[SSSD] [sssd PR#696][closed] DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/696 Author: thalman Title: #696: DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/696/head:pr696 git checkout pr696

[SSSD] [sssd PR#696][comment] DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/696 Title: #696: DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests jhrozek commented: """ * master: 5565dd365e704f6ded4f95db5bfbefd5dffc888b """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/696#issuecomment-445996712

[SSSD] [sssd PR#696][+Pushed] DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/696 Title: #696: DYNDNS: SSSD does not batch DDNS update requests Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#707][comment] build: remove hardcoded samba include path

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/707 Title: #707: build: remove hardcoded samba include path jhrozek commented: """ * master: 7354e59e010197ab5be3440a0e2c24302298a237 Please let me know if you'd like to have the patch backported to sssd-1-16 as well -- on one hand I'd be fine with it,

[SSSD] [sssd PR#707][closed] build: remove hardcoded samba include path

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/707 Author: gmccollister Title: #707: build: remove hardcoded samba include path Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/707/head:pr707 git checkout pr707

[SSSD] [sssd PR#707][+Pushed] build: remove hardcoded samba include path

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/707 Title: #707: build: remove hardcoded samba include path Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#705][comment] KCM: Add configurable quotas

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/705 Title: #705: KCM: Add configurable quotas jhrozek commented: """ The test failed because of pep8 failures in the test. Now it will hopefully come back clean. Still looking for a reviewer.. """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#705][synchronized] KCM: Add configurable quotas

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/705 Author: jhrozek Title: #705: KCM: Add configurable quotas Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/705/head:pr705 git checkout pr705 From

[SSSD] [sssd PR#702][-Changes requested] NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/702 Title: #702: NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#702][comment] NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/702 Title: #702: NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user jhrozek commented: """ OK, the comment is there. I also did some more changes, because the integration tests started failing intermittently. This was beause each

[SSSD] [sssd PR#702][synchronized] NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/702 Author: jhrozek Title: #702: NSS: Avoid changing the memory cache ownership away from the SSSD user Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/702/head:pr702 git

[SSSD] [sssd PR#711][opened] ipa: use only the global catalog service of the forest root

2018-12-10 Thread sumit-bose
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/711 Author: sumit-bose Title: #711: ipa: use only the global catalog service of the forest root Action: opened PR body: """ While creating the domains and sub-domains each domain gets a global catalog services assigned but only one should be used because

[SSSD] [sssd PR#703][synchronized] nss: sssd returns '/' for emtpy home directories

2018-12-10 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/703 Author: thalman Title: #703: nss: sssd returns '/' for emtpy home directories Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/703/head:pr703 git checkout pr703 From

[SSSD] [sssd PR#708][+Changes requested] TESTS: ldb-tools are required for multihost tests

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/708 Title: #708: TESTS: ldb-tools are required for multihost tests Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#707][+Accepted] build: remove hardcoded samba include path

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/707 Title: #707: build: remove hardcoded samba include path Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#708][comment] TESTS: ldb-tools are required for multihost tests

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/708 Title: #708: TESTS: ldb-tools are required for multihost tests jhrozek commented: """ Well I do test on Fedora, so I care about the patch. The elif RHEL branch is just a bug, we need to fix the dependency detection better, but for now I would prefer

[SSSD] [sssd PR#710][comment] data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/710 Title: #710: data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval jhrozek commented: """ I think this would fix the error, but I have two more questions: 1) Do you agree it would be nice to fix all gethostname() calls in a similar manner? 2) I like the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#710][comment] data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/710 Title: #710: data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval jhrozek commented: """ add to whitelist """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/710#issuecomment-445745812 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#710][comment] data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval

2018-12-10 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/710 Title: #710: data_provider_fo: fix error in hostname retrieval jhrozek commented: """ (Your patches should no longer by gated by centos CI) """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/710#issuecomment-445745904