On (27/08/15 10:56), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (18/08/15 15:31), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>On 08/17/2015 08:42 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>- Original Message -
From: "Nikolai Kondrashov"
To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon"
On 08/27/2015 10:42 AM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
* SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL produces:
...hbac_evaluator.c:150] [< hbac_evaluate()
...hbac_evaluator.c:410] REQUEST:
...hbac_evaluator.c:391] service [sshd]
...hbac_evaluator.c:400] service_group (none)
...hbac_evaluator.c:391] user [csikos]
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:24:21PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 03:13 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >I am doing code review for fixed patch now. Patch looks good to me and
> >it works.
> >
> >I discussed the problem above (about fprintf vs. libpopt) with both
> >offline. The libpopt solution
On 08/31/2015 01:32 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
0x2000
(Mon Aug 31 07:03:04 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [hbac] (0x0100):
[../src/providers/ipa/hbac_evaluator.c:152] [< hbac_evaluate()
(Mon Aug 31 07:03:04 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [hbac] (0x2000):
[../src/providers/ipa/hbac_evaluator.c:409]
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 05:49 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >
> >I agree. Attached is the same patch that was already ACKed,
> >just with the changed name and added const.
> >
> >Michal
>
> Yes, it is the same, with const.
>
> ACK again.
>
> Petr
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (28/08/15 09:46), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >please see trivial patch attached.
> >
> >Thanks!
>
> >From 4b83c3d1b050ff9f9bfe713c373f257e0eb88d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Pavel Reichl
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/08/15 16:09), Michal Židek wrote:
> >On 08/21/2015 04:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>On 08/21/2015 02:35 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>some of the tests you deleted are valid and
> >>>should not be deleted.
> >>>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ACK
>
> LS
* master: 11e8f3ecdddf8edd8b1bbe9f41b49ce8b709b92a
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:20:15PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 02:44 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >see the attached patch for ticket
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1697
> >
> >I think this is a candidate to include in our
> >coding guidelines.
> >
> I agree. It is a
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:19:00PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 01:11 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >please see trivial patch fixing coverity warning.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >0001-LDAP-end-on-ENOMEM.patch
> >
> >
> > From 69c20ca306827a558d6be015d0d060f9f46423f8 Mon Sep 17
On 08/31/2015 03:08 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/10/2015 04:27 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
From 725cb791d43e9f651345ec50419143c4e6bd22b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:16:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] SYSDB: Add
On 08/31/2015 06:29 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/08/15 16:09), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/21/2015 04:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/21/2015 02:35 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
some of the tests you deleted are valid and
should
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:23:29AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> please review attached patch for regression #2772
>
> LS
Hi Lukas,
thank you for taking care of the issue.
The patch is working as expected without breaking the SID lookups and
passes the CI
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:33:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ACK
> >
> > LS
>
> * master: 11e8f3ecdddf8edd8b1bbe9f41b49ce8b709b92a
This patch broke distcheck:
../src/util/sss_cli_cmd.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (19/08/15 23:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >as we're stabilizing the 1.13 branch and before we plan what we want to
> >work on during the 1.14 development, we should use that time to write
> >some more tests!
> >
> >Here
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:24:13PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:38 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >as we're stabilizing the 1.13 branch and before we plan what we want to
> >work on during the 1.14 development, we should use that time to write
> >some more tests!
> >
> >Here are
On 08/31/2015 01:09 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization of
iterative variables in forloops.
On 08/31/2015 01:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:19PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to ask you what you think
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Yes, this e-mail was about
Sorry, I fat-fingered the first mail. This e-mail was about where should
we concentrate our effort to add more tests in the next couple of weeks
as we stabilize 1.13 and before we start on 1.14.
On 08/31/2015 01:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:24:13PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:38 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
as we're stabilizing the 1.13 branch and before we plan what we want to
work on during the 1.14 development, we should use that time to
On 08/31/2015 01:18 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
0x0080
(Mon Aug 31 06:57:09 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [ipa_hbac_evaluate_rules]
(0x0080): Access granted by HBAC rule [Test_rule]
(Mon Aug 31 06:57:09 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [ipa_hbac_evaluate_rules]
(0x0080): Access denied by HBAC rules
On (30/08/15 15:31), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 09:03 +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization of
>> iterative variables in forloops. I know that present code style does not
>> allow it. But how I recognized, we
On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Petr Cech wrote:
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization of
>>iterative variables in forloops. I know that present code style does not
>>allow it. But how I recognized, we use C99, and
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:19PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >>On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>>I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization
On (31/08/15 13:30), Robbie Harwood wrote:
>In the unit test for ini_config_augment(), there is an incorrect comment
>on the `patterns` field. For more information, see
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2769
>From 8e5d5769095edc0ebd84036b68b0f567959bb0d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From:
On 08/10/2015 04:27 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
From 725cb791d43e9f651345ec50419143c4e6bd22b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:16:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] SYSDB: Add function to expire entry
Ticket:
On 08/27/2015 11:56 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (18/08/15 15:31), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/17/2015 08:42 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolai Kondrashov"
To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon"
On 08/31/2015 02:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:46:11PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/31/2015 01:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:24:13PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:38 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
as we're stabilizing the
28 matches
Mail list logo