Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio cannot be installed in ubuntu

Hi, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Ashutosh chaubey wrote: > Hi, > i was able to start kamailio service without database configuration but > after the database configuration its giving the following error : - > [..] > Jul 28 16:37:51 coditas-Vostro-3446

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio inserting Quote " mark in SIP header

Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Arslan Saeed wrote: > We are seeing that Kamailio's nat_helper_module function  of > add_rcv_param(), inserts " (quote) mark to some of the SIP headers (as > below in the contact header in sip 200 OK response) > > Contact: >

Re: [SR-Users] [ *SPAM* 5.1 ] Re: carrierroute and failure route

Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > I use this in WITHINDLG to handle reINVITEs > > else if ( is_method("INVITE") ) { > record_route(); > > or T.38 fax behind NAT doesn't work at all. Actually that shouldn't be the case. I know,

Re: [SR-Users] On the fly Change

Hi, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Logeshwaran G wrote: > Is it possible to use the LCR reload command with the xmlrpc module? Of course. You can use xmlrpc or jsonrpc, whichever you prefer. You need the xhttp module as a dependency though. Best Regards, Sebastian

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine : question about RTP/RTCP multiplexing (RFC 5761) and demultiplexing

Hi, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Abdoul Osséni wrote: > Does this mean that uac must be compliance with RFC 5761 if I want multiplex > and demultiplex RTP/RTCP between UAC and rtpengine? I don't know whether I understand your question correctly, but the options in

Re: [SR-Users] On the fly Change

Unless you want to trigger that after receiving some kind of "SIP control packet", you would rather add something like this in your kamailio.cfg: event_route[xhttp:request] { if ($hu =~ "^/jsonrpc") { xlog("L_NOTICE", "Got jsonrpc request, body '$rb'\n"); jsonrpc_dispatch(); } else {

Re: [SR-Users] [Solved] Re: Reinvite, rewrite reply SDP?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > Problem was that SDPs in reinvite sequence have already "nortpproxy=yes" > flag set (from initial INVITE transaction I think), and SDP rewriting just > don't triggers when it should. Oh, I've seen that before. User Agents

Re: [SR-Users] On the fly Change

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Logeshwaran G wrote: > Also If I commented the dispatch_rpc(); > Kamailio is running but it dosent accepting the http request. > Please Guide me. Actually, it is all documented in the xmlrpc module. My example was for using jsonrpc,

Re: [SR-Users] What happens to calls when Kamailio restarts?

Hi, On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > All SIP messages passing through the proxy can be forwarded statelessly > and based on properties of the SIP message alone. There's one thing that could happen: Calls that get cancelled after a restart,

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua reload - what exactly gets reloaded?

Hi, On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > You can check a shared memory variable (like $sht(...) or $shv(...)) > that you can change via rpc, so you can re-fetch the database records > even if you don't change the lua script. I've implemented it

Re: [SR-Users] about rtpengine-[offer-answer] via-branch flag

Hi, On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Is the note about "serial forking" correct or should it be about > "parallel forking" instead? In case of serial forking, it would not > matter if the whole call is deleted, because a new offer would be issued > for

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio cannot be installed in ubuntu

Hi, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Ashutosh chaubey wrote: > Jul 28 11:37:22 coditas-Vostro-3446 kamailio[5293]: ERROR: loading config > file(/usr/local/kamailio-4.4/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg): No such file or > directory That's the actual error. Looks to me as if

Re: [SR-Users] error using avp_db_load with mongodb

Hi, I've seen this before, but with MySQL. Kamailio is pretty strict with data types of database fields. IIRC I tried to use it with a view and the view returned a string value where Kamailio expected an integer and threw the same error. So maybe you might want to check the reference structure of

Re: [SR-Users] remote ip address of sender and receiver

Hi, where do you get the IP address of the receiver from? You can get the local interface address of Kamailio where the request was received with $Ri, but I guess you want the IP address of the target host. If you are dealing with locally registered users only, you can use the request URI after

Re: [SR-Users] How to convert ipv6 to ipv4 address inside message body

Hi, On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Narayan P wrote: > But when 183 session progress came ,kamailio is sending its ipv6 address to > pjsip client inside sdp body.So that it is not accepting and 488 error > message is giving. > > > How to convert ipv6 to ipv4 inside

Re: [SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

t a quick check: is route[li] supposed to be route[magic]? Otherwise > it is missing from your example. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 03.07.17 10:04, Sebastian Damm wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> since there really isn't much to find about the lock() function, can >> so

Re: [SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

Hi Daniel, thanks for the reply. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > the last log message is outside of the lock()/unlock(), so it can > printed whenever the OS decides to allocate CPU for it. You should move > it inside the locked block, but

Re: [SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

Okay, this is the order from my first mail: (1) Jun 28 13:27:04 busch /usr/sbin/kamailio[18836]: INFO:

Re: [SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

Hi, On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Can you paste here the parameters for cfgutils module related to locks? Wow, that's what I missed. I didn't set any parameter at all. I didn't expect the locking to not work at all if I don't set it. I

Re: [SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Meanwhile, the one thing you cans till check is to be sure $ci is the > same in both cases, print it with xlog, but within some chars (quotes, > parenthesis) to be sure the is no white space around it. In my

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua reload - what exactly gets reloaded?

Hi, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > the reload command marks the scripts specified by 'load' parameter to be > reloaded next time they are going to be used. That's what I saw in the debug logs. But what does that exactly mean? I thought the

[SR-Users] Using lock() correctly

Hi, for a project I need to make sure, I have a setup where I get mirror-traffic into Kamailio which has to do something with it. To work correctly, I need to make sure, the initial INVITE is processed correctly before any reply to the same call. So I thought I use lock() and unlock() for it.

[SR-Users] app_lua reload - what exactly gets reloaded?

Hi, we have written some logic for a project in lua. There is a small function that gets called from Kamailio, but the main logic is done in a self-written module. That module does initialize some values from database on the first request that comes in. Now when reloading app_lua from kamcmd or

[SR-Users] htable Arrays and dbmode 1

Hi, I'm trying to use a htable array. For that, I have inserted some values in the database (in pseudo CSV): key_name; key_type; value_type; key_value '1234567'; 1; 0; 'foo' '1234567', 1, 0, 'bar' '1234567', 1, 0, 'baz' insert into htable (key_name , key_type , value_type , key_value ) values

Re: [SR-Users] how to remove a line in sdp

Hi, On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Sunil More wrote: > I have the following SDP coming in from a carrier and would like to remove > the following line. Cant figure how to go about it. sdpops should do what you need:

Re: [SR-Users] error using avp_db_load with mongodb

Hi, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:03 PM, hdssdsdsdsfsdf hdssdsdsdsfsdf wrote: > if (avp_db_load("$to/username", "$avp(s:email)")) { > xlog("bla02"); > } $to is not a valid pseudo variable. You

Re: [SR-Users] carrierroute and failure route

Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > First one works OK, but if second route triggers, the following disaster > occurs (tshark dump) https://pastebin.com/00Ayty36 it's not really a disaster. The Mediant2000 sends out a reINVITE after the call was established.

Re: [SR-Users] [ *SPAM* 5.1 ] Re: carrierroute and failure route

Hi, On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > Problem was magically solved by replacing t_relay in CR route by route > (RELAY) :) Okay, the only thing route(RELAY) does more is set the reply route. So maybe your replies were not correctly handled in first place. (And it

Re: [SR-Users] carrierroute and failure route

Hi, On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > Gotcha! I've added fix_nated_contact() to [NATDETECT] route and now all > messages UNTIL reinvite occurs are with correct NATed IP in "Contact" field. while fix_nated_contact() may work in your scenario, it is generally a

[SR-Users] Consistency: -1 sometimes true, sometimes false

Hi, we recently stumbled upon the following problem: We had something like this in our route: $var(ret) = allow_address("2"); if ($var(ret)) { do_something; } Turns out, this always evaluates to true, no matter whether the IP address really is in address group 2 or not. The values in

Re: [SR-Users] Consistency: -1 sometimes true, sometimes false

Hi, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Makes me think that the return value of functions cannot be captured by > assigning an arbitrary variable in this manner: Well, I printed out the content of the variable while debugging and it carried 1 or -1

