Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-18 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi Daniel, Just curious, were you able to investigate on the error message? I am still unable to get it working. regards Ganesh Kumar On 10/14/16, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > I have pasted the entire log here for your ref. > >

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-14 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi, I have pasted the entire log here for your ref. http://paste.fedoraproject.org/449906/14764350/ thanks Ganesh Kumar On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > the initial INVITE must be without a to-tag, so that's fine... > > I will try to see the reason

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the initial INVITE must be without a to-tag, so that's fine... I will try to see the reason for the t_load_contacts(). Cheers, Daniel On 14/10/16 10:31, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > > I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field. > > regards > Ganesh Kumar > >

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-14 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi, I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field. regards Ganesh Kumar On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts () || t_next_contacts () in two >> to see which one fails? > After splitting, I get this error. > > Oct 14 08:14:01

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-14 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi, On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts () || t_next_contacts () in two > to see which one fails? After splitting, I get this error. Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: siputils

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts () || t_next_contacts () in two to see which one fails? Cheers, Daniel On 13 Oct 2016 16:51, "Infinicalls Infinicalls" wrote: > Hi, > > >> Oct 13 07:41:15 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[32948]: ERROR: > >>

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-13 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi, >> Oct 13 07:41:15 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[32948]: ERROR: >>

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 13/10/16 09:51, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I find only this error message in syslog. Rest are normal. > > Oct 13 07:41:15 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[32948]: ERROR: >

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-13 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi Daniel, I find only this error message in syslog. Rest are normal. Oct 13 07:41:15 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[32948]: ERROR:

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, stun and outbound don't have anything to do with DNS resolving. Run with debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and see the logs for more details. Cheers, Daniel On 12/10/16 16:46, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > From the log files, I can see .. > > Oct 12 14:43:06 infinicalls

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-12 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi, From the log files, I can see .. Oct 12 14:43:06 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13198]: INFO: stun [kam_stun.c:169]: stun_parse_header(): INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message I have modified the $du field now. Instead of taking values from REGISTRARIP and

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, this is typically because the address in r-uri (or outbound proxy $du) cannot be resolved with the DNS server. Try to run with debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and look at the logs for hints about what happens. Cheers, Daniel On 07/10/16 10:48, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi Daniel, > By

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the REGISTER has a PATH header, the path extension has to be enabled in registrar module -- perhaps we should make this default, given that it is a common scenario out there to have an edge proxy/load balancer in front of registrar. Cheers, Daniel On 07/10/16 10:42, Infinicalls

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-07 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi Daniel, By pasting the following to the registrar config file, I stopped getting Bad Extension error. And I am able to stay online. But while dialing, it gives the "I am terribly sorry..." error. modparam("path", "use_received", 1) modparam("registrar", "use_path", 1) modparam("registrar",

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-07 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi Daniel, I am pasting a fresh REGISTER request and the error message here. The Proxy and Registrar config files are taken from http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/outbound.html - root@infinicalls:~# ngrep -d any -qt -W byline . port 5060 interface: any filter: (ip or

Re: [SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you provide the REGISTER request as well -- it is important to see what it asks for. Cheers, Daniel On 06/10/16 11:35, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi all, > I am testing Edge Proxy setup with the example given here : >

[SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

2016-10-06 Thread Infinicalls Infinicalls
Hi all, I am testing Edge Proxy setup with the example given here : http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/outbound.html and I get this error : U 2016/10/06 09:18:48.331580 10.0.0.4:5060 -> 52.233.25.164:5060 SIP/2.0 420 Bad Extension. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP