URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/49
Title: #49: Try to match multiple results from an AD initgroups request against
domain's search bases, too
Label: +Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
> Thank you for digging into this and finding the connection to gnutls. Do you
> think this is an issue which should be solved in OpenLDAP or gnutls as well,
> or is it
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/60
Title: #60: Document ad_access_filter search for nested groups
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Just a small nitpick. Can you put the URL into a element like e.g. in
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/blob/master/src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml#L1047 ? This
will make
Hey Fabiano,
Thanks for update..
I have posted detailed steps for:
1. Getting source Code
2. Doing Code Changes
3. Running Integration Tests...
on [https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/60]
if we can integrate them on contribute-link. That may help 1st timers in
builiding, Running Integration
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Thank you for digging into this and finding the connection to gnutls. Do you
think this is an issue which should be solved in OpenLDAP or gnutls as well, or
is it really
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/57
Title: #57: LDAP/AD: resolve domain local groups for remote users
jhrozek commented:
"""
Thank you, this version reads better to me and still works fine (adding and
removing the global group as well..)
So far ACK, I will push the patch once I'm able
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/57
Title: #57: LDAP/AD: resolve domain local groups for remote users
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/60
Title: #60: Document ad_access_filter search for nested groups
amitkumar50 commented:
"""
Thanks Islebodn . Conflicts are resolved..
Posting What I did may help some one.
Steps for
1. Getting source Code
2. Doing Code Changes
3. Running
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/62
Title: #62: PAM: add pam_response_filter option
jhrozek commented:
"""
retest this please
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/62#issuecomment-256572973
___
sssd-devel mailing list
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
nmav commented:
"""
I don't quite understand what the fix is about nor how it relates to gnutls. Is
it about wrong handling of the client socket? To know whether the issue is on
the gnutls server,
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/60
Title: #60: Document ad_access_filter search for nested groups
jhrozek commented:
"""
The documentation now looks correct, I just wonder why did you remove the
example paragraph in the last iteration of the patch? IMO it would be useful..
"""
See the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
nmav commented:
"""
I think from the above is clear that there must be some issue in the
non-blocking support of libldap with gnutls, or that you are not using it
properly. If you know you are
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/39
Title: #39: RESPONDER: Enable sudoRule in case insen. domains (1.13)
pbrezina commented:
"""
The patch looks good to me. I'd feel better if we somehow managed to backport
patch that solves the fully qualified issue in 1.14 though.
I'm not that sure
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/48
Author: mzidek-rh
Title: #48: sssctl: Flags for commadn initialization
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/48/head:pr48
git checkout pr48
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
> Could you explain what is the interaction between sssd and gnutls? Do you
> pass the fd (which was set to non-blocking) or so to gnutls?
There is not direct
On 10/27/2016 08:31 AM, Amit Kumar wrote:
Hey Fabiano,
Thanks for update..
I have posted detailed steps for:
1. Getting source Code
2. Doing Code Changes
3. Running Integration Tests...
Feel free to also checkout [1] and just run 'rebuild' when you want to
build sssd.
[1]
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
nmav commented:
"""
Could you explain what is the interaction between sssd and gnutls? Do you pass
the fd (which was set to non-blocking) or so?
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
nmav commented:
"""
Could you explain what is the interaction between sssd and gnutls? Do you pass
the fd (which was set to non-blocking) or so to gnutls?
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
and client + gnutls debug without O_NONBLOCK
```
(Thu Oct 27 11:37:03 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [simple_bind_send] (0x0100):
Executing simple bind as:
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
client log + gnutls debug
```
(Thu Oct 27 11:20:35 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [simple_bind_send] (0x0100):
Executing simple bind as: uid=mof_user1,dc=example,dc=com
gnutls[5]:
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
client log + gnutls debug
```
(Thu Oct 27 11:49:01 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [simple_bind_send] (0x0100):
Executing simple bind as: uid=mof_user1,dc=example,dc=com
gnutls[5]:
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/48
Title: #48: sssctl: Flags for commadn initialization
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/46
Title: #46: sss_client: Defer thread cancellation until completion of nss/pam
operations
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Here is the original reproducer/test program from
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1460 written by Fedora user werkt (I had
to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/46
Title: #46: sss_client: Defer thread cancellation until completion of nss/pam
operations
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Here is the original reproducer/test program from
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1460 written by Fedora user werkt (I had
to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/48
Title: #48: sssctl: Flags for commadn initialization
lslebodn commented:
"""
ACK
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/48#issuecomment-256677906
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/67
Title: #67: UTIL: Unset O_NONBLOCK for ldap connection
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (27/10/16 02:03), Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>I don't quite understand what the fix is about nor how it relates to gnutls.
>Is it about wrong handling of the client
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/65
Title: #65: Fixing of nitpicks
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:28:27AM -0700, lslebodn wrote:
> lslebodn commented on this pull request.
>
>
>
> > @@ -1104,7 +1104,6 @@ bool sss_krb5_realm_has_proxy(const char *realm)
>
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/48
Title: #48: sssctl: Flags for commadn initialization
lslebodn commented:
"""
master:
* cbee11e912bb391ba254b0bac8c1159c1f634533
sssd-1-14:
* ec1829de7cd529c2c68b4bdb9b6d43ac6bb545d3
LS
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/60
Title: #60: Document ad_access_filter search for nested groups
taupehat commented:
"""
@jhrozek I did not intend to remove anything from the last iteration. It's
possible that I used the editor wrong. Do I need to delete the prior pull
request and
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/43
Title: #43: RESPONDER: Enable sudoRule in case insen. domains (1.15)
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:56:21AM -0700, Pavel Březina wrote:
> pbrezina requested changes on this pull request.
>
> Hi, there is one indentation which can be
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/68
Title: #68: MAN: Document different defaults for AD provider
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/68#issuecomment-256778566
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/68
Author: justin-stephenson
Title: #68: MAN: Document different defaults for AD provider
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Update man pages for any AD provider config options that differ from
ldap/krb5 provider back-end defaults.
Resolves:
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/68
Title: #68: MAN: Document different defaults for AD provider
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/68#issuecomment-256778568
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:21:40PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> +1 I can help with transition to Pagure.
> git hosting is not a problem and Nikolai voluntered to
> convert wiki to markdown in git
Sorry to restart an old thread, but..
I bought the sssd.io domain name. The intent is to have a
Hi,
I'm currently working on integration tests for the 'files' provider and
during this work I started to feel we are pushing the boundaries around our
test infrastructure already quite a bit. When SSSD talks over network to
a server, then we're more or less okay, but for some parts of SSSD, like
35 matches
Mail list logo
