[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-10 Thread jhrozek
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

jhrozek commented:
"""
The fix itself was pushed as 67645557dc0301e7ea66bba15c4ff3fb11f9540e and 
Sumit's test was pushed as 0f8add07b8257fcce9f62ad80d24e79b8013ae42. I filed a 
ticket about the python3 issue.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-372056009
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-07 Thread lslebodn
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

lslebodn commented:
"""
@sumit-bose, thank you very much for increasing test coverage.
Initially I though that it could be included in sssd git using our internal 
python-multihost `src/tests/python/`. But it is not related where is the test 
but that such test exist.

Test is ready so please push this PR.

> https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/SSSD/sssd/c/859ab248be719eef5d84dbbed27f146f2aa162e8?branch=netgroup_tests

That can be reviewed as a separate PR because that one is IPA specific. I know 
it is a little bit unrelated but I have few tips to your netgroup test. It can 
be simplified a little bit + such version would not work with python3 (because  
'str' object has no attribute 'decode') please create separate pr and I'll add 
comments there.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-371296550
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-07 Thread lslebodn
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

lslebodn commented:
"""
@sumit-bose, thank you very much for increasing test coverage.
Initially I though that it could be included in sssd git using our internal 
python-multihost `src/tests/python/`. But it is not related where is the test 
but that such test exist.

Test is ready so please push this PR.

> https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/SSSD/sssd/c/859ab248be719eef5d84dbbed27f146f2aa162e8?branch=netgroup_tests

Thank can be safely created as a separate PR because that one is IPA specific. 
I know it is a little bit unrelated but I have few tips to your netgroup test. 
It can be simplified a little bit + such version would not work with python3 
(because  'str' object has no attribute 'decode') please create separate pr and 
i'll add comments there.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-371296550
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-07 Thread sumit-bose
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

sumit-bose commented:
"""
@jhrozek, please find some additional integration tests for netgroups where 
some components like the NIS domain name are missing at 
https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/SSSD/sssd/c/859ab248be719eef5d84dbbed27f146f2aa162e8?branch=netgroup_tests.
 Feel free to add it to your patch set.

Since the original issue is in the IPA provider which is currently not used in 
the SSSD integration tests I prepared a patch for the IPA integration tests at 
https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/freeipa/c/9a2789ed643b9ec20aef7373ebb51342317af341?branch=netgroups_test.
 If the fixes are commited to SSSD I'll prepare an IPA PR with the patch.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-371144195
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-07 Thread sumit-bose
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

sumit-bose commented:
"""
@jhrozek, please find some additional integration tests for netgroups where 
some components like the NIS domain name are missing at 
https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/SSSD/sssd/c/859ab248be719eef5d84dbbed27f146f2aa162e8?branch=netgroup_tests.

Since the original issue is in the IPA provider which is currently not used in 
the SSSD integration tests I prepared a patch for the IPA integration tests at 
https://pagure.io/fork/sbose/freeipa/c/9a2789ed643b9ec20aef7373ebb51342317af341?branch=netgroups_test.
 If the fixes are commited to SSSD I'll prepare an IPA PR with the patch.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-371144195
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-03-06 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn, please, I've asked you before, please, **move on**.

You have already caused enough damage by deliberately blocking my work (or 
anything I've tried to do in the project), offending me publicly in PRs ...

I sincerely don't understand why a person who's **not** a maintainer of the 
project **nor** part of the team has the rights to be adding/removing labels.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-370954252
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-10 Thread lslebodn
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

lslebodn commented:
"""
I did not require any changes in PR. I only asked trivial question because I do 
not know the answer.

Therefore removing label changed requested
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356595745
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-10 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
> I wonder here if @lslebodn could not have asked about unit/integration tests 
> as the first thing saving thus the time of other reviewers.

I'm sorry, because I did **not** express my self in the proper way here.
I've dropped an email to SSSD devel list about the subject [0] and hopefully we 
can keep the discussion there.

[0]: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/message/J63UKSULDPV4RIUSI3W7GQO4UFQGQ4DE/
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356545022
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-10 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
Adding the "Changes Requested" label as per @lslebodn's review.

I wonder here if @lslebodn could not have asked about unit/integration tests as 
the first thing saving thus the time of other reviewers.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356530674
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-09 Thread lslebodn
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

lslebodn commented:
"""
There is neither unit test nor integration test in this PR and moreover 
upstream ticket is not linked to any downstream BZ? May I know who will write a 
regression test?
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356505076
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-09 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
CI:http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/90/summary.html
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356434161
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-09 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
Works as expected, no issues found by coverity and internal CI is running. In 
order to do thing by the booj, I'll add the "Accepted" label as soon as I get 
the results.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356415156
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-08 Thread jhrozek
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

jhrozek commented:
"""
I described the steps to reproduce in the commit message, does that work for 
you?
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-356090663
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-01 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476
Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

fidencio commented:
"""
Patch looks good, although I don't know how to reproduce the issue.

Would be possible to add steps to reproduce (either here or in the pagure 
issue)?

ps: I'm not adding myself as a reviewer as I don't want to block someone else 
who knows how to reproduce the issue and can give a quicker ACK.

I'm firing internal CI, coverity and so on.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476#issuecomment-354714759
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org