02/2017 1:54 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: I am building the rpms, but I don't use them (a debian user here), if anyone else wants to jump in to help with the rpm packaging, just reply here, I can grant access to opensuse build system. I've found and fixed it. There is a problem

[SR-Users] Update Kamailio tables

Hi all, What is the quickest way to update Kamailio tables? I wanted to check out the SIPTRACE module and I noticed the table is not there. Thanks. -- Andy Chen ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

[SR-Users] Help with KEEP-ALIVE method

Hi All. Today I have problem with connection from 1 of the clients. Their PBX sends KEEP-ALIVE after some time after REGISTER. I have next error in kamailio log Feb 28 14:26:19 sbc2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3657]: ERROR: [tcp_read.c:1354]: tcp_read_req(): bad request, state=7, error=4

Re: [SR-Users] pushing alarms/counters other than with SNMPstats

Thanks for all the hints. I'll get back, if I encounter problems/questions On 28/02/17 14:45, Valentin Christoph wrote: > Hi all > > > > I’m looking for ways to push stats/alarms from kamailio to some > external destination other than using the SNMPstats module. > > Any ideas? -- Serge S.

Re: [SR-Users] pushing alarms/counters other than with SNMPstats

Hi, StatsD? https://www.kamailio.org/w/tag/statsd/ On 28/02/17 14:45, Valentin Christoph wrote: Hi all I’m looking for ways to push stats/alarms from kamailio to some external destination other than using the SNMPstats module. Any ideas? -- Serge S. Yuriev Lead VoIP engineer

Re: [SR-Users] pushing alarms/counters other than with SNMPstats

Hi, you can also simply query the info through XML-RPC... we do that with Nagios and Check MK. Thanks, Carsten 2017-02-28 12:45 GMT+01:00 Valentin Christoph : > Hi all > > > > I’m looking for ways to push stats/alarms from kamailio to some external > destination

Re: [SR-Users] pushing alarms/counters other than with SNMPstats

We use Munin and Zabbix combined with kamctl as well and works very well. Regards, On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Phil Lavin wrote: > We use Nagios with NRPE to pull stats using kamctl. This pushes them into > Graphite using a Nagios extension called Graphios.

[SR-Users] pushing alarms/counters other than with SNMPstats

Hi all I'm looking for ways to push stats/alarms from kamailio to some external destination other than using the SNMPstats module. Any ideas? Thanks Christoph The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The

Re: [SR-Users] sip over websockets sip uri

Horizontal scaling, that is what I am looking for webrtc over sip. Also by giving 1 SIP URI to webrtc client. Regarding - "Why not do UA -> kamailio 1 -> kamailio 2 or kamailio 3?" Because I want the UA to be configured to wss which can load-balance to multiple kamailio servers. Avoiding single

Re: [SR-Users] CentOS 6 RPMs don't provide utils.so nor http_client.so

Hello, actually utils/http_client should be build, but for whatever reason it is not ... maybe there is an issue in the spec file: - https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:kamailio:v5.0.0-rpms/kamailio50/kamailio.spec?expand=1 I tried to debug and tune a bit for this case, but

Re: [SR-Users] Newbie starting - looking for docs / tutorials

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > Ah, okay - I had thought it would be easier to stick with something I know > and > just replace small bits of it with the unfamiliar Kamailio, adding to my > knowledge one step at a time, but I can see that your suggestion makes

Re: [SR-Users] multi domain kamailio

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:11:28PM +0100, przeqpiciel wrote: > Thanm you for respond. I would like to have a farm of asterisks for one > domain and few single asterisk for dedicated domains. So probably i have to > check destination domain and after that if i found this domain in my DB > then i

Re: [SR-Users] sip over websockets sip uri

Why not do UA -> kamailio 1 -> kamailio 2 or kamailio 3? Not quite sure on what you are trying to achieve. Think of the request uri as the current destined address/hop if no outbound proxy host is specified as otherwise. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:41 AM Jade SZ wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] sip over websockets sip uri

Thanks for the reply. Just to be clear is the above mentioned idea conceptually wrong? so here is a detail of scenario All UA's are over websockets. UA --wss--> HAProxy ws-> (Identical Kamailio Servers - SIP1 and SIP2 for now) ofcourse if a peer is registered on SIP1, SIP2 routes

Re: [SR-Users] sip over websockets sip uri

Perhaps you could configure an outbound proxy in the ws/wss signaling? So it sends traffic to X domain/realm but goes to actual true remote proxy endpoint? On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Jade SZ wrote: > Hi Team, > > Question: > > Just wanted to clarify regarding SIP