[SR-Users] Documenation of functions exported for KEMI

Hi, I was wondering whether there is some kind of documentation of all functions currently exported for KEMI by Kamailio modules. I know I can find them somehow via grep, but I could not find a page in the Kamailio wiki listing all of them. Is there any? Best Regards, Sebastian

Re: [SR-Users] On the fly Change

I'm afraid I have no idea what you are doing. You already had the requests coming to your Kamailio this morning when you tried using dispatch_rpc() inside your xhttp event route. You posted an error log line. I don't know what the "http postman" is and what it does. All I know is that my example

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua and sqlops returns error

Hi, On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> thanks for the reply. I just set up a test configuration for KEMI, and >> it does work when loading an external lua script. However, it would be >> nice if I could write my 5 lines of glue code (I have

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua and sqlops returns error

Hi Daniel, thanks for the reply. I just set up a test configuration for KEMI, and it does work when loading an external lua script. However, it would be nice if I could write my 5 lines of glue code (I have written a class for all my functions) within my kamailio.cfg. Is this somehow possible?

[SR-Users] app_lua and sqlops returns error

Hi, I'm developing some routing logic with Kamailio 5.0.1 and app_lua. I've integrated my lua script and now I'm trying to use sqlops within the script. I want to use the reconnect stuff of sqlops instead of implementing it by myself. This is what the Kamailio config looks like: [..] loadmodule

[SR-Users] See how many workers are actually processing packets?

Hi, I think this has been answered before, but I don't know the answer. Is there a way to find out, how many workers are busy right now processing packets? For a new setup I don't know whether I need 16 or 96 UDP listeners, but I'd like to scale it correctly. The setup just inspects HEP messages

Re: [SR-Users] Proxy Invite to registered natted user

Hi, since this is still unanswered: On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:01 AM, eskornev wrote: > Trying to set Kamailio as proxy in front of Asterisk. > > When natted user registers is remembered in Kamailio via save("location"). > Kamailio forwards Register to * with new contact

Re: [SR-Users] private memory leak - but where?

Hi Daniel, thanks for the quick response. See my other mail with more details. I don't use cfg variable from the lua script, I only access $shv(...) and $vn(...) or $var(...) and $sht(...) from it. And of course $tU, $hdr(...) and other builtin variables. Some of the variables I'm accessing

Re: [SR-Users] private memory leak - but where?

quot;) > > The issue is known, there were other reporting it here on the mailing > list. It's in my to-do before 5.1 to fix it in a way or another, by > either setting a limit of defined variables and then throw error > (easier), or track when a variable is used and start deleting the >

Re: [SR-Users] Encryption of voice stream

Hello, since Kamailio does not deal with voice streams, it depends on the voice gateway or B2BUA or devices you plan to use. Kamailio handles only signalling, and it can deal with TLS encrypted SIP. BR Sebastian On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Vasan VS wrote: > Hello all,

Re: [SR-Users] custom kamailio-x.deb package

Hi, did you see that there are debian folders coming with your kamailio source code? I think all you have to do is symlink the correct folder to the root project folder so it is accessible under /path/to/kamailio-sources/debian and you should be ready to go. Then your dpkg-buildpackage command

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine - optional srtp

Hello, On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: > That's not currently supported (neither as an offerer nor as an accepter). > AFAIK the usual mantra is to offer SRTP first and then fallback to RTP when > a "not supported" (415) is received. I tried the solution

Re: [SR-Users] unexpected behavior of save from registrar module

Hi, indeed, when a function returns with 0, Kamailio immediately ends the processing of the packet. So that's why the unlock statement is never executed. I am wondering, why you are using locks at this point. That way, only one REGISTER can be processed at the same time, since they all share the

Re: [SR-Users] Q: purpose of t_newtran() in kamailio-basic.cfg route[LOCATION]?

Hi, my guess would be that's only for accounting. If I remember correctly, the acc module won't record this call if a transaction was never created. So the transaction gets created before sending out the reply. I could be wrong, though. :) Best Regards, Sebastian On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:28

Re: [SR-Users] Map Technique(Key value pair) in kamailio

Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Logeshwaran G wrote: > Is there any way to use the Mapping technique in kamailio. > > For Example: > == > > Key = 91, Value = India > Key = 92, Value = Srilanka > > How to store Key Value Pairs into kamailio and how to

Re: [SR-Users] Incorrect value when setting number like values in Htable using Kamcmd

Hi, On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Tony - Telecomy wrote: > I'm having an issue setting phone numbers values in htable using kamcmd when > the phone number is above the integer range 2147483647. > > Initially I planned to set the values as strings but this is not working as >

Re: [SR-Users] Send 407 for Invite

Hello, http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/auth.html Sebastian On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Logeshwaran G wrote: > Hi, > > How to send the 407 proxy authentication for Invite message? > > Input Please > > Thanks & Kind Regards, > Logeshwaran G > >

Re: [SR-Users] Handeling Proxy Cancel event

Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Abdul Basit wrote: > I am trying to capture and distinguish two types of cancels generated by > kamailio. > 1- Cancel when Invite timeout 408 You can catch this one in failure route. Whenever an INVITE times out and you have set

Re: [SR-Users] Consistency: -1 sometimes true, sometimes false

Hi Daniel, thanks für the explanation. Best Regards, Sebastian On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > On 23.08.17 10:36, Alex Balashov wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:34:03AM +0200, Sebastian Damm wrote

Re: [SR-Users] Handeling Proxy Cancel event

Hi, On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mikko Lehto wrote: > Maybe t_is_canceled() works for your scenario: Without having tested this, I would expect, that the transaction is not cancelled but answered. You might be able to catch it with t_on_branch_failure:

Re: [SR-Users] Change on the fly logging verbosity - Kamailio v5.0.2

Hi, I think you are looking for cfg_rpc: http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/cfg_rpc.html HTH Sebastian On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > Hello, > > > at this moment i try to figure out the best way to add an "switch" for >

Re: [SR-Users] Call transfer between pbx servers behind kamailio proxy

Hi, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Iskren Hadzhinedev wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm having a hard time transferring calls when the users are on different > FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio. We had to solve that problem a while ago, too. Only with Asterisk instead

Re: [SR-Users] How to check 4XX/5XX response in general.

Hi, you can use a regex match for that as well. if ($rs =~ "^[45].*") { # do something } HTH Sebastian On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:34 AM, vi...@advaitamtech.com wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is there any way to catch all 4XX and 5XX SIP error codes rather then > specifying

Re: [SR-Users] how to add new media server in dispatcher table through "ANSIBLE"

Hi, we deploy our gateways through ansible, and while doing that we insert a database entry for the gateway into the dispatcher table. After that, we issue a dispatcher.reload on our Kamailio servers. You need some delegate_to statements in your playbook, but this way we can add gateways

Re: [SR-Users] OpenSIPS-devel not starting (TCP Error)

Hi, I think you ended up on the wrong mailing list. This list is for Kamailio, not OpenSIPS. You might want to ask your question again somewhere here: https://www.opensips.org/Support/MailingLists Regards, Sebastian On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:33 PM, SamyGo wrote: > P.S: >

Re: [SR-Users] How to change To header URI from Kamailio?

Hi, most user agents ignore the domain and port in the from header. Your UAC must be special. However, the uac module has some functions to help you. But don't forget to restore it on the way back. Regards, Sebastian On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Arun NV wrote: > Hi,

Re: [SR-Users] t_relay dying ?

Hi, On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Jean Cérien wrote: > > Thanks for this answer. The voip provider is not really eager to alter its > SBC as it considers that the contact field is not mandatory in the ACK. The > RFC states (section 8.1.1.8) > The problem is not that

Re: [SR-Users] two Kamailio instances suddenly stopped handling packets

; Do you have other lock() / unlock() in the config? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 12.01.18 08:49, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi, > > this morning, two Kamailio servers suddenly stopped working after having > worked without a problem for months. Both are running 5.0.2 on Debian

[SR-Users] two Kamailio instances suddenly stopped handling packets

Hi, this morning, two Kamailio servers suddenly stopped working after having worked without a problem for months. Both are running 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie. Those systems only analyze mirrored traffic and write some information to a RabbitMQ. I tried restarting, but after a few seconds they get

Re: [SR-Users] t_relay dying ?

Hi Jean, as pointed out earlier, the ACK is probably broken. Every packet after the 200 OK should have the contact of the 200 OK in the Request URI. Your example packet carries probably the original request URI, which is most certainly wrong, exept if you use some topology hiding. This is

Re: [SR-Users] UDP workers block when one or more rtpengine instances go offline

Hi Daniel, On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 2:17 PM Daniel Tryba wrote: > No answer to you question (which sounds like a legit problem), but why > not do it with: > kamcmd rtpengine.enable udp:x.y.z.a:port 0/1 > on the kamailio machines? Of course, that's probably the better way. But as far as I know,

Re: [SR-Users] UDP workers block when one or more rtpengine instances go offline

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:56 PM Daniel Tryba wrote: > BTW forgot to ask: are you REJECTing or DROPing packets? > A reject should trigger a failover in the rtpengine_* calls immediately. Of course, we block the traffic with a REJECT rule. > A drop will result in a timeout mechanism triggering,

[SR-Users] UDP workers block when one or more rtpengine instances go offline

Hi, we run multiple rtpengine servers to share the load. Whenever we need to take an rtpengine server offline, we used to just block the control port via iptables, then no new calls ended up on this instance of rtpengine. This worked pretty well in Kamailio 4.4.5. However, since Kamailio 5.0,

Re: [SR-Users] UDP workers block when one or more rtpengine instances go offline

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:04 PM Richard Fuchs wrote: > On 2018-08-06 06:58, Sebastian Damm wrote: > When you query the running config via kamcmd for the value of > rtpengine_tout_ms, what does it say? (Wondering if the default value of > 1000 properly gets established or if some

Re: [SR-Users] TLS testing (with sipp)

quot; callee="12012343...@ep.domain.com" > max_duration="15" hangup="5" > username="VP_ENV_USERNAME" password="VP_ENV_PASSWORD" > realm="domain.com" > /> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at

[SR-Users] TLS testing (with sipp)

hints or examples. Regards, Sebastian -- Sebastian Damm Voice Engineer __ sipgate GmbH Gladbacher Straße 74 | 40219 Düsseldorf ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https

Re: [SR-Users] Parallel forking and rtpengine handling

h impossible to be answered in certain scenarios. Regards and thanks for all the answers so far. Sebastian -- Sebastian Damm Voice Engineer __ sipgate GmbH Gladbacher Straße 74 | 40219 Düsseldorf ___ Kamailio (S

Re: [SR-Users] Same Via Tag for INVITE and ACK on S/L loadbalancer

a stateless proxy. > > > > I am not sure I remember correctly, but in some discussions I think it > > was suggested to just reuse the branch value of incoming top Via when > > doing stateless forwarding. > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > > On 10

[SR-Users] Same Via Tag for INVITE and ACK on S/L loadbalancer

dvance Sebastian -- Sebastian Damm Voice Engineer __ sipgate GmbH ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Same Via Tag for INVITE and ACK on S/L loadbalancer

We use 5.2 on the affected systems. On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:15 PM Serge S. Yuriev wrote: > > Hi > > I believe you are using 5.2 or 5.3 series? This tend to work properly on 5.1 > series > > 10.02.2020, 18:10, "Sebastian Damm" : > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [SR-Users] Same Via Tag for INVITE and ACK on S/L loadbalancer

It has to be different. May > be it is better to point provider to this? > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, 14:26 Sebastian Damm, wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I stumbled upon an interop problem with a carrier. We have the >> following scenario: >> >> Gateway --> Loadbalanc

[SR-Users] Parallel forking and rtpengine handling

use the "via-branch" parameter. Now, when one branch answers the call, what happens to the other branch? I there a way to delete the other branch? How and in which route? Or does Kamailio do this automatically? I'm happy for a hint. Regards, Sebastian -- Sebastian Damm Voic

[SR-Users] Open separate TCP streams to the same destination

Hi, I have a peer that requests separate TCP connections for each registration to their server. Those registrations run through the same Kamailio instance on my side. Now what I tried is to use tcpops and the tcp_set_otcpid function, supplying a previously nonexistant TCP connection ID

Re: [SR-Users] Best way to ignore HTTP requests

I would probably load the xhttp module and then discard those messages there. See the docs of xhttp, though, there's an option that has to be set to accept requests without Content-Length header. Regards, Sebastian - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Ben Kaufman" An: "sr-users" Gesendet:

Re: [SR-Users] Open separate TCP streams to the same destination

ierla" An: "sr-users" , "Sebastian Damm" Gesendet: Freitag, 12. März 2021 09:27:03 Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Open separate TCP streams to the same destination Hello, that is not possible at this moment, SIP does not associate the sessions or the users with the transport lay

[SR-Users] What does "tls.reload" actually do?

Hi, I noticed a strange behavior on some of our proxy servers, all running Kamailio 5.3.8. After running for some time (weeks), our monitoring system sporadically starts reporting errors. The check connects via tls and registers to an Asterisk behind the proxy server. When this happens, the

Re: [SR-Users] What does "tls.reload" actually do?

Mail - Von: "miconda" An: "sr-users" , "Sebastian Damm" Gesendet: Montag, 30. August 2021 13:28:04 Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] What does "tls.reload" actually do? Hello, does it happen only for connections done by the monitoring system? Or also for the con

[SR-Users] t_suspend() / t_continue() create new branches

Hi, I have the following weird problem. A Kamailio (5.4.x) with some asynchronous permission logic suspends outgoing INVITEs and resumes them after the answer of the permission system. Everything works as expected when the call is answered. However, when the called party rejects the call (with

Re: [SR-Users] t_suspend() / t_continue() create new branches

it could help. Without success. Still stuck at "Why is there another branch after t_suspend and t_continue and how do I make it go away? There's just an evapi call to cgrates in between. Grateful for any ideas. Thanks, Sebastian - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Sebastian Damm"

Re: [SR-Users] t_suspend() / t_continue() create new branches

- Von: "miconda" An: "sr-users" , "Sebastian Damm" Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. November 2021 16:30:19 Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] t_suspend() / t_continue() create new branches Hello, a suspend of a request is practically a branch that is not sent out, which can

Re: [SR-Users] tcp_set_connection_lifetime(1) does not close connection

core#set_reply_close ] On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:49 PM Sebastian Damm < [ mailto:sd...@pascom.net | sd...@pascom.net ] > wrote: Hi, for having a maintenance mode, I need to implement some sort of draining functionality. All our clients register via TLS. So I thought, I just answer the

[SR-Users] tcp_set_connection_lifetime(1) does not close connection

Hi, for having a maintenance mode, I need to implement some sort of draining functionality. All our clients register via TLS. So I thought, I just answer the next REGISTER of a client with a 503 and kill the tcp connection afterwards, so they need to open up a new connection to the

[SR-Users] Kamailio eats pkg mem, but where?

Hi, we have some Kamailio instances running (currently latest 5.4 release), and we need to restart it from time to time. We have a grafana graph showing the pkg memory usage of one random tcp listener, and it increases slowly over time. Config is pure python KEMI. A mem dump directly after

[SR-Users] Re: Dealing with failed SRV peers

? Regards Sebastian From: Henning Westerholt Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 16:59 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Sebastian Damm Subject: RE: Dealing with failed SRV peers Hello Sebastian, actually, it’s the fault is by the provider

[SR-Users] Dealing with failed SRV peers

Hi, we have some Kamailios working as outboundproxy. So they get requests from internal systems and send them to different providers. From time to time, one provider returns a server as primary resource which is currently unavailable. I guess if the internal systems connected directly to the

[SR-Users] Get the amount of open TCP connection from routing logic

Hello, My plan is to reject new inbound requests if there is already a certain number of open connections on one Kamailio server. I could answer with a 503 and directly close the connection forcing the client to reconnect and the loadbalancer to send traffic to a different node on the next

[SR-Users] Re: Get the amount of open TCP connection from routing logic

new requests, and the existing connections will drain slowly. From: David Villasmil Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 13:49 To: Sebastian Damm Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Get the amount of open TCP connection from routing logic

[SR-Users] Re: Get the amount of open TCP connection from routing logic

From: David Villasmil Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 13:11 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Sebastian Damm Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Get the amount of open TCP connection from routing logic Why not just increase the max tcp connections? Also, once you hit it, Kamailio will reset the syn and th