On 07/17/2015 01:26 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have read the wiki pages. And I have the edited version. It would be
difficult to send the diff, so I started a new pages where you can
view the result.
Original pages:
[ 1] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Contribute
[ 2]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/08/15 10:35), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:01:24AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 17:46), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch hardens the p11_child process.
From
On (16/08/15 17:59), Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if some error occurs, but I had some troubles with it so
I gave up eventually.
Of course, it would be quite
On (17/08/15 10:35), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:01:24AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 17:46), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch hardens the p11_child process.
From 4023fb832cc5c5122c235b713c0ef401c5d21dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub
On (17/08/15 10:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if some error occurs, but I had some troubles with
On 08/17/2015 10:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/08/15 10:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/08/15 10:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction
On (14/08/15 14:40), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
this patch is a hotfix for pam-srv-failing
tests.
Increasing the timeout to 30 seconds seems
to be enough. I do not want to make it too
big because the timeout is currently not
configurable.
The observation seems to be correct; at least according to
On 08/17/2015 02:42 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 13:31), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/13/2015 07:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
Seriously? Is that your proposed solution?
Yes, it's better to remove test rather then
have intermittent failures.
On (13/08/15 13:31), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/13/2015 07:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
Seriously? Is that your proposed solution?
Yes, it's better to remove test rather then
have intermittent failures.
You are twisting the plot here. Removing the test
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:03:35PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/08/15 14:45), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/17/2015 01:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (14/08/15 14:40), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
this patch is a hotfix for pam-srv-failing
tests.
Increasing the timeout to 30 seconds
On (17/08/15 14:45), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/17/2015 01:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (14/08/15 14:40), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
this patch is a hotfix for pam-srv-failing
tests.
Increasing the timeout to 30 seconds seems
to be enough. I do not want to make it too
big because the timeout is
On 08/17/2015 01:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (14/08/15 14:40), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
this patch is a hotfix for pam-srv-failing
tests.
Increasing the timeout to 30 seconds seems
to be enough. I do not want to make it too
big because the timeout is currently not
configurable.
The
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:23:02PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/06/2015 02:31 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/05/2015 02:44 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/05/2015 12:11 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/05/2015 11:34 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/04/2015 03:52 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/12/2015 02:23 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
there is a patchset that adds sss_unique_file with an optional
destructor:
https://patchwork.acksyn.org/patch/11351/
Attached are patches that use the function instead of
- Original Message -
From: Nikolai Kondrashov nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com
To: Development of the System Security Services Daemon
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 6:40:36 PM
Subject: [SSSD] [PATCH v3] Remove trailing whitespace
On 08/17/2015 09:37
On 08/17/2015 09:37 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 15:48), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/13/2015 02:57 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 14:47), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
+if GIT_CHECKOUT
+export GIT_DIR=$(abs_top_srcdir)/.git
+export GIT_WORK_TREE=$(abs_top_srcdir)
+endif
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:32:00AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if some error occurs,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/08/15 10:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction
On (14/08/15 15:17), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I wrote patch.
Regards
Petr
From c871c97862997df4e724647f1a0ce7297f2f059b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:17:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TEST: Fix for responder_cache_req-tests
Tests, that do not pass,
On (13/08/15 17:46), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch hardens the p11_child process.
From 4023fb832cc5c5122c235b713c0ef401c5d21dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:25:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] p11child: set restrictive umask and
On (13/08/15 15:48), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/13/2015 02:57 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 14:47), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/11/2015 07:13 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi Pavel,
On 08/11/2015 03:44 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/11/2015 02:11 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On
Hi,
the attached patch was confirmed to work, so the code review should be
easy. But because it adds an index to objectSID, which all AD objects
have, there are two catches:
1) How log the upgrade takes
2) How much the database grows
To test, I created an AD instance with 10.000 users
On 08/17/2015 08:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From c871c97862997df4e724647f1a0ce7297f2f059b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cechpc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:17:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TEST: Fix for responder_cache_req-tests
Tests, that do not pass, have a problem with
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if some error occurs, but I had some troubles with it so
I gave up eventually.
Thanks a
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:01:24AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (13/08/15 17:46), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch hardens the p11_child process.
From 4023fb832cc5c5122c235b713c0ef401c5d21dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 5 Aug
On 08/17/2015 10:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2737
Hi, it should work... :-) However, I wanted to make import as transaction so
no changes are made if some error occurs, but I had some troubles
On (17/08/15 10:17), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/17/2015 08:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From c871c97862997df4e724647f1a0ce7297f2f059b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cechpc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:17:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TEST: Fix for responder_cache_req-tests
Tests, that do
28 matches
Mail list logo
