Hello! 23.03.2018, 02:28, "Emmanuel Gil Peyrot" :Hi,On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:I don't see any XEP which describes of full procedure of file transferusing OOB.But [1]XEP-0095: Stream Initiation has [2]mention of using OOB
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
>Hello!
>
[snip]
>I don't see any XEP which describes of full procedure of file transfer
>using OOB.
>But [1]XEP-0095: Stream Initiation has [2]mention of using OOB as stream
>method.
>I guess, this
> 1. What software has XEP-0131 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
> 1. What software has XEP-0141 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
I’ve implemented it in Babbler,
Thanks! These are awesome!
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, 19:10 Tedd Sterr, wrote:
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-03-21/#16:00:28
>
> Dave warns he's on a train and may not manage to achieve all 4 of the
> necessary Gs.
>
> *1) Roll Call*
> Dave orders bacon and cheese, Georg
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-03-21/#16:00:28
Dave warns he's on a train and may not manage to achieve all 4 of the necessary
Gs.
1) Roll Call
Dave orders bacon and cheese, Georg wants the same; Sam wants cheese on all the
things.
Present: Dave, Georg, Sam, Kev.
AWOL: Daniel
.) For
On 2018/03/22, Matthew Wild wrote:
> We're discussing the protocol, but there is nothing stopping clients
> having their own overrides (i.e. local autojoin rooms). This could be
> as simple as, when you join a room for the first time "Do you want to
> join this room on all devices?" -> if the user
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, at 02:58, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> 1. What software has XEP-0229 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
I
I'm very interested to see if there has been any implementation of this
specification at all. If there hasn't been, then of course it cannot
advance, and I would in this case prefer to deprecate it.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, 07:59 Jonas Wielicki, wrote:
> The XEP Editor would
Hello! 21.03.2018, 14:32, "Christian Schudt" :Maybe you are right. It was just a guess, because someone asked for the purpose of 0066.Because the uploaded file is persistent (at least for some time), I concluded that the purpose is for offline file transfer.Maybe the
On 22 March 2018 at 07:51, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 22. März 2018 08:36:10 CET Matthew Wild wrote:
>> As per the logic described in my previous email, you can either set
>> autojoin and explicitly leave the room on your mobile when it
>> autojoins - the client
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0141 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0141 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0229 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0229 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0131 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0131 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be
On Donnerstag, 22. März 2018 08:36:10 CET Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 21 March 2018 at 18:37, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 18:07:53 CET Sam Whited wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, at 12:01, Kevin Smith wrote:
> >> > I’d argue (and did at the Summit) that
On 21 March 2018 at 18:37, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 18:07:53 CET Sam Whited wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, at 12:01, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> > I’d argue (and did at the Summit) that the opposite is true and that if
>> > we want (especially impromptu)
On 21 March 2018 at 17:27, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> On 2018/03/21, Sam Whited wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, at 12:01, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> > I’d argue (and did at the Summit) that the opposite is true and that if
>> > we want (especially impromptu) MUC to start working nicely
17 matches
Mail list logo