First patch, see attached.
This is for easy fix from ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2789
I am going on the assumption that if the first 2 characters of ad_server
are digits then it is likely an IP address and not hostname. If you have
a better idea for this please let me know.
On (24/02/16 16:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>We don't know the group name at that point yet, so better not print
>"null" in the debug message..
>From ffdc00755a9fbaeb54f781956a0025719e532b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Jakub Hrozek
>Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:29:08 +0100
On (24/02/16 17:47), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (24/02/16 17:18), David Disseldorp wrote:
>>From: David Disseldorp
>>
>>WORDS_BIGENDIAN, HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN and HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN are needed by
>>Samba. See Samba's byteorder.h header for an example.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: David
On (24/02/16 17:18), David Disseldorp wrote:
>From: David Disseldorp
>
>WORDS_BIGENDIAN, HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN and HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN are needed by
>Samba. See Samba's byteorder.h header for an example.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp
>---
> configure.ac | 3 +++
>
From: David Disseldorp
WORDS_BIGENDIAN, HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN and HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN are needed by
Samba. See Samba's byteorder.h header for an example.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp
---
configure.ac | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
On 02/24/2016 04:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:08:52PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello,
I've started the design page for Invalidating cached sudo rules here:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SUDOCachingRulesInvalidate
This task consists of two tickets (see
We don't know the group name at that point yet, so better not print
"null" in the debug message..
>From ffdc00755a9fbaeb54f781956a0025719e532b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:29:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Do not print "null" in the
This is just a code-style patch, but I got confused by the two if
statements, they made me think they were unrelated..
>From 20259fe42b8cec38b913c17a6b5be2e6456a31d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:56:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] IPA: Use the
On 02/24/2016 04:30 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On 02/23/2016 09:17 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:06:57PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On 02/22/2016 09:21 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:35:38PM
Hi,
the attached patch was already acked by Sumit as part of the adcli
thread, so I'd like to push it now.
>From 52003e9d03a38e863b46bb25fffd803ecf1716e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:24:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tests: Extend
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 09:17 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:06:57PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> >>On 02/22/2016 09:21 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:35:38PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:08:52PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've started the design page for Invalidating cached sudo rules here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SUDOCachingRulesInvalidate
>
> This task consists of two tickets (see below). So far, I have worked on the
On 02/23/2016 09:17 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:06:57PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On 02/22/2016 09:21 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:35:38PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
Thank you for comments! See my response.
On 02/19/2016 12:18 PM, Jakub Hrozek
Hi,
the attached patch fixes:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2959
It was confirmed by the original reporter. The bug was there since 2009,
by the way, I'm really suprised we only caught it now..
>From 0e734587a8fc4bb0160a2a7cbb5fae2054d5283c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:31:31AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 02:09 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:24:30PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2934
> >
> >> From 94ae3c5231dc7f1cd9f9d172d13a11a8afcacd16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:17:27PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:37:57PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:04:07PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the attached patches implement https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2522
> > >
> > >
On (24/02/16 14:01), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (24/02/16 12:47), Petr Cech wrote:
>>On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (23/02/16 08:28), Petr Cech wrote:
On 02/19/2016 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[...]
>>>Hello Lukas,
>>>
>>>thank you for
On (24/02/16 12:47), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (23/02/16 08:28), Petr Cech wrote:
>>>On 02/19/2016 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>Hello Lukas,
>>
>>thank you for careful code review. I addressed all comments and I found
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:37:57PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:04:07PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the attached patches implement https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2522
> >
> > Here is what I tested:
> > 1) topgr -> bottomgr -> extgr ->
On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/02/16 08:28), Petr Cech wrote:
On 02/19/2016 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[...]
Hello Lukas,
thank you for careful code review. I addressed all comments and I found
memory leak in original colondb tool. Patch of memory leak is
20 matches
Mail list logo