Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/5/11 12:40 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com mailto:mico...@gmail.com wrote: Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see how any of our implementations would actually

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-05 Thread Alex Balashov
On 05/05/2011 10:40 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: There is an workaround for your version as well, just copy the content of the branch route in the 'route[xyz] {...}' and then execute route(xyz); in the branch route. Should work, it is the way I have my configs. That's what I do. But

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/5/11 4:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: On 05/05/2011 10:40 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: There is an workaround for your version as well, just copy the content of the branch route in the 'route[xyz] {...}' and then execute route(xyz); in the branch route. Should work, it is the way I

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-04 Thread Alex Balashov
Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case. On 05/04/2011 12:34 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: Hi, I'm currently migrating a Kamailio 1.5 installation to Kamailio 3.1.3, and I got all

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/4/11 6:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case. Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire transaction and all its branches -- the