Do you mean ROHC ?
2015-03-14 12:39 GMT+08:00 Maxim Sobolev sobo...@sippysoft.com:
Do you have any particular RFC in mind?
On Mar 12, 2015 10:28 AM, John Mathew john.mat...@divoxmedia.com
wrote:
Hi,
Maxim,
Is there any plans for rtp header compression in future. I can't see
anything in
Hi all,
Have found a few threads on this before which have clarified my understanding a
little but not yet presented me with a solution.
I am using dialog_ng. dlg_manage() is deprecated and as per the documentation,
I am simply setting a dialog flag early in the request_route.
Kamctl
Hi Carsten,
I must apologize for taking so long to respond... I'm very sorry... and
for your help, thanks so much! Like you suspect, the problem was the
DNS: the IPs was ok, the names too, but, what a fool! I put wrong ports,
change that and everything work OK!
Now I'm having another
Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route?
Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what
actions from kamailio.cfg are executed.
Just changing the $ru and relaying should work when used in request_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 14:14, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
I
Hello,
it is possible to remove and add headers are needed. Storing and
retrieving values is possible with htable or dialog vars or external
storage (sql/nosql). Also, From/To headers can be changed and restored
using header parameters, so nothing has to be stored locally.
To be able to give
Hello,
On 14/03/15 18:00, canuck15 wrote:
I am trying to decipher a kamailio.cfg file for a particular open
source project.
There are problems with authentication and I am trying to understand why.
They use the following lines for authentication check
if (!auth_check($fd, subscriber, 0))
Hello,
On 12/03/15 17:51, canuck15 wrote:
I am reading the documentation for the ipops module dns_int_match_ip()
function and it states the following:
Returns TRUE if ipaddr is associated by DNS to hostname. FALSE
otherwise. It uses internal DNS resolver. At this moment, the function
might
I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message is
the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference i
that I use $ru=sip:+$tU+@+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs append_branch(sip:$tU@
$(du{s.select,1,:}))
This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at
Hello,
can you give an example of incoming header and how you want to be after
modification?
It is not clear for me what end result you want/expect.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/15 06:41, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma.
My
If I use
$ru=sip:+$tU+@+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com:
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru=sip:+$tU+@+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
Hello Daniel,
I want do clean up on routes from first SUBSCRIBE, that when traffic goes to
public side of kamailio will be only public route and when traffic is internal
the Record-Route will stay internal only. In SDP I see like this.
I tired double routes set 0 in rr, but didn't clean
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru=sip:+$tU+@+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for
On 16 Mar 2015, at 16:37, Dirk Teurlings Signet B.V. engineer...@signet.nl
wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in
Kamailio.
# kamctl stats shmem
The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is there any
way to get the
I think I resolved it by removing the BYE and UPDATE from the conditional
that goes towards manage_branch/manage_relay.
Now to just sort out my 603 error with sipML5. You wouldn't happen to know
of a way to force clients to reset their SIP stack state? I'm having the
problem of the second call
Hello
Just modify RURI, t_relay(), and a new branch will automatically be created
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route?
Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what
actions
Hi,
We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in
Kamailio.
# kamctl stats shmem
The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is
there any way to get the committed size of memory for each of the
PKG_MEMORY pools?
If not, could this be added at
A little more information.
In processing the INVITE request I generate an async charging request. That
calls back with the result of that charging request in a separate route block.
It is there that the INVITE continues to be processed. I am guessing that the
dialog_ng adds the DID to the
Hi,
I accidently deleted my domain from iptel.org. I went to re-create my
account and it will not let me.
Domain: kingfetty.com
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = sip: + $tU + @ + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi(sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:}));
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm
Hello,
can you paste here the BYE request? It should be routed via alias
parameter or some other header in order to make it via a websocket
connection, because the contact over websocket is just some random
string. Typical config is to use set_contact_alias() for INVITE and
handle_ruri_alias()
Hi,
We got interoperability issues with older SIP-clients. When e.g. some
parameters are included in the SIP header Record-Route the call does not
get connected. Now we are looking for a solution for that. We are using
kamailio as SIP-registrar/proxy and would like to know if we can keep
the
On Saturday 14 March 2015 19:05:36 Niraj Roy wrote:
User A--- Kamailio (K1)--- Freeswitch (F1)Kamailio(K1)---User B.
Since User B is registered with K2. K1 being a public server won't be able
to initiate any call to User B because there is no TCP connection
established with it.
Can
Hello,
Since you are sharing location database, you might consider using Path.
Cheers,
Charles
On 15 Mar 2015 08:52, Niraj Roy techfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is the setup I have configured.
--Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer
-- Three freeswitch
24 matches
Mail list logo
