On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 17:24 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Attached is the third version of work-in-progress SSSD/tlog
> integration
> patches. I'm sending them in the hope that somebody takes a look and
> perhaps
> points out some wrong bits I can fix before I'm too
On 08/04/2016 04:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
Over the last couple of weeks, I've talked to several people, mostly
engineers with not too much development experience, who said they would
like to start contributing little fixes to SSSD. I would like to find some
tasks that they can easily
Hello,
I am fighting with adding new option to sssd.conf.
I slowly running out of breath.
I know proxy could be id, auth or chpass provider. I don't know
where is the right place for my option. And the second issue is
it breaks test for SSSD config. :-(
Is there anyone who would like to join
On (24/08/16 13:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (24/08/16 10:53), Petr Cech wrote:
>>On 08/24/2016 09:15 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (22/08/16 16:39), Petr Cech wrote:
>>> > On 08/19/2016 05:18 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> > > Thank you for test but I would appraciate a little bit simpler
On (24/08/16 13:51), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> I didn't run CI tests because your new code is not used yet.
>> But I run my tests for nested_group with your updated version.
>> Everything works how we expected.
>> Code LGTM.
>>
>> => ACK
>
>CI
On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi Lukas,
I didn't run CI tests because your new code is not used yet.
But I run my tests for nested_group with your updated version.
Everything works how we expected.
Code LGTM.
=> ACK
CI passed with my patches:
On (24/08/16 10:53), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/24/2016 09:15 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (22/08/16 16:39), Petr Cech wrote:
>> > On 08/19/2016 05:18 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > Thank you for test but I would appraciate a little bit simpler solution.
>> > >
On (24/08/16 11:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:48:21AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Slebodnik
>> wrote:
>> > On (24/08/16 10:37), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> >>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 11:41 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:29 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>
>>> From 09e5ad3448694d9609bd2a9e89e8a05ef82f66bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>>
>> 2001
>>>
>>> From:
On 08/24/2016 11:41 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:29 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
From 09e5ad3448694d9609bd2a9e89e8a05ef82f66bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:15:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH]
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:29 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> From 09e5ad3448694d9609bd2a9e89e8a05ef82f66bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:15:04 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: cope with time shift
>
> Resolves:
scratch build was tested and fix confirmed. I think we should also
reschedule all existing tevent timers, we don't have an infrastructure
to do it though.
From 09e5ad3448694d9609bd2a9e89e8a05ef82f66bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:48:21AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (24/08/16 10:37), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik
> >>wrote:
> >>> On
On 08/24/2016 09:15 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (22/08/16 16:39), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/19/2016 05:18 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
Thank you for test but I would appraciate a little bit simpler solution.
"memberNisNetgroup"(SYSDB_NETGROUP_MEMBER)
Your patch will append
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/08/16 10:37), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (24/08/16 00:59), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
When saving the user there is a
On (24/08/16 10:37), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (24/08/16 00:59), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>When saving the user there is a comparison between the "cased alias"
>>>and the "lowercase password name". However, the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/08/16 00:59), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>When saving the user there is a comparison between the "cased alias"
>>and the "lowercase password name". However, the first doesn't use fully
>>qualified name while the
On (24/08/16 00:59), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>When saving the user there is a comparison between the "cased alias"
>and the "lowercase password name". However, the first doesn't use fully
>qualified name while the second does, resulting in a not expected
>override of the "nameAlias" attribute of a
On 08/24/2016 07:30 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/08/16 12:35), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/19/2016 11:42 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/19/2016 11:24 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/08/16 08:55), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/18/2016 12:22 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/18/2016 12:19 PM, Lukas Slebodnik
On (22/08/16 16:39), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/19/2016 05:18 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> Thank you for test but I would appraciate a little bit simpler solution.
>> "memberNisNetgroup"(SYSDB_NETGROUP_MEMBER)
>> Your patch will append "memberNisNetgroup"(SYSDB_NETGROUP_MEMBER) to missing
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo