On (13/04/16 12:09), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 04/12/2016 04:07 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> From c69aff1284c72d1e5bcb633c2499e9fb74f16335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>From: Jakub Hrozek
>>>Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016
On 04/12/2016 04:07 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
From c69aff1284c72d1e5bcb633c2499e9fb74f16335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:35:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] memberof: Fix a
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> From c69aff1284c72d1e5bcb633c2499e9fb74f16335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jakub Hrozek
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:35:39 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] memberof: Fix a memory leak when removing ghost users
>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:01:52PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 11:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the
On 04/07/2016 11:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
> >today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
> >other day..I haven't succeeded
On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
>today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
>other day..I haven't succeeded at that yet, but I found another leak.
>
Even if you will not able to write a