Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

2011-07-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Can you try the trunk version? I remember fixing a bug related to the external IP, but I don't remember if it is available on a stable version. Regards, Ovidiu sas On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, MingHon gming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Carsten, I tried RTPProxy using external address. It work

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

2011-07-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
You need to try the git trunk version. The command is available on all versions, but it doesn't work. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:01 PM, MingHon gming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ovidiu, Thanks for the info. But why the command still available in the doc. http://www.kamailio.org

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

2011-07-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Try the latest 3.1. If it doesn't work, install from git. There should be instructions on the kamailio website aout how to do it. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:47 AM, MingHon gming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks.. may i know which version of kamailio? what the different

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

2011-07-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
3.1 was released on Oct 6, 2010 and my commit was on Oct 8, 2010: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=commit;h=0af3944586c881f5d3ea0be19242cdf84906269e You will need to wait for 3.2 or install from trunk. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Ovidiu Sas o

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy[flag, ipaddress] not rewriting c and o ?

2011-07-01 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Are you sure that force_rtp_proxy is invoked? On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:00 PM, MingHon gming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, can anyone here help me out here? i also tried putting it in reply_one. but in the sdp the c= and o= did not change. it stil having the private ip.

Re: [SR-Users] MWI handling

2011-06-30 Thread Ovidiu Sas
and send PUBLISH out. I would stick with asterisk handling the mwi subscription and configure kamailio as a relay only for those events. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Spinov Evgeniy spinov_evge...@intalisan.com wrote: This makes the main problem as in documents I've found

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + rtpproxy behind nat possible?

2011-06-29 Thread Ovidiu Sas
It is possible to use kamailio and rtpproxy behind a NAT. You need to properly craft the config to deal with the fact that kamailio is behind NAT (proper Via, Route, Record-Route headers) and you need to do port forwarding for SIP signalling and rtp. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jun 29, 2011

Re: [SR-Users] MWI handling

2011-06-29 Thread Ovidiu Sas
If you are using asterisk for voicemail, you should let asterisk notify the subscribers about mwi. If you want to use kamailio for notifications, then you need to configure asterisk to send PUBLISH requests to kamailio and kamailio will notify the subscribers. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jun 29

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + rtpproxy behind nat possible?

2011-06-29 Thread Ovidiu Sas
). And also you will need to put proper IPs in SDP (see the rtpproxy module). Start with a simple config, make calls, check all the SIP requests, find out what's not properly set and fix the config. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:08 PM, MingHon gming...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Can you give

Re: [SR-Users] mi_datagram usage example

2011-06-16 Thread Ovidiu Sas
: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=2158069group_id=139143 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086413aid=2166279group_id=232389 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Asgaroth 00asgarot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am trying to send a mi

Re: [SR-Users] mi_datagram usage example

2011-06-16 Thread Ovidiu Sas
IIRC, the feature was requested during openser project (before the merge with sip-router) and it was lost after the merge. You can open a new one on the sip-router tracker. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Bruce McAlister bruce.mcalis...@blueface.ie wrote: Ahh yes, you

Re: [SR-Users] Modifying sip packet

2011-06-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Take a look at the nathelper module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id2592146 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Lucas Alvarez luca...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to modify  the following sip packet, I want to change the SDP IP address

Re: [SR-Users] 302 rewrite ruri based on contact

2011-06-08 Thread Ovidiu Sas
processed). $avp may be transaction persistent (enable it in tm): http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:1.4.x#avps http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.4.x/tm.html#id2530425 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Omar o...@321communications.com wrote: Do i

Re: [SR-Users] 302 rewrite ruri based on contact

2011-05-24 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Here's an example on how to perform forking on failure on 1.4: https://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.4/examples/serial_183.cfg Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Omar o...@321communications.com wrote: I need to rewrite the destination after I receive

Re: [SR-Users] how to add RR with advertised_address in front of normal RR?

2011-05-22 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Andrew, A while ago I commit-ed an enhancement to the rr module to allow setting two rr headers: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules_k/rr.html#id2784744 Please test it and report back any issues. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Pogrebennyk

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Ovidiu Sas
, that was the expected behavior. Not sure if this was fixed. On 13/05/2011, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote: Try the nat_traversal module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/nat_traversal.html It should handle this kind of scenarios. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri

Re: [SR-Users] rewriteuri and append_branch with variables

2011-05-07 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Just set the RURI to the value that you want and then call append_brach(). Everything that's in RURI will be appended as a new branch. After that, reset the RURI to it's original value: revert_uri(). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, alex pappas rebel.pap...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [SR-Users] R: R: R: lcr module: strip and tag

2011-04-27 Thread Ovidiu Sas
LCR tables, of course: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/lcr.html#id2551334 http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/lcr.html#id2499833 http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/lcr.html#id2501638 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Alida

Re: [SR-Users] Looking for SIP consuntant

2011-04-05 Thread Ovidiu Sas
The business mailing list is more appropriate for this kind of requests. Here are some links that might help: http://www.kamailio.org/w/business/ http://www.kamailio.org/w/business-directory/ Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Sabatella, Michael michael.sabate...@ipc.com wrote

Re: [SR-Users] LCR defunct_gw use

2011-03-31 Thread Ovidiu Sas
if it ends up in a failure route, a flag can be set to identify it. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: maybe you can use t_any_timeout? I do not know if it handles internal and external timeout identical http://www.kamailio.org

Re: [SR-Users] Paging from asterisk to accounts with Multiple Registrations...

2011-03-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
-location2 and so on ... Anyway, you can't solve this issue with a single call from asterisk unless you have some rtp-replicator somewhere in the middle to fork the rtp stream from asterisk and let one single rtp stream to go back to asterisk. Regards, Ovidiu Sas

Re: [SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy)

2011-03-09 Thread Ovidiu Sas
to emulate an edge server with a well crafted config. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Derrick Ding dd...@aastra.com wrote: Dear All, I wonder if Kamailio supports RFC5626 as edge proxy or outbound proxy. That is, Edge Proxy adds a Path header with a flow token

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio auth_radius: duplicate User-Name attribute

2011-03-05 Thread Ovidiu Sas
You need to check the dictionaries on your kamailio server. Mos likely something is miss configured there. Check what value do you have for User-Name and see if you have any duplicates for that value. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Kosilov Fedor dangerko...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [SR-Users] About RPM of Kamailio

2011-03-02 Thread Ovidiu Sas
/kamailio.spec.CenOS;h=b2c6d013b2071ac7ec54c15c661b58e7e0d5b005;hb=HEAD Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Suresh Bhandari bring...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Ovidiu, I searched through the kamailio.org/pub but can't find what you said. Can you verify the exact location of package

Re: [SR-Users] stats in kamailio

2011-02-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Each module may or may not have statistics. Check the README file for each module that you have loaded to see what statistics are available. For example, here are the statistics exported by the tmx module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/tmx.html#id2700650 Regards, Ovidiu

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/SIP Router in RHEL 5

2011-02-22 Thread Ovidiu Sas
There is an rpm spec file under ./pkg/kamailio/rpm/kamailio.spec.CenOS. That one should work well under RHEL 5. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Watkins, Bradley bradley.watk...@compuware.com wrote: From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper-module and sdp offer in 200 OK

2011-02-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Add some logs (print the message that you are processing and the rtp command that you are issuing). That should help you in troubleshooting your scenario. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Emil Kroymann emil.kroym...@isaco.de wrote: Hi, yeah, the script does call rtp_offer

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper-module and sdp offer in 200 OK

2011-02-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
from modules_k. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote: But this is how the code it is! Can you provide more details about which version of the code are you using? And which modules? Are you using the kamailio modules or the ser version

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper-module and sdp offer in 200 OK

2011-02-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Emil Kroymann emil.kroym...@isaco.de wrote: Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:23:51 -0500 schrieb Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com: It seems that the s version of nathelper is the one that you are using (I just checked the code and the bug is present

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper-module and sdp offer in 200 OK

2011-02-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Please test the latest trunk version. I removed the rtpproxy functionality from nathelper s version. You can safely use now nathelper from s with rtpproxy from generic. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Emil Kroymann emil.kroym...@isaco.de wrote: Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:23

Re: [SR-Users] Merging nathelper modules

2011-02-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
rtpproxy module was moved to generic rtpproxy functionality from nathelper (s) module was removed Later on, we should merge the nathelper modules into a generic one. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On 1/13/11 7:38

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper-module and sdp offer in 200 OK

2011-02-09 Thread Ovidiu Sas
I will check that and I will get back to you. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Emil Kroymann emil.kroym...@isaco.de wrote: Hi, We recently had a problem with the nathelper module and rtpproxy in a scenario where the SDP offer is sent only in the 200 OK. We use sip

Re: [SR-Users] Reloading a module without restart

2011-02-03 Thread Ovidiu Sas
#qis_it_possible_to_reload_openser_s_configuration_file_with_a_signal Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com wrote: Is it possible to reload a module such as siptrace without requiring a full restart of kamailio.  I have changed my db_url modparam for the siptrace module and would

[SR-Users] Merging nathelper modules

2011-01-13 Thread Ovidiu Sas
) and (k) users: - rtpproxy: a single module for dealing with rtpproxy servers; - nathelper: two variants for dealing with NAT signaling. Next step, will be to merge the two nathelper modules into a single one. Thoughts? Regards, Ovidiu Sas ___ SIP

Re: [SR-Users] Change the SIP-To-User

2011-01-07 Thread Ovidiu Sas
to be manually tweaked (if really necessary). Regards, Ovidiu Sas But there is no similar feature for To header manipulation. regards klaus ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

2010-12-02 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Run top for all processes and also run: vmstat 2 That will give you a global view of your system. As you can see the proxy is not using a lot of cpu. BTW, this is the wrong mailing list as it seems that you are running opensips and not kamailio. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11

Re: [SR-Users] Remove a CODEC in the Invite

2010-11-24 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Try the textops module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/textops.html#id2907488 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Johannes Wagner-Meingassner johannes.wagner-meingass...@infotech.at wrote: Hi all! I have to remove the Transparent Codec in the INVITE

Re: [SR-Users] advertised_address and RR

2010-11-15 Thread Ovidiu Sas
in the record-route-header. record_route_preset and record_route are exclusive - use one or the other but not both for the same message Regards, Ovidiu Sas ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] Crash on processing dialog BYE

2010-10-20 Thread Ovidiu Sas
mediaproxy and qos: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/mediaproxy.html#id3080297 http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/qos.html#id2747034 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote: Not that I know

Re: [SR-Users] Crash on processing dialog BYE

2010-10-20 Thread Ovidiu Sas
That's right. I forgot about that one: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/sst.html#id2968725 Thanks, Ovidiu On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote: On 20.10.2010 16:47, Ovidiu Sas wrote: mediaproxy and qos: http://www.kamailio.org/docs

Re: [SR-Users] rtp proxy - where to invoke?

2010-10-15 Thread Ovidiu Sas
/examples/alg.cfg;hb=ad7f00d840082989132f335914aa0db223a0e46e Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Anders vae...@gmail.com wrote: I've been looking around for documentation to understand rtp proxy with Kamailio better, but with no luck (or I might be quite thick-headed!). Anyone know

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio as IPv6 to IPv4 Gateway

2010-10-15 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Joe, Check out the example provided in the source tree: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob_plain;f=modules_k/rtpproxy/examples/4to6.cfg;hb=ad7f00d840082989132f335914aa0db223a0e46e Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Joe Uelk joe.u

Re: [SR-Users] rtp proxy - where to invoke?

2010-10-15 Thread Ovidiu Sas
that is carrying SDP and rtpproxy_answer for the subsequent reply or ACK request that is carrying SDP. Take a look at the README file: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/rtpproxy.html#id2759708 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Anders vae...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks

Re: [SR-Users] upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1

2010-10-15 Thread Ovidiu Sas
a clean install. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Anders vae...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry about the low-level question, but... - how do I upgrade from Kamailio 3.0 to 3.1? I used git for installing 3.0 (this great guide: http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php

Re: [SR-Users] Record-route issue in Kamailio 3.0.3

2010-10-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Morten Isaksen mi...@misak.dk wrote: Hi, I was mistaken. This is not the problem. OCS kan handle r-r with multiple entry. This one works OK - The OCS sends a PRACK SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP x.x.42.177:65371;rport=65371

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog Module - how???

2010-10-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
) ); Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Nathan Angelacos nan...@nothome.org wrote: Hi Nicolas, On 10/14/10 08:50, Nicolas Rüger wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get dialog module working.. ...my problem is that nothing is stored in the database in table dialog yet. I'm looking

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog Module - how???

2010-10-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
dialog or for requests that are already part of an existing dialog is useless (it's a noop). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Nathan Angelacos nan...@nothome.org wrote: Actually, you want dlg_manage() to be called for every message, not just INVITES  route

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy assistance

2010-10-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
/alg.cfg;hb=HEAD Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com wrote: I'm working on a setup where we have rtpproxy on a machine with eth0 IP 10.10.5.141/19 and eth1 IP 10.10.10.78/24.  When using force_rtp_proxy(,10.10.5.141);  the connection information (c

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy assistance

2010-10-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
They work ok in my setup. The plan is to remove force_rtp_proxy in 3.2. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote: I assume that means rtpproxy_answer|offer actually work now.  :-) Last time there was a conversation about using them

Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy assistance

2010-10-06 Thread Ovidiu Sas
work properly now (as opposed to previous versions 3.1). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote: On 10/06/2010 07:22 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: They work ok in my setup.  The plan is to remove force_rtp_proxy in 3.2. A wholeheartedly

Re: [SR-Users] LCR weight column question

2010-09-29 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Juha, The awk version of the script is now integrated in kamctl. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:   just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can be used in case

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0.3 tls problems

2010-09-28 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul and...@iptel.org wrote: On Sep 28, 2010 at 18:04, Rouskol Andrey anry-...@yandex.ru wrote: Andrei, When I recompile kamailio with debug options you specified, it works just fine! (no memdbg and memlog options in cfg file). If I

