URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/21
Title: #21: IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through DBus
tequeter commented:
"""
Yes, I considered creating a ```group_attributes``` instead. However it would
have taken more refactoring to avoid duplicating the ```user_attributes`
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/21
Title: #21: IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through DBus
tequeter commented:
"""
> > I considered using the gid provided by SSSD for that purpose (but it is not
> > guaranteed to be consistent on all computers, f
tequeter commented on a pull request
"""
One of my customers has an in-house GNU/Linux desktop application they use on
many remote tiny sites with unreliable WAN links. So far the application was
doing local authn/authz using a database, but the customer is migrating their
r
tequeter's pull request #21: "IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through
DBus" was opened
PR body:
"""
This adds a uniqueID property on User and Group InfoPipe objects. It has a
useful value on AD- and IPA-backed domains. For Active Directory, this is the
GUID.
"""
See the full pull-request
