Thanks for the suggestion James!
That sounds similar to what our existing SAN vendor (Hitachi) does with their
NAS devices. We avoided it as it had a very low maximum user limit (from memory
only 1000 at a time) and it sounded unmanageable through automation anyway (no
API etc).
It sounds
Hi Spike,
Yes I mean exactly that.
From what I've read that RFC and the schema extension for AD has been
deprecated for some time. (Sorry I can't find the link now on my phone but I'm
confident that it's right)
Thanks!
Ed
___
sssd-users mailing list
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:39 PM wrote:
> For good reasons we need to move from Linux based file servers to a
> NAS. The problem is that all our Linux systems use the SSD ID
> mapping algorithm to calculate UID and GIDs (and it works
> great!). We've not found a commercial NAS vendor who
Ed,
When you say "uses the SSSD ID mapping algorithm to calculate UID and GID",
do you mean that algorithm that formulaically calculates the user's UID off
the Windows SID?
We are a large company (~25 - 27k sssd clients), but we use the RFC 2307bis
schema extension from Microsoft. Beaucoup NAS