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0.3 tls problems

2010-09-28 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Daniel, What do you think about moving the (k) presence modules to standard for the next 3.1 kamailio release? Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul and...@iptel.org wrote: On Sep 28, 2010 at 11:29, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote: On Tue, Sep

Re: [SR-Users] LCR weight column question

2010-09-27 Thread Ovidiu Sas
If the script can be provided in bash, then it would be nice to be integrated in kamctl: - kamctl lcr weight_eval weight_1 weight_2 ... weight_n Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: you can create as well

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

2010-09-22 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Am 21.09.2010 17:12, schrieb Ovidiu Sas: Hello all, I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from the rtpproxy (k) module. Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used

[SR-Users] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

2010-09-21 Thread Ovidiu Sas
of force_rtp_proxy is provided by rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer; - rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config. Objections? Regards, Ovidiu Sas ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

2010-09-21 Thread Ovidiu Sas
/answer is just extra work load (given the fact that both are just wrappers around a single function). I would go for a clean layout ... but ... Vox Populi, Vox Dei :) Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote: On 09/21/2010 11:27 AM, Daniel

[SR-Users] missing rtpproxy documentatio from kamailio website

2010-09-21 Thread Ovidiu Sas
The kamailio doc website doesn't have the new rtpproxy module documentation: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/ Also, ratelimit module is listed as being k and in fact it is generic now. Regards, Ovidiu Sas ___ SIP Express Router (SER

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

2010-09-21 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Long time ago I did a brief description on how bridging can be achieved. It was for openser but it is still valid: http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@openser.org/msg04806.html Probably we should add this to the rtpproxy module documentation. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

2010-09-21 Thread Ovidiu Sas
There is no other more user friendly procedure for the 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation. The existence of SDP in the initial INVITE must be checked. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote: 2010/9/21 Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com: Why

Re: [SR-Users] Change in RTP Payload time on the fly

2010-09-19 Thread Ovidiu Sas
and analyze the jitter on both incoming and outgoing rtp stream. If this doesn't have any effect, then the code needs to be instrumented to see what exactly is going on (by adding specific probes for your specific tests). It would be interesting to see your results. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Sat, Sep

Re: [SR-Users] Change in RTP Payload time on the fly

2010-09-18 Thread Ovidiu Sas
. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Pranav Desai pde...@signalogic.com wrote: Hello, We have a proxy server setup that runs Kamailiov3.0.1 + RTPProxyv1.2.1. Nathelper support has been enabled in Kamailio. On a certain route, we call force_rtp_proxy(z120), i.e

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.03

2010-09-09 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Radius can be enabled without modifying the Makefile. Before compiling set ENABLE_RADIUS_ACC=true ENABLE_RADIUS_ACC=true make ENABLE_RADIUS_ACC=true make install Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 September 2010 15:00, Ovidiu Sas o

Re: [SR-Users] Using multiple media proxy pools

2010-09-02 Thread Ovidiu Sas
://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id2610143 After that, before invoking force/unforce_rtp_proxy, you will need to set the proper set id for each rtpproxy server: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id2607313 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Sep

Re: [SR-Users] ratelimit module migration from (k) to generic

2010-08-31 Thread Ovidiu Sas
/ obsolete git mv module_k/ratelimit modules Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:  Hello, On 8/31/10 6:24 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: Hello all, The (k) ratelimit module is an enhanced version of the original (s) ratelimit module

Re: [SR-Users] Question about rate limiting a subscriber

2010-06-24 Thread Ovidiu Sas
, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com wrote: I have a customer who has just started operating a dialer.  Over the past couple of days this dialer has been creating some minor issues with our US48 termination.  We are currently running Server:: Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] dialog module: in-early-dialog requests / race conditions

2010-06-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote: Hi, Ovidiu Sas wrote: On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote: 2.) Various race conditions may generate log messages such as following when DID mode is enabled

Re: [SR-Users] dialog module: in-early-dialog requests / race conditions

2010-06-22 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote: Hello, I have two issues related to dialog module state keeping/logging that caught my attention today: 1.) The module considers requests routed in early (but not yet confirmed) dialogs to be bogus, as can be seen

Re: [SR-Users] RPID Mod Question

2010-05-05 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Now, that you got everything you need, you should document this on the wiki (so others could find the info without asking on the mailing list). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:08 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Alex.. Excellent information. Regards, Stephen. On 5

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-05-04 Thread Ovidiu Sas
No AVPs or vars. The encoding field separator can be specified via params: http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k/siputils/siputils.html#id2574949 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Uriel Rozenbaum uriel.rozenb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Guys, I'll

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-04-30 Thread Ovidiu Sas
in-dialog request, you check if the RURI is encoded and you decode and then route normally. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/siputils.html#id2587362 I was using this method with success with several switches. Hope this helps. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Uriel

<    1   2