URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
With Samba 4.7 the interface version of the idmap plugin was updated to
6. The patch adds support for this new version but can be complied
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
fidencio commented:
"""
Patches look good. I'm just firing a CI run and I'll add the "Accepted" label
as soon as I get the results.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
Label: -Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/572/head:pr572
git checkout pr572
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571
Title: #571: MAN: Clarify how comments work in sssd.conf
fidencio commented:
"""
master:
4ab4a26
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571#issuecomment-390243061
___
sssd-devel
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571
Title: #571: MAN: Clarify how comments work in sssd.conf
Label: -Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
fidencio commented:
"""
master:
c6b99b0
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572#issuecomment-390243490
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #571: MAN: Clarify how comments work in sssd.conf
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/571/head:pr571
git checkout pr571
Hi folks,
I sent a mail about new sbus implementation (I'll refer to it as sbus2)
[1]. Now, I'm integrating it into SSSD. The work is quite difficult
since it touches all parts of SSSD and the changes are usually
interconnected but I'm slowly moving towards the goal [2].
At this moment, I'm
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
fidencio commented:
"""
Ack!
CI: http://sssd-ci.${idm}/job/ci/8930/
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572#issuecomment-390211974
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/572
Title: #572: winbind idmap plugin: support inferface version 6
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571
Title: #571: MAN: Clarify how comments work in sssd.conf
fidencio commented:
"""
Ack!
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/571#issuecomment-390199893
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 21:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On 18 May 2018, at 14:33, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >
> > Also here is a bonus question - do any of you remember why we use private
> > server at all? Why don't we connect to system message bus? I do not see any
> >
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/573
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #573: winbind idmap plugin: fix detection
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Currently when compiling the detection code for the idmap interface
version only SMBCLIENT_CFLAGS are used. Since libsmbclient does not use
NTSTATUS the
> On 18 May 2018, at 14:33, Pavel Březina wrote:
>
> Also here is a bonus question - do any of you remember why we use private
> server at all? Why don't we connect to system message bus? I do not see any
> benefit in having a private server.
To expand on what Sumit
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 16:11 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:33:32PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I sent a mail about new sbus implementation (I'll refer to it as sbus2) [1].
Sorry Pavel,
but I need to ask, why a new bus instead of somthing like varlink ?
>
17 matches
Mail list logo