On (20/04/16 10:18), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 04/19/2016 08:18 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 04:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> > On 04/15/2016 09:54 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> > > Hi, CI fails on debian:
>> > > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/53/debian_testing/ci.html
>> >
>> > Hi,
>>
On 04/18/2016 04:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/15/2016 09:54 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi, CI fails on debian:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/53/debian_testing/ci.html
Hi,
CI tests passed locally.
Moderate CI tests passed too:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/87/summary.html
On 04/15/2016 09:54 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi, CI fails on debian:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/53/debian_testing/ci.html
Hi,
CI tests passed locally.
Moderate CI tests passed too:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/87/summary.html
And I have started rigorous CI tests
On 04/14/2016 04:50 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/13/2016 12:09 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/12/2016 04:24 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I investigated the time issue with Pavel -- it is probably known DST
issue [1].
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2316#comment:1
Patch uses work out with big
On 04/13/2016 12:09 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/12/2016 04:24 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I investigated the time issue with Pavel -- it is probably known DST
issue [1].
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2316#comment:1
Patch uses work out with big time shift.
Hi,
attached patch set
On 04/12/2016 04:24 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/12/2016 01:27 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/06/2016 04:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/31/2016 03:29 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I am going to take three days of PTO. There is my work. Tests don't leak
On 04/12/2016 01:27 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/06/2016 04:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/31/2016 03:29 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I am going to take three days of PTO. There is my work. Tests don't leak
and they really test :-) It is possible
On 04/06/2016 04:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/31/2016 03:29 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I am going to take three days of PTO. There is my work. Tests don't leak
and they really test :-) It is possible to use compact form of them,
maybe more help
On 03/31/2016 03:29 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I am going to take three days of PTO. There is my work. Tests don't leak
and they really test :-) It is possible to use compact form of them,
maybe more help functions... But I hope that main idea is
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
My big challenge is test_filter_rules_by_time(). I recognize that we
don't have function for load sudo rule by name. I mean how to obtain
struct sysdb_attrs *rule, for example by name of rule.
If I understand it rigt, we just prepare filter and we say (in
On 03/21/2016 03:39 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/15/2016 04:40 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/10/2016 02:36 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
There is whole patch set attached. I worked on tests (003 patch) last
couple days. I know that there are some
On (22/03/16 11:20), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 03/22/2016 11:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (22/03/16 10:37), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>On 03/21/2016 02:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 13:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On
On 03/22/2016 11:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (22/03/16 10:37), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/21/2016 02:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 13:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM,
On (22/03/16 10:37), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 03/21/2016 02:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (21/03/16 13:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>
>[...]
>
On 03/21/2016 02:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 13:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
+errno_t
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/15/2016 04:40 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/10/2016 02:36 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
There is whole patch set attached. I worked on tests (003 patch) last
couple days. I know that there are some test cases missing.
My big challenge is
On (21/03/16 13:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
>>>On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
>+errno_t
On 03/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
+errno_t
+sysdb_set_sudo_rule_attr(struct sss_domain_info *domain,
+ const char
On (21/03/16 11:02), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
>>
>>>+errno_t
>>>+sysdb_set_sudo_rule_attr(struct sss_domain_info *domain,
>>>+ const char *name,
>>>+
On 03/21/2016 11:02 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
+errno_t
+sysdb_set_sudo_rule_attr(struct sss_domain_info *domain,
+ const char *name,
+ struct
On 03/16/2016 12:37 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
[...]
*Patch 2: SYSDB: Add new funtions into sysdb_sudo*
+errno_t
+sysdb_set_sudo_rule_attr(struct sss_domain_info *domain,
+ const char *name,
+ struct sysdb_attrs *attrs,
+
On 03/15/2016 04:40 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/10/2016 02:36 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/09/2016 05:49 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions,
On 03/10/2016 02:36 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/09/2016 05:49 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions,
feel
free to disagree :-).
I will
On 03/09/2016 05:49 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions, feel
free to disagree :-).
I will address some suggestions tomorrow. I am doing tests
On 03/08/2016 05:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions, feel
free to disagree :-).
I will address some suggestions tomorrow. I am doing tests for
sysdb_sudo_rules now. Thanks for
On 03/08/2016 05:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions, feel
free to disagree :-).
I will address some suggestions tomorrow. I am doing tests for
sysdb_sudo_rules now. Thanks for comments.
Petr
On 03/08/2016 01:11 PM,
Hello Petr,
I just run through the code and I have some code style suggestions, feel free
to disagree :-).
On 03/08/2016 01:11 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
0001-SYSDB-Add-new-funtions-into-sysdb_sudo.patch
...
+
+errno_t sysdb_search_sudo_rules(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+
On 03/07/2016 01:53 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some,
On 03/07/2016 03:26 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi,
see comments inline.
errno_t sysdb_search_sudo_rules(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
struct sss_domain_info *domain,
const char *sub_filter,
On 03/07/2016 03:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:53 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
ret = sysdb_search_entry(mem_ctx, domain->sysdb, dn,
LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, filter,
On 03/07/2016 01:53 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some,
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi,
see comments inline.
errno_t sysdb_search_sudo_rules(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
struct sss_domain_info *domain,
const char *sub_filter,
const char **attrs,
On 03/03/2016 02:15 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/03/2016 02:00 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried
to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function:
# src/db/sysdb_sudo.h
errno_t
sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain,
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some, but there were troubles with memory leak.
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some, but there were troubles with memory leak. Maybe I
haven't understood necessary logic
On 03/03/2016 02:00 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried
to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function:
# src/db/sysdb_sudo.h
errno_t
sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain,
struct sysdb_attrs ** rules,
size_t num_rules);
Hi,
I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried
to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function:
# src/db/sysdb_sudo.h
errno_t
sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain,
struct sysdb_attrs ** rules,
size_t num_rules);
As far as I see first parameter
37 matches
Mail list logo
