URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
fidencio commented:
"""
@sumit-bose, is it only visible with direct AD integration or can I use an
IPA-AD trust setup to test it?
"""
See the full comment at
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> People,
>
> Ideally every PR should come with a test (unit, integration, ...), but
> unfortunately we're a little bit far from the ideal situation. Thus, I'd
> like to ask whether we have documented somewhere (apart from our code
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:51:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:52:56AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > People,
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/470
Author: jhrozek
Title: #470: IPA: Enable periodic subdomains refresh only after
responder-induced refresh finishes
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/470/head:pr470
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
lslebodn commented:
"""
master:
* c36a66b7fb77cff29400c751b363a342923e122e
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484#issuecomment-356685388
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/485
Title: #485: Support alternative sources for the files provider
pbrezina commented:
"""
The option names should drop the `alt` prefix since they default to
`/etc/passwd` and `/etc/group` which are not default at all. So it should
rather be called
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName
fidencio commented:
"""
> I wonder here if @lslebodn could not have asked about unit/integration tests
> as the first thing saving thus the time of other reviewers.
I'm sorry, because I did **not** express
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/470
Title: #470: IPA: Enable periodic subdomains refresh only after
responder-induced refresh finishes
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
sumit-bose commented:
"""
@fidencio, iirc the issue was found with direct integration but it should be
visible on an IPA server as well.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/470
Title: #470: IPA: Enable periodic subdomains refresh only after
responder-induced refresh finishes
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
I checked the coding guidelines if there is something about upper-cased
constants and did not find anything, so I guess it was
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
fidencio commented:
"""
Okay, I've been able to reproduce it with the direct AD integration by doing:
- AD side:
- Create an AD group (its Group scope is set as "Global" and its Group
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:52:56AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > People,
> > >
> > > Ideally every PR should come with a test (unit, integration,
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName
lslebodn commented:
"""
I did not require any changes in PR. I only asked trivial question because I do
not know the answer.
Therefore removing label changed requested
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
fidencio commented:
"""
Just a note ... I'm not sure if the test I've done is the right one, but that
was the way I've managed to reproduce the issue. Weirdly I can't see the debug
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/489
Author: lslebodn
Title: #489: libnfsidmap: Use public plugin header file if available
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
libnfsidmap was merged with nfs-utils in 2.1.2-rc7.
We used private internal interface but required internal functions
were dropped in
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:52:56AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > People,
> >
> > Ideally every PR should come with a test (unit, integration, ...), but
> > unfortunately we're a little bit far from the ideal situation. Thus, I'd
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/487
Title: #487: SYSDB: Fix sysdb_search_by_name() for looking up groups in MPG
domains
pbrezina commented:
"""
LGTM. A comment in the if would be nice. Also having `sysdb_domain_base_dn`
similar to what we have for user/group would be nicer.
"""
See
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
fidencio commented:
"""
> Just a note ... I'm not sure if the test I've done is the right one, but that
> was the way I've managed to reproduce the issue. Weirdly I can't see the
> debug
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:30:16PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:42:16PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wrote a design page about exposing the functionality that creates the
> > user private groups based on the user entry only:
> >
> >
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName
fidencio commented:
"""
Adding the "Changes Requested" label as per @lslebodn's review.
I wonder here if @lslebodn could not have asked about unit/integration tests as
the first thing saving thus the time
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484
Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()
sumit-bose commented:
"""
@fidencio, on the AD side you have to add a group from the BUILTIN domain, e.g.
'Users' or 'Administrators', to a normal security group which can be read by
24 matches
Mail list logo