Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-17 Thread Alex Balashov
You are very welcome. Please let me know if you have any ideas on how it might be usefully expanded. Some others have made good suggestions, but unfortunately they present scope challenges because they lie outside the sphere of server-side NAT traversal as such. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:52:08AM

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-17 Thread Asgaroth
Alex, Thank you for this blog post, great work, very helpfull information! Much appreciated. On 11/05/18 15:13, Alex Balashov wrote: Hi, I have updated this article with some other topics: http://blog.csrpswitch.com/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the-definitive-guide/ "The

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-14 Thread Giovanni Maruzzelli
Why not topology hiding, in such cases? Not always clients support TLS... On Mon, May 14, 2018, 20:38 Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi Sergiu, > > Thanks for the suggestion! I've not encountered this on a sufficiently > widespread basis that I personally feel it merits

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-14 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi Sergiu, Thanks for the suggestion! I've not encountered this on a sufficiently widespread basis that I personally feel it merits inclusion in the article, given its already rather broad scope. However, I will certainly have a think on whether there it ought to be incorporated into additional

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-14 Thread Sergiu Pojoga
Hi Alex, Glad to see the mention of SIP Outbound in your updated article. Here's another 5+5 cents of mine that might help others in the future. May be you faced it, may be not, but in the multi-homed scenario that you describe in your article, there may be circumstances under which calls

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-12 Thread Alex Balashov
Thank you, but the scope is ambitious enough that I think it would make most sense to limit it to Kamailio-native approaches only. On May 12, 2018 8:31:58 AM GMT+02:00, Mojtaba wrote: >Hi, >That's greats concept in this regards. >I think it could be great to describe about

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

2018-05-12 Thread Mojtaba
Hi, That's greats concept in this regards. I think it could be great to describe about SEMS (e.g B2BUA, NAT-Traversal) and working it with Kamailio. The SEMS has proper modules to solve NAT Traversal in Kamailio,too If you want, I could give you it's documents. Thanks With Regards.Mojtaba On Fri